City of New Bedford Meetings
Search and subscribe to city meeting topics that impact you
Newsletters
Subscribe
← Back to video
Appointments & Briefings Committee — January 28, 2026
−
Fit
+
IN
0:00
OUT
0:00
Length
0:00
▶ Play selection
Export clip
Keyboard:
I
set in,
O
set out,
←
/
→
nudge playhead 5s.
0:00
We killed the other one.
In
Out
1:16
No, we're not.
In
Out
1:23
No.
In
Out
1:37
Was that the gas?
In
Out
1:41
Gas up there?
In
Out
1:44
Hi, you ready, Gus?
In
Out
1:47
Okay, tell me when you're ready.
In
Out
2:04
You want to leave it there for a minute?
In
Out
2:06
Dennis, leave it there for a minute.
In
Out
2:07
Dennis.
In
Out
2:09
Almost two months, no no problems.
In
Out
2:18
I'll do it one more time.
In
Out
2:22
How's that?
In
Out
2:26
Counselors, would you take your seats?
In
Out
2:28
We're going to be beginning in a moment.
In
Out
2:31
Anybody that wants to speak, there is a sign-up sheet at the podium at the door.
In
Out
2:36
If you'd like to go sign up.
In
Out
2:38
I know some people have signed up already and some haven't.
In
Out
2:42
So if anybody wants to, we'll leave it there for a couple more minutes.
In
Out
2:45
So anybody want to sign up?
In
Out
2:48
And the new people that just walked in the door, there's a sign-up sheet if you'd like to speak.
In
Out
2:52
You can sign up at the podium.
In
Out
2:55
Okay, councilors, take your seats.
In
Out
3:00
Thank you, everybody.
In
Out
3:01
This is the Committee on Appointments and Briefings.
In
Out
3:04
It is January 28, 2026, and it's 7:03.
In
Out
3:09
Note, this meeting is being livestreamed and recorded.
In
Out
3:13
City Council and committee meetings can be viewed on the City of New Bedford's homepage under Quick Links, then Meetings.
In
Out
3:21
So today in the chamber, we're joined by a councilor at large, Ian Abreu.
In
Out
3:24
I saw him, I walked in with him, he's not in his seat.
In
Out
3:27
Councilor from Ward 2, Scott Pemberton.
In
Out
3:29
Councilor for Ward 1, Leo Choquette.
In
Out
3:32
Councilor Ward 5, Joseph Lopes.
In
Out
3:34
Councilor at Large, James Roy.
In
Out
3:37
Councilor for Ward 3, Sean Oliver.
In
Out
3:40
And Councilor at Large, Jane Bergo.
In
Out
3:42
Thank you all for coming.
In
Out
3:43
And I'm Naomi Carney, Chair of Appointments and Briefings, and thank you all for coming.
In
Out
3:48
Would you like anything to read in the record?
In
Out
3:50
Nothing.
In
Out
3:51
Okay.
In
Out
3:52
Item number 1 is a written motion.
In
Out
3:53
Councilor Oliver requesting that the Committee on Appointments and Briefings schedule a meeting prior to Thursday, February 12, 2026 City Council meeting for the purpose of allowing the residents of Illinois, Ohio, Jerry, Maryland, and Appleton Streets a forum in which they may voice any concerns regarding the proposed ordinance amending Chapter 9 Comprehensive Zoning, specifically as it relates to parking requirements under Appendix C, Table of Parking and Loading Requirements, to be referred to the Committee on Appointments and Briefings.
In
Out
4:23
And it has been.
In
Out
4:25
Number 1 is now before you.
In
Out
4:26
A motion to receive and place on file.
In
Out
4:28
Motion been made by Councilor Oliver, second by Councilor Choquette.
In
Out
4:31
All in favor say aye.
In
Out
4:32
Aye.
In
Out
4:33
Opposed?
In
Out
4:33
The ayes have it.
In
Out
4:34
Councilor Oliver, would you like to say a few things before we bring people to the podium?
In
Out
4:38
Yes.
In
Out
4:38
Uh, okay.
In
Out
4:39
Thank you, um, Madam Chair.
In
Out
4:41
I, uh, I appreciate the opportunity.
In
Out
4:42
I, uh, obviously, as we've discussed, um, wanted to provide the folks a forum in which they can voice concerns around this proposed ordinance.
