City of New Bedford Meetings
Search and subscribe to city meeting topics that impact you
Newsletters
Subscribe
← Back to video
Appointments & Briefings Committee — July 21, 2026
−
Fit
+
IN
0:00
OUT
0:00
Length
0:00
▶ Play selection
Export clip
Keyboard:
I
set in,
O
set out,
←
/
→
nudge playhead 5s.
0:32
Okay, colleagues and guests, welcome to the Committee on Appointments and Briefings.
In
Out
0:46
It is July 21st, 2026.
In
Out
0:49
This meeting's at 7:00.
In
Out
0:51
Here in Room 214 at City Hall Chambers.
In
Out
0:55
In the, in the, uh, my colleagues in government that are present: Councilor Abril, Councilor-at-Large, Councilor Ward 2 Scott Pemberton, Councilor Ward 1 Leo Choquette, Councilor Ward 5 Joseph Lopes, Councilor Ward 6 Ryan Pereira, Councilor-at-Large James Roy, Councilor Ward 3 Sean Oliver, and Councilor Ward 4 Derek Baptiste.
In
Out
1:18
Thank you all for coming.
In
Out
1:19
Note, this meeting is being live streamed and recorded.
In
Out
1:22
City Council and committee meetings can be viewed on the City of New Bedford's homepage under Quick Links, then Meetings.
In
Out
1:29
Thank you all for coming.
In
Out
1:30
Do we have anything to read in the record?
In
Out
1:31
I have one letter to read into the record from Councilor President— excuse me, I'm sorry, Councilor Shane Burgo, First Vice President.
In
Out
1:39
Sorry, Mr. President, sorry about that.
In
Out
1:46
Hey, I'll, I'll be leaving now.
In
Out
1:55
Um, I am writing to inform you that, uh, regretfully I will be late to the Committee on Appointments and Briefings meeting on Tuesday, July 21st, 2026, due to attending a neighborhood community meeting.
In
Out
2:06
Please read this letter into the record to make my colleagues and the public Aware of the reason for my absence.
In
Out
2:11
Sincerely, Shane Burgo, First Vice President of the New Bedford City Council.
In
Out
2:15
Motion to receive and place on file.
In
Out
2:18
Motion made by Sean Oliver, seconded by Ryan Pereira.
In
Out
2:21
All in favor say aye.
In
Out
2:23
Opposed?
In
Out
2:23
The ayes have it.
In
Out
2:24
Number 1 is now before us.
In
Out
2:26
Item number 1 is citizens input time.
In
Out
2:28
And I've got a text from Mr. Lamontagne today who said that he will not be coming this evening.
In
Out
2:35
So we're on to, on to number 2.
In
Out
2:38
You can table or refer.
In
Out
2:41
No further action.
In
Out
2:42
If I get a motion— motion made for no further action, made by Councilor Baptiste, seconded by Councilor Abreu.
In
Out
2:48
All in favor say aye.
In
Out
2:49
Opposed?
In
Out
2:50
The ayes have it.
In
Out
2:52
Item number 2 is a public hearing on a communication, demolition, New Bedford Historical Commission to the City Council, read, building demolition review of 535 Brock Avenue, Map 11, Lot 56, a circa 1840-1854 carriage barn later converted to a 2-story residence.
In
Out
3:10
The Coffin Howland is a contributing resource to the Hazelwood Park National Register.
In
Out
3:16
The building is significant in its association with the Joseph Howland estate, which later became Hazelwood Park.
In
Out
3:23
The building experienced a significant fire decades ago and was boarded up and fenced off to deter ongoing vandalism and long-term deferred maintenance.
In
Out
3:32
In addition to the fire damage and the collapsed roof, it does not make the building a good candidate for restoration.
In
Out
3:39
The demolition of the Coffin-Holland House removes a dangerous safety hazard from a public park, and the planning for the reconstruction of a similarly scaled and architecturally sensitive building on the footprint of the house has been ongoing.