In
Out
4:54
Um, be it as it may, there may be some miscommunication or whatever that the neighborhood might have felt slighted as far as representation when it came to the, the drafting and ultimately voting on this ordinance.
In
Out
5:12
And most of that obviously had circled around a proposed development that's floating around.
In
Out
5:21
The idea is floating around for this neighborhood, so they had some additional concerns as well.
In
Out
5:28
Um, although those 2 things, uh, this ordinance and that development, were— are running in 2 different, um, tandems and in 2 different venues, um, I felt it necessary for folks to still come in and, uh, voice those concerns.
In
Out
5:43
So here we are, uh, with an additional forum in which that neighborhood can, can do so.
In
Out
5:50
Um, but with that being said, although they have concerns with the development, um, it's— this is a citywide ordinance, um, and it's not going to be a, uh, uh, it— we have to almost take a one-size-fits-all approach, knowing farewell that it's not going to fit every neighborhood.
In
Out
6:09
And that's why we have other mechanisms in place, such as the planning board and zoning board and inspectional services, that are going to oversee any developments that come to be anyways.
In
Out
6:19
But this is their opportunity to voice what their concerns are with this ordinance, and I just hope that the, the folks— I see it looks like they're here to take advantage of that, so I'm happy that it ended up working out and appreciate the opportunity for them to come in and give us their feedback on it.
In
Out
6:36
So thank you for the opportunity.
In
Out
6:38
Thank you, Councilor.
In
Out
6:39
Councilor Abril.
In
Out
6:40
Thank you very much, Madam Chair.
In
Out
6:43
Some of the points I was going to make, my esteemed colleague from Ward 3 already made.
In
Out
6:47
But just to kind of piggyback a little bit off of that, just to be clear and transparent, there's no killing of this ordinance tonight.
In
Out
6:57
There's no killing of the China Buffet development proposal.
In
Out
7:01
I don't want to make sure anyone's being misled.
In
Out
7:03
That's not the purpose of this hearing.
In
Out
7:05
This purpose of this hearing, which I voted for and I supported, as I believe it was unanimous throughout the entire body, was for folks to come here and speak and speak their piece and give their opinions and views.
In
Out
7:17
And it's going to be opinions and views that are well taken because as Sean— or I should say, excuse me, the Ward 3 councilor had said, and he's correct— when this development, no matter what goes on at that China Buffet property, whether it's, you know, a fast food joint, whether it's the housing development which is being spoken about now and talked about, this will have to go before the planning board.
In
Out
7:40
Called site plan review.
In
Out
7:41
That's where restrictions can get put in place, like parking, lighting, signage, all of that.
In
Out
7:47
So that's where this stuff sort of gets litigated.
In
Out
7:50
But the points that are going to be brought forward to us tonight, I think, could be points that could be well taken and used in that hearing for the site plan review, that we could use and testify on behalf of the neighborhood if and when this development does go forward.
In
Out
8:04
So I just wanted to be clear on everybody so everyone understood you know, uh, the balls and strikes here tonight.
In
Out
8:11
This isn't getting killed, it's not getting stopped.
In
Out
8:14
This is just a discussion where we can hear the concerns and then we can move forward from there.
In
Out
8:19
So with that, I'll yield.
In
Out
8:20
Thank you.
In
Out
8:21
Thank you, Councilor Avril.
In
Out
8:22
Councilor Shookat.
In
Out
8:24
Thank you, Madam Chair.
In
Out
8:25
I'd like to continue with what my 2 esteemed colleagues had said prior.
In
Out
8:30
So nothing has been submitted yet.
In
Out
8:34
On this issue.
In
Out
8:35
So we are in like what you would call a prototype, prototype stage here.
In
Out
8:42
Nothing has been submitted.
In
Out
8:44
So this is really kind of, you know, us wanting to hear from the, you know, from my constituents, our constituents in Ward 1 in these areas.
In
Out
8:54
It's, as you all know, I take this very seriously and I always like to have the people's voice heard.
In
Out
9:00
Far in advance of any surprises or any issues coming about.
In
Out
9:05
I'd like to thank my colleagues for allowing this to happen, and I'd like to thank the constituents we have here tonight for coming in and wanting to be heard.
In
Out
9:14
That's— this is all part of the democratic process.
In
Out
9:17
And thank you.
In
Out
9:19
Thank you, Councilor Choquette.
In
Out
9:21
Anybody else want to speak?
In
Out
9:23
Okay, so we'll start with the people that signed up.
In
Out
9:27
We have Caroline Carol Sassolini.
In
Out
9:35
You can approach the podium.
In
Out
9:49
Thank you.
In
Out
9:51
Okay, this is.
In
Out
9:52
Um, I just put these notes here because otherwise I would forget half the things I wanted to say.
In
Out
10:00
Um, but it's hard to believe the hypocrisy of what's happening in our city.
In
Out
10:05
For years we've been hearing about quality of life, about green spaces, about alternative energy, about planting trees, etc.
In
Out
10:15
Excuse me, Mrs. Cicilline, could you get a little closer to the microphone?
In
Out
10:19
Okay, thank you.
In
Out
10:20
You want to start again?
In
Out
10:22
Sure, please.
In
Out
10:26
Oh, we have it.
In
Out
10:27
Yeah, she's— people that signed up, we have their addresses.
In
Out
10:32
Okay, okay.
In
Out
10:35
It's okay.
In
Out
10:38
It's hard to believe the hypocrisy of what's happening in our city.
In
Out
10:42
For years we've been hearing about quality of life, about green spaces, about alternative energy, about planting trees, etc., ad infinitum.
In
Out
10:54
Yet all of a sudden it's okay to build a monstrous-sized apartment house on a postage stamp-sized lot with no backyard, no porches, no balconies, virtually no landscaping, and very limited parking.
In
Out
11:09
A huge building that will necessitate necessitate the stealing of parking spaces currently being used by the existing neighborhood.
In
Out
11:19
A huge monstrosity that will put their neighbors' sunny gardens in the shade, that will take away the possibility for the surrounding single-story homes to install solar in the future.
In
Out
11:34
This is a nightmare for the current neighborhood and not exactly offering a quality of life for the future tenants who will be warehoused like rats in cages in order to line the landlord's pockets with gold.
In
Out
11:50
This lowering of required parking spaces is applicable to the whole city and is ridiculous in the light of the fact that we are in an area that has snowstorms and narrow streets and already have more vehicles than places to park them, as is plainly evident by the number of cars that were ticketed or towed this past weekend.
In
Out
12:13
This whole issue— sorry, this whole issue is not only hypocritical and ridiculous, but both heartbreaking and cruel for the present neighborhood, but also for the future tenants.
In
Out
12:35
And I want to also mention that where I live is I live in the second house north of the New York Chinese Buffet on Ashley Boulevard, and my driveway is what was supposed to be part of Appleton Street.
In
Out
12:54
Um, half the time when I'm coming out of my driveway and people park along Ashley Boulevard, I can't see the traffic that's coming from the left.
In
Out
13:09
And it's very, very difficult that we already have a problem with parking and visibility, and it's even more compounded once— when Voigt gets out and when the people from the industrial park get out.
In
Out
13:28
And it's, it's already very, a very congested area.
In
Out
13:33
So thank you.
In
Out
13:35
Thank you.
In
Out
13:40
John Chabot, you're up next.
In
Out
13:53
Good evening, Mr. Chairman.
In
Out
13:54
I'm from 142 Illinois Street.
In
Out
13:57
I've been living in that neighborhood for 37 years.
In
Out
14:00
Very, very residential neighborhood.
In
Out
14:03
Uh, the parking there, it's going to be a nightmare.
In
Out
14:07
You add that many people in that location, 22 complexes, most people have 2 cars.
In
Out
14:15
Where are they going to park?
In
Out
14:17
They're going to park on the street.
In
Out
14:18
People aren't going to be able to get out of their driveway when we have a big snowstorm.
In
Out
14:23
What are they going to do?
In
Out
14:26
You've, you've got people in there that can't get out now.
In
Out
14:30
That's— it's— to me, it's ridiculous to try and put something like that in that neighborhood.
In
Out
14:36
Thank you.
In
Out
14:37
Thank you, Mr. Sharp.
In
Out
14:38
Now the next one we have is John Preston.
In
Out
14:55
John Preston, 250 Jarry Street.
In
Out
14:58
Um, I want to thank the council for letting us be heard tonight.