In
Out
3:55
In light of these findings, the New Bedford Historical Commission has determined that the building at 535 Brock Avenue, known as the Coffin Howland House, is historically significant but not preferably preserved building.
In
Out
4:09
It was referred to the council on June 11, 2026.
In
Out
4:13
It was advertised in the Standard Times on Thursday, June 7, 2026, and the public hearing is now before you to be opened.
In
Out
4:20
Motion to open the public hearing.
In
Out
4:22
Motion's been made to receive and place on file the communication and open the public hearing, made by Councilor Pereira, seconded by Councilor Roy.
In
Out
4:30
All in favor say aye.
In
Out
4:32
Opposed?
In
Out
4:33
The ayes have it.
In
Out
4:34
The public hearing is now open.
In
Out
4:36
And you're on.
In
Out
4:48
Good evening, Madam Chair, honorable councillors.
In
Out
4:51
Um, you should have a copy of the Historical Commission staff report which lays out the condition of the property, the subject property, as well as the charac— the characterization of finding it historically significant but not preferably preserved, which is part of our ordinance.
In
Out
5:13
Um, that portion of the ordinance does call for a public hearing, which is why we're here today to discuss the property, and I am here to answer any questions that you may have.
In
Out
5:32
Yes, motion receiving place on file made by Councilor Lopes, second by Councilor Pereira.
In
Out
5:37
All in favor say aye.
In
Out
5:38
Opposed?
In
Out
5:38
The ayes have it.
In
Out
5:40
Councillor April.
In
Out
5:42
Thank you, Madam Chair.
In
Out
5:43
Good evening, Anne.
In
Out
5:44
Thanks for, uh, coming in.
In
Out
5:46
Just a couple of questions.
In
Out
5:47
Um, before recommending the demolition— and someone who's been a lifelong Southender, obviously this, this property, this house is near and dear to me, and I'm sure many others in this room— um, before recommending the demolition, uh, were there any type of, um, restoration or, uh, maybe stabilization alternatives evaluated in this process?
In
Out
6:11
Yes.
In
Out
6:11
So let me give you some background, some context.
In
Out
6:18
I have been the preservation planner for 20 years.
In
Out
6:22
And one of the first things that we did when I came in under the last administration was to nominate the park to be a National Register site so that we could then be eligible for funding, for grant funding.
In
Out
6:42
We're a city with limited financial resources to restore buildings of this magnitude.
In
Out
6:51
I can tell you 20 years ago this building was in very poor shape at the time.
In
Out
6:56
It is continuously deteriorated.
In
Out
7:00
I would say even 20 years ago, with, with very little grant funding that we had, we would not have been able to restore the building.
In
Out
7:08
We would probably have to rebuild it even 20 years ago.
In
Out
7:13
It was in that, that poor of shape.
In
Out
7:15
I can tell you, again, because of limited resources and limited grant funding available, we have allocated those resources towards what is referred to as the stone house because that property structurally was in very good shape and it is buttoned— what we would call buttoned up right now.
In
Out
7:38
Okay.
In
Out
7:39
Thank you for that detailed response.
In
Out
7:41
The report that I've read and you alluded to, it does mention to reconstruct a similarly scaled or architecturally sensitive replacement building, if you will.
In
Out
7:56
Can you just describe again at 30,000 feet kind of what that reconstruction would look like, given the fact that it is a sensitive topic for a lot of South Enders and folks who live on the peninsula who grew up, you know, admiring this structure and being in and around it?
In
Out
8:11
So just wondering what the conversations have been surrounding that issue.
In
Out
8:15
Yeah.
In
Out
8:15
So when we say we have plans, they're very general plans.
In
Out
8:19
Schematic in scale.
In
Out
8:21
You know, we're looking at— we do not want to recreate the building.
In
Out
8:27
Typically in historic preservation, that's not something that's generally looked at favorably.
In
Out
8:32
It's kind of— we call it Disneyland.
In
Out
8:35
So again, any type of building that would be replaced would obviously be of similar scale because you don't— you want to fit the context of what was there and what currently exists in the park and not have anything overpowering.
In
Out
8:51
But it would generally, again, fit the same footprint, mass, scale, size, architectural stylistics of the historic building, but not an exact replica.
In
Out
9:06
Okay.
In
Out
9:07
As this process kind of evolves, I'd recommend maybe— maybe you already have, but I don't think so— maybe consulting or engaging the neighborhood residents through the— not the Clark's Point Neighborhood Association anymore, it's the Peninsula Neighborhood Association now.
In
Out
9:23
Not to have them at the table as far as construction and design, but maybe just to solicit some feedback and see what their thoughts are from the neighborhood and the community down there who has to live and look at it every day and walk by it and congregate.
In
Out
9:36
Is that something that you'd be willing to do with your team?
In
Out
9:38
I do want to state that I am not the lead on this project.
In
Out
9:42
I am obviously here in the role of representing the Historical Commission.
In
Out
9:46
This is a park property, so the Parks Department and Department of Facilities and Fleet Management are the leads on, on the project.
In
Out
9:55
No, I understand, but respectfully, you're the representative here, so you're the only one I can ask.
In
Out
9:59
So you understand, I will pass that on.
In
Out
10:01
I appreciate that.
In
Out
10:02
Thank you.
In
Out
10:02
And now I can follow up with you as this problem— this not problem, but this process goes through.
In
Out
10:07
Um, yeah, no, I think that's all I have.
In
Out
10:13
Um, oh, um, the reconstruction plans, um, uh, they would return to the Historical Commission, correct?
In
Out
10:19
Or to the City Council for additional review?
In
Out
10:22
I'm sorry, the, the reconstruction plans, would they come back before this body or the Historical Commission?
In
Out
10:28
No, that would— that's, that's not required.
In
Out
10:31
I didn't think so.
In
Out
10:32
Okay.
In
Out
10:33
I've never dealt with this before, so— yeah, and I do want to state there is no identified funding for reconstruction.
In
Out
10:39
There's only been preliminary schematic plans.
In
Out
10:44
So, um, but the building, we're seeking demolition now because the funding for that does exist and it is a health and safety hazard.
In
Out
10:54
No, I get it.
In
Out
10:55
Okay, I get it's got to come down.
In
Out
10:56
I'm not fighting for it to stay up.
In
Out
10:58
It's eyesore.
In
Out
10:59
It needs to come down.
In
Out
11:01
I just, you know, we're big on history in the city, in particular on the peninsula and everywhere— the downtown, the North End, the West End.
In
Out
11:07
But just let's all be cognizant and respectful and mindful of that.
In
Out
11:11
I know you are in your role.
In
Out
11:12
You've always been so.
In
Out
11:13
So thank you for your time, Anne.
In
Out
11:15
Appreciate it.
In
Out
11:16
Thank you, Madam Chair.
In
Out
11:17
I'll yield at this time.
In
Out
11:18
Thank you, Councilor Abreu.
In
Out
11:20
Next we have Councilor Oliver.
In
Out
11:22
Thank you, um, Madam Chair.
In
Out
11:24
Thank you for being here.
In
Out
11:27
Although not in my ward, I grew up down in the South End.
In
Out
11:30
I still have a lot of family down there.
In
Out
11:33
So I spent a lot of summers in that park.
In
Out
11:37
My questions are cost for the demo and what funding— what is the funding mechanism?
In
Out
11:46
Again, I don't— I don't have that information readily available.
In
Out
11:50
That's came from DFFM.
In
Out
11:53
They're handling that.
In
Out
11:55
So I know it's— I know obviously it's, it's available because that's why we're going forward, but I don't know the source or the, the full amount.
In
Out
12:04
I know that the property requires certain abatement, so those costs are associated with it as well.
In
Out
12:11
So it's not just the demolition, it's demolition and abatement.
In
Out
12:14
Do you know if the city will be handling the demo, or are Is this something that we're looking to sub out?
In
Out
12:19
I think they're exploring both at this point in time.
In
Out
12:22
Okay.
In
Out
12:23
And did anybody tell you— talk to you about a timeline if the demolition is granted?