In
Out
15:02
I know we all don't agree on everything, but one thing we do agree on is that healthy debate should never be stifled, okay?
In
Out
15:11
And I appreciate— I really do, I mean that— I appreciate you guys letting us come and say our piece.
In
Out
15:17
I realize that this is about the ordinance specific, um, and it just cuts deep because of the timing of where it hit, and it felt as though the ordinance was specific to that project in the timeline, and perhaps that's not the case.
In
Out
15:41
Okay.
In
Out
15:44
I'm a veteran of the, of the United States Marine Corps, and we have a saying: proper prior planning prevents poor performance.
In
Out
15:54
And I, for one, appreciate the fact that we need more housing, okay?
In
Out
15:59
But I'm, I'm very concerned about lowering the parking to one spot per unit.
In
Out
16:08
It's going to create traffic nightmares across the city.
In
Out
16:12
There's going to be undue strain on infrastructure and school.
In
Out
16:16
I mean, the population really could, could, could explode.
In
Out
16:23
I don't want to get into too much detail about that project because that's not really what we're here to talk about.
In
Out
16:29
I want to thank Bruce for coming.
In
Out
16:31
Bruce and I have worked with Councilor Choquette and the neighbors.
In
Out
16:38
You know, the big, the big thing with this parking is the potential for negative impact on the taxpayers, on the equity in our homes.
In
Out
16:50
You know, specifically to our neighborhood, if there's a 20-unit apartment building at the top of the street and there's cars parked everywhere and I have an open house to sell my house That's going to dissuade some buyers and probably going to get lower offers, and the equity in our homes is going to be affected.
In
Out
17:10
And I think, in my opinion, on my humble opinion, is that, um, and I, I don't know, you know, the ins and outs and the, in the proceedings of the city council and ordinances and how things, you know, move forward.
In
Out
17:29
I don't know if there's some kind of caveat that could be added to limit these, uh, changes in, in single-family neighborhoods like that.
In
Out
17:37
It's, it's, um, you know, Massachusetts had a net negative migration of 33,000 people last year.
In
Out
17:49
I promise you those are taxpayers and voters, and people are fleeing So please consider our concerns as a neighborhood as it relates to this ordinance.
In
Out
18:04
I don't know what the final number will be, whether it'll still be 2 or 1.5 or 1 or 0, but those are our concerns.
In
Out
18:13
Thank you for letting me speak.
In
Out
18:16
Thank you.
In
Out
18:19
Those have— everybody that signed up, but anybody here would like to speak?
In
Out
18:25
Anybody else would like to approach the podium and say a few words?
In
Out
18:27
Yes, please.
In
Out
18:31
Wait, we need your name.
In
Out
18:33
You don't have to give your address, just your name.
In
Out
18:34
That's all right.
In
Out
18:35
Michelle Pacheco, 136 Jerry Street.
In
Out
18:39
P as in Peter, A-C-H-E-C-O, E-C-O, and it's Michelle with 2 L's if we're really going to get into it.
In
Out
18:48
So Um, I just— I, I, to summarize, or actually just add to what we're all hearing here, yes, I'm from Jerry Street.
In
Out
18:57
Yes, the project that is currently on the, um— well, actually nothing's been presented— is one of the reasons that I have an issue.
In
Out
19:04
But I want to remind this council, or this, this board, that there, there should be a plan for New Bedford, a vision for New Bedford, and we do need housing.
In
Out
19:14
We're grandfathered into the historic nature of this of this wonderful city and the parking issues that we already have in a lot of neighborhoods, including ours as well.
In
Out
19:25
I mean, let's face it, these one-family homes that we do have, we have single-family neighborhood, but there's 4 cars in a lot of houses because, you know, teenage kids are driving or whatever.
In
Out
19:34
So we have, you know, we're trying to make the best we can for what was grandfathered.
In
Out
19:39
But now for the vision and the future of New Bedford, I don't understand how we can be saying, oh, the reality is there's less cars on the road.
In
Out
19:48
Let's make, you know, let's let people build with less spaces needed.
In
Out
19:54
Let's maybe add to the congestion that we already see.
In
Out
19:58
You know, again, I'm not just talking about Jerry Street, but, you know, I know I was actually very happy to see that I believe it's Kudo Construction got a $5 million grant or something like that for an old nursing home that has ingress, egress, I mean, that can really be, you know, but, but, you know, maybe, you know, that could be again where you're looking at your site plan and things like that.
In
Out
20:19
But I feel like there's a responsibility to your constituents, to the residents of New Bedford, that we don't continue by— you know, I don't see how you're solving a problem by saying let's build more units because we have a housing crisis, but let's just sort of ignore the fact that, you know, most people are driving, most one-bedrooms are going to have 2 cars.
In
Out
20:42
And let's put that in a congested, already, you know, narrow street where if you have people on both sides— it happens to me every day now— you gotta wait.
In
Out
20:50
You're hopefully in front of someone's driveway so you can let somebody pass because you can't— 2 cars are not able to go down a lot of these really narrow streets.
In
Out
20:58
And I don't see what the vision is and what you're thinking here.
In
Out
21:02
And just to piggyback off, I believe it was, uh, Councilor Abreu said, um, I believe— and I haven't seen the motion or the draft of this change in the ordinance, but I believe it's by right.
In
Out
21:16
So no site plan review can be limited.
In
Out
21:19
Is it not by right?
In
Out
21:21
Is it by— are you going to give this change in parking— it's— if it's from what I'm assuming, and again, I have not seen it, are you not doing— isn't this going to be by right that it's going to be one space?
In
Out
21:34
So you can't then come in when a developer comes in and say, oh no, we're going to change it, we really want you to have 2.
In
Out
21:39
You can't limit— and then if you're doing it by right, you can't then limit a site plan review in the planning board and say, no, no, we want more restrictions.
In
Out
21:50
What you should be doing then is proposing that the change be instead of by right to, you know, uh, 2 cars only, maybe say that, you know, in, you know, circumstances, certain circumstances, it can be by planning board or by zoning, or, you know, just like you do with any other use ordinance that you have.
In
Out
22:13
But I don't see why this is a— we're just going to change it across the board to one parking space, no vision, no thought.
In
Out
22:21
I mean, let's face it, this is 2026.
In
Out
22:24
Very few people don't have more than a, a 2-car family or a 2-car dwelling.
In
Out
22:31
And again, I think that we need to have a little bit more vision and plan for the city of New Bedford.
In
Out
22:38
Oh, and it's like I said, I've lived in Boston.
In
Out
22:41
I had to get my Charlestown ticket.
In
Out
22:43
I had to get my South Boston.
In
Out
22:44
Are we going to now soon?
In
Out
22:45
I mean, soon what we're going to do is we're going to all have to have parking permits and, you know, guest spots.
In
Out
22:51
And it's going to be, you know, that whole thing.
In
Out
22:54
I mean, I just— I foresee just problems and problems and problems if we— we should be being really careful with the changes that we're making.
In
Out
23:03
So thank you.
In
Out
23:04
Thank you.
In
Out
23:07
Anybody else would like to speak?
In
Out
23:11
Councilor Abril?
In
Out
23:12
No, I just want to mention something because I was, uh, mentioned by name, and she is absolutely correct.
In
Out
23:18
The resident is correct.
In
Out
23:20
What I'm talking about is we're seeing it currently right now before the planning board where you can mandate that the developer figure out and find out parking offsite for their tenants.
In
Out
23:33
We're seeing it right now on the planning board with one of the developments from Ronald Oliveira, for example, that's happening, which I know several others— excuse me— in this body are aware about as well.
In
Out
23:43
That's been kind of a back and forth.
In
Out
23:45
So you can mandate that, okay, you know, we have the 22 parking spots here, but the planning board can say, but for you to go forward, we need to have 20 more spots somewhere.
In
Out
23:56
We've got to find somewhere nearby where you can rent or whatever the case may be.
In
Out
24:00
So that's what I'm talking about.
In
Out
24:02
That could be part of the process.
In
Out
24:03
That could be litigated in planning.
In
Out
24:05
So that's the point that I'm making.
In
Out
24:06
It's been done.
In
Out
24:07
It's happening right now.
In
Out
24:09
And it could happen here as well.
In
Out
24:10
Thank you.
In
Out
24:13
Sorry, I just want to— and again, maybe I didn't think that the planning board could do that.
In
Out
24:18
If you're giving them a right to 2, how can you say no, it's no, we're going to make it a right to 1.