In
Out
12:29
I think it's relatively soon because I'm being badgered as to when this approval is going to take place.
In
Out
12:35
So I think— okay.
In
Out
12:37
Yes.
In
Out
12:38
And then I know that it was said there was kind of primitive talks about some sort of structure there.
In
Out
12:48
To kind of highlight what once was.
In
Out
12:52
Do you know of any other conversations that were had, or of maybe even if it's just something, a, you know, some sort of plaque or something like that?
In
Out
13:01
Because funding is difficult for larger-scale projects like this.
In
Out
13:07
So you're saying not— instead of replacing it with some sort of structure, we don't have to.
In
Out
13:12
Oh yeah, no.
In
Out
13:14
That's absolutely correct.
In
Out
13:15
So if, if, if the budget— there's no budget, obviously, to, to reconstruct a building on that site, then I think having some type of historical interpretation through, like, a wayside panel that you see often on sidewalks is something that the city could do.
In
Out
13:33
And I think that's a great idea.
In
Out
13:34
Yeah.
In
Out
13:34
Okay.
In
Out
13:35
Long and the short of it, the building is in absolute terrible condition.
In
Out
13:40
A safety hazard, it's a fire hazard, it's all, all the hazards.
In
Out
13:43
Sadly, it's got to come down.
In
Out
13:45
Sadly, yes.
In
Out
13:46
Okay, thank you.
In
Out
13:47
Very hard for me to say that.
In
Out
13:48
Yeah, thank you, uh, for, for all that.
In
Out
13:50
Thank you, Mr.— Madam Chair.
In
Out
13:52
Thank you, Councilor Oliver.
In
Out
13:53
Councilor Pemberton.
In
Out
13:55
Thank you, Madam Chairman.
In
Out
13:56
Hi, Anna, how you doing?
In
Out
13:58
Uh, just a little curious is why have we waited so long?
In
Out
14:02
Why all this time and we decided to take it down?
In
Out
14:06
Especially if it had such, uh, you know, historical value and stuff, why didn't we do anything in the beginning?
In
Out
14:12
And, you know, why do we wait all those years?
In
Out
14:15
So I, I want to be clear that we did, we, we did look into throughout the years— this is going back in, at least for me, 20 years— um, for, for the park and both buildings, not just the efforts into the stone building, but both buildings.
In
Out
14:34
We did structural assessments of the building, of the cottage.
In
Out
14:42
We actually tore down, I think about 2015, one section that was very, very badly damaged.
In
Out
14:52
I think, to be honest with you, there was always the hope that we would find some source of funding to rehabilitate that building.
In
Out
15:03
I think once we started working on the stone building, because the stone building we've also done, have completed planning for its reuse, that's in much better shape.
In
Out
15:16
At the same time, we're looking at the cottage and realized very quickly that it was beyond repair.
In
Out
15:23
So I think it was a lot of, as Councilor Abrams was saying, um, feeling and, and understanding that we really, um, take care or have a lot of care and feelings for our historic buildings.
In
Out
15:40
And there was always a hope that we could restore it and just realized we couldn't.
In
Out
15:47
Thank you.
In
Out
15:47
I just, like I said, I was just curious of why we waited so long.
In
Out
15:50
By now.
In
Out
15:50
But thank you.
In
Out
15:51
Thank you, Madam Chairman.
In
Out
15:53
Thank you, Councilor Pemberton.
In
Out
15:54
Council President Pereira.
In
Out
15:57
Thank you, Madam Chair.
In
Out
15:59
So I'm sure you're gonna share many of the sentiments I have about this house, so I'm not gonna— I'll get off my soapbox pretty quickly.
In
Out
16:08
But I— this is a tough vote for me to vote yes on this.
In
Out
16:15
This is a very important piece of of pride for many folks who grew up on the peninsula or in the South End who frequented Hazelwood Park.
In
Out
16:25
Many of our city residents who frequent Hazelwood Park and look at those beautiful homes, and it's a very, very large point of pride for a lot of us who live down there.
In
Out
16:36
In a little bit, when the pub— as the public hearing continues, I'm going to submit testimony that the council received via email from Mr. Mirage that lives on Valentine Street.
In
Out
16:47
And, um, what, what I will state is I share a lot of his anger and frustration.
In
Out
16:55
Um, I believe it was less than a year ago there was discussions that I was included in with the administration to still save this building, trying to get grants, because it is going to be— it would be a costly, uh, process to save the building.
In
Out
17:11
Abatements still need to occur, obviously, with health issues and hazards, and then obviously extensive repair.
In
Out
17:17
But walking through the park just last Saturday, uh, Saturday, um, the, the building is just in deplorable condition.
In
Out
17:29
It, it's, it's disgraceful.
In
Out
17:31
I know you probably agree, um, and, and it's sad to see such a beautiful building have to come down.
In
Out
17:42
But when you do these reports on behalf of the Historical Commission, when you, when you give them recommendations, when you put these forward, as you do for many buildings in the city, you— how much does condition go into the thought process of making your recommendation?
In
Out
18:00
Oh, it weighs heavily.
In
Out
18:01
For example, I will be clear, If, if this demolition was denied today and you folks came up with a pot of money to restore it, guess what?
In
Out
18:16
We're, we're knocking it down to restore it.
In
Out
18:19
There's no way around it.
In
Out
18:21
The assessment that we've done just for abatement purposes demonstrates that we would have to knock all— the roof has collapsed into itself.
In
Out
18:30
Itself.
In
Out
18:31
You can't, you can't even enter into the building.
In
Out
18:35
But between the existing windows and the, the materials that are hazardous, hazardous, that we would have to knock the building down and rebuild it.
In
Out
18:45
Yeah, I'm gonna— that's, that's the honest answer at this point in time.
In
Out
18:48
Yeah, I, I— the, the— especially on the west side, I think is the worst side, right?
In
Out
18:54
Yeah, yeah.
In
Out
18:55
I mean, the whole building, but the west side I think side the roof collapsed in on.
In
Out
18:58
It's, it's tough.
In
Out
18:59
It's tough because it's such a beautiful— yeah, part of that park.
In
Out
19:02
And, and, um, but at this point, to y'all, to your point, um, I, I'm in agreeance that at this point there is no way to salvage that building.
In
Out
19:10
And it's, it's a shame it got this far.
In
Out
19:13
Um, but, uh, thank you.
In
Out
19:15
I appreciate your, uh, answering my question.
In
Out
19:17
Just, uh, one last request.
In
Out
19:19
Could you— I, I know you're not handling it, but Uh, to, to the councilor from Ward 3's question.
In
Out
19:25
Could you inquire with the various parties and provide at some point the costs associated with this?
In
Out
19:31
I will coordinate that with them first thing tomorrow.
In
Out
19:34
Provide it with the clerk's office and absolutely— okay, thanks, Anne.
In
Out
19:38
Thank you, Madam Chair.
In
Out
19:39
Thanks to Councilor Pereira.
In
Out
19:41
Councilor Pereira, did you— were you going to read that receiving place on file?
In
Out
19:44
I was gonna— yeah, that's fine.
In
Out
19:46
I was just gonna— I can have the clerk do it.
In
Out
19:47
Yeah, that's Okay, I was just gonna wait till if any of my colleagues had any other questions and then allow that.
In
Out
19:53
Okay, Councilor Abram.
In
Out
19:54
Just on my second, if that's okay.
In
Out
19:57
Just based on what we heard my colleague, my fellow South End colleague say, he's correct.
In
Out
20:02
And I just want to drive home again, please, please, can you pass the message along?
In
Out
20:06
The South End residents have to be involved in this process.
In
Out
20:10
I'm not saying that they're the ones to make the final arbiters of what we do and how we do it, But they have to be heard.
In
Out
20:16
That's all.
In
Out
20:17
No.
In
Out
20:18
Yeah.
In
Out
20:18
And he's dead on.
In
Out
20:19
And we live down there.