In
Out
24:24
But, you know, now we're going to add this extra limitation when it's by right.
In
Out
24:29
Again, I still don't understand how the planning board has any authority if the ordinance that you're going to put in place says one per spot.
In
Out
24:36
So I think you've got to be really careful with what you do.
In
Out
24:38
Thank you.
In
Out
24:39
Thank you, Councilmember.
In
Out
24:42
I just want to remind those in the chamber as well, because we do have a number of people here that haven't spoken.
In
Out
24:47
They might not feel comfortable sharing any testimony, but if they are here to speak out against the change in the ordinance, I ask that they record themselves against it.
In
Out
25:00
That is also an option for those in the chamber that don't feel comfortable getting up there to, to share anything, that they can just stand up and say, I'm Shane Burgo and I want to be recorded against or in favor of said ordinance.
In
Out
25:13
That's also an option for those that are in the room today as well.
In
Out
25:17
Yes, we can do that.
In
Out
25:19
I will allow that.
In
Out
25:21
So, um, anybody else want to speak before I record?
In
Out
25:27
Would you like to read?
In
Out
25:29
Okay, you're on the list, so— and you made me cross you off.
In
Out
25:32
Now you're back up.
In
Out
25:33
Yeah.
In
Out
25:35
Um, okay, Beth Kalanowicz, 220 Appleton Street.
In
Out
25:40
Um, we do not have sidewalks on our street.
In
Out
25:45
In the summer— well, not summer, spring, fall— there are families walking their dogs, walking their babies.
In
Out
25:53
There are children playing up and down the street constantly.
In
Out
25:58
There's no sidewalks to walk those dogs or, or their children.
In
Out
26:03
So if you put more cars there, where are these people going to go?
In
Out
26:12
So I just, like I said, I didn't expect to speak, but I just thought of that while I was there.
In
Out
26:21
Thank you, Beth.
In
Out
26:26
Does anybody else want to speak?
In
Out
26:30
Okay, at this time, is there— I'll take names and we record you whether or not you're in favor again.
In
Out
26:38
So first of all, I'll ask Is anybody in favor?
In
Out
26:44
Anybody in favor be recorded in favor.
In
Out
26:46
Okay.
In
Out
26:47
Anybody want to be recorded against?
In
Out
26:52
In favor of the ordinance.
In
Out
26:53
You got to give both sides.
In
Out
26:55
In favor of the ordinance.
In
Out
26:57
The parking ordinance.
In
Out
26:58
Correct.
In
Out
27:00
Yes.
In
Out
27:01
All right.
In
Out
27:02
So folks that are against, raise their hand.
In
Out
27:06
Okay.
In
Out
27:06
So we're going to start recording you.
In
Out
27:08
Name.
In
Out
27:08
If you've already spoke, you don't have to be recorded.
In
Out
27:11
Okay.
In
Out
27:11
Joseph Steylin.
In
Out
27:13
Joseph Steylin.
In
Out
27:17
S-T-E-Y-L-I-N. Who's— who's what?
In
Out
27:24
Against.
In
Out
27:28
We're doing all against right now.
In
Out
27:34
Carol Mendoza.
In
Out
27:48
Okay, Mr. Chabner, you're— Mr. Chabner, you've already spoken, so we're good with you.
In
Out
27:54
What was your last name again?
In
Out
27:57
Machado.
In
Out
27:59
Okay.
In
Out
28:00
Yeah, move your head.
In
Out
28:06
Lori Preston.
In
Out
28:08
Lori Preston, right?
In
Out
28:12
Pamela St. Louis.
In
Out
28:14
Pamela St. Louis.
In
Out
28:17
Christopher Souza.
In
Out
28:20
S or Z?
In
Out
28:21
Z.
In
Out
28:22
Thank you.
In
Out
28:24
Wayne Kalaniewicz.
In
Out
28:32
Lois Tryer.
In
Out
28:33
What was your last name?
In
Out
28:37
Tryer.
In
Out
28:38
Like in court?
In
Out
28:42
No.
In
Out
28:46
Okay, as— okay, one more round.
In
Out
28:49
Does anybody else want to speak?
In
Out
28:50
Any councilors?
In
Out
28:51
Yes.
In
Out
28:53
Yes, you know, you need to come to the podium if you want to speak.
In
Out
28:58
You should know that.
In
Out
29:04
So I, I too— first of all, I want to welcome our former Ward 4 city councilor.
In
Out
29:10
Thank you.
In
Out
29:11
I too want to thank the councilors for giving us this opportunity tonight to speak.
In
Out
29:16
It's very important.
In
Out
29:17
It's very important to hear from the people, right?
In
Out
29:22
That's why you guys are here, and that's why we're here, to have dialogue, to talk about things that we think that aren't appropriate for our neighborhood.
In
Out
29:32
And that's what this is all about.
In
Out
29:35
I don't, as well as my neighbors, don't think this is appropriate for our neighborhood.
In
Out
29:40
The change, the parking change, is going to in effect fast-track this development, which is going to be a nightmare for our neighborhood.
In
Out
29:52
A nightmare.
In
Out
29:53
We had the most snow we've had in many years.
In
Out
29:56
Where did people park?
In
Out
29:58
Over 2,000 tickets were issued, from what I understand, because people couldn't find places to park their vehicles.
In
Out
30:06
And that's just one thing.
In
Out
30:08
You talk about folks that are walking their children.
In
Out
30:10
I see it every day in the summertime, walking, riding their bicycles or whatever.
In
Out
30:15
There's no sidewalks mostly in our neighborhood.
In
Out
30:19
You know, the mayor said on BSM a few weeks ago that this wouldn't affect single-family neighborhoods.
In
Out
30:29
Well, this is a single-family neighborhood and this is going to affect that.
In
Out
30:34
And so I am totally against this.
In
Out
30:36
I want to thank you for giving us the opportunity to speak today, because I think it's important.
In
Out
30:43
As, uh, Councilor Choquette said, it's our democratic process that allows us to do this, and I thank you for giving us this opportunity.
In
Out
30:52
Thank you, Councilor.
In
Out
31:00
Councilor Oliver, would you like the floor?
In
Out
31:03
Um, I, I was just gonna— with, with that being said, I was just gonna make a motion to, um, referral to the full city council, uh, taking no further action on this at this time.
In
Out
31:14
And I'd like to speak on that when able to.
In
Out
31:18
Yeah, no, yeah, go ahead.
In
Out
31:24
Councilor made by— motion was made by Councilor Oliver, second by Councilor April.
In
Out
31:30
On the question.
In
Out
31:32
Thank you, Madam Chair.
In
Out
31:34
I know we normally don't speak on, on, on the— on no final action, but I think this is something that is a little bit unique.
In
Out
31:41
And, you know, who cares really?
In
Out
31:43
We're gonna speak for the people and speak for this process.
In
Out
31:49
So I know that folks may hear it as no further action, and I think that that gets mistaken as we're not doing anything.
In
Out
31:58
That is not what it is.
In
Out
32:00
This is just to discharge it from the committee.
In
Out
32:04
That's how our process works.
In
Out
32:08
Obviously, I think all my colleagues that are in attendance tonight have taken what this neighborhood has said, and it's, you know, now up to this body to make any changes or amendments in which they feel is warranted.
In
Out
32:26
I'm not sure if any of those will come forward, but I think that the comments that were stated here tonight were, were well received by this body.
In
Out
32:35
And again, just because we're taking no further action tonight, merely just to discharge it from this committee, um, doesn't mean that action still can't be taken before the vote on February 12th.
In
Out
32:51
So I just wanted to do that for, for clarity.
In
Out
32:54
That's all.
In
Out
32:54
So thank you for the opportunity to do that.
In
Out
32:57
Thank you, Councilor Oliver.
In
Out
32:58
Anybody else on the question?
In
Out
33:02
Seeing none, all in favor— we have to take the vote first.
In
Out
33:06
All in favor of no further action say aye.
In
Out
33:09
Aye.
In
Out
33:09
Opposed?
In
Out
33:10
The ayes have it.
In
Out
33:12
Motion made to adjourn by Councilor Abreu, second by Councilor Bergo.
In
Out
33:16
All in favor say aye.
In
Out
33:17
Aye.
In
Out
33:18
Opposed?
In
Out
33:18
The ayes have it.
In
Out
33:19
Thank you all for coming.
In
Out
33:21
We're adjourned at 7:33 PM.
In
Out
33:25
Residents, again, thank you for coming.
In
Out