In
Out
20:21
We know these people.
In
Out
20:22
They're amongst— we go to these meetings.
In
Out
20:23
You know how it is.
In
Out
20:24
I go to those meetings.
In
Out
20:25
I haven't seen you in a while.
In
Out
20:28
I have not been in a while.
In
Out
20:30
But, well, there's a new group.
In
Out
20:31
I enjoy the South End meetings.
In
Out
20:33
Yeah, well, there's a new group now.
In
Out
20:35
They're great.
In
Out
20:36
So Judy Christopher will get you on her list.
In
Out
20:37
Invite me.
In
Out
20:38
I'll tell her to reach out to you.
In
Out
20:40
Thanks, Anne.
In
Out
20:41
Thank you, Madam Chair.
In
Out
20:42
Thank you, Councilor Abreu.
In
Out
20:44
Councilor Lopes.
In
Out
20:45
So, and thank you.
In
Out
20:47
Me and you have spent countless summer days there, and I remember sharing the story when I was in middle school, junior high, I went to school with the last park caretaker's daughter.
In
Out
20:58
I went to a party in that house.
In
Out
21:00
So, and we said this on a, on an August Sunday, this was at the time 30 years of every mayor's neglect.
In
Out
21:09
And if we had historical— the, the money that we have today 30 years ago, something like this potentially could have been saved.
In
Out
21:18
Because I remember we looked at how do we replicate the, the boarding on the outside in case we are able to get the money.
In
Out
21:28
And then it was there's lead paint, there's this, there's that.
In
Out
21:32
And then we looked at— and I think it was 2013 we took off the nonhistorical component and we got money from Pat Sullivan.
In
Out
21:41
And, and in 2015, we had applied for a park grant that was denied.
In
Out
21:46
So your office, I will tell you, previously when I was the Ward 6 councilor, you worked tirelessly to put every possibility to save that building.
In
Out
21:55
And I, I just want to commend you for the work that you did during my tenure to try to save that building because you knew that there was nothing else in the area that could replicate the history that that building had.
In
Out
22:07
But, you know, neglect from every administration prior let it, let it get to where it is today.
In
Out
22:14
But I just want to thank you for all that you did for all the years before to try to get every dime possible to, to save it before it got to the condition where the roof imploded.
In
Out
22:24
So thank you, Laura.
In
Out
22:25
I appreciate that.
In
Out
22:27
Thank you, Madam Chair.
In
Out
22:28
Thank you, Councilor Lopes.
In
Out
22:30
Does anybody else have any more questions for Miss Laurel?
In
Out
22:36
Okay, I would— Comish, I know you're here.
In
Out
22:38
Would you like to give us a little insight on your evaluation of this?
In
Out
23:00
Do you have a little background you want to give to us on the building?
In
Out
23:08
Well, everything that Anne said to you is right on.
In
Out
23:14
I've been here as long as she has.
In
Out
23:19
Used to house, I believe his name was Mr. Lowney.
In
Out
23:23
Yeah, and, um, it's a great building, but unfortunately, should have, would have, could have, but it hasn't been done.
In
Out
23:29
And it, it's at a state of disrepair now that it's a safety hazard for anybody that gets there, and, and we don't want anybody getting hurt.
In
Out
23:37
So it just has to come down.
In
Out
23:39
It's a shame, but, um, well, we tried our best to get it back to what it was at one time.
In
Out
23:46
We used to say it was like the House of Seven Gables.
In
Out
23:49
But it, uh, it didn't, didn't work out for the city, unfortunately.
In
Out
23:55
Yeah.
In
Out
23:56
Okay, Ian.
In
Out
23:58
Thank you, Naomi.
In
Out
24:00
Oh, Councilor Abrams, I'm sorry, teasing you.
In
Out
24:08
It's a committee.
In
Out
24:09
Anyway, thank you, Madam Chair.
In
Out
24:11
Um, you're welcome, Councilor.
In
Out
24:13
Thank you, Madam.
In
Out
24:16
Danny, I know that you had mentioned to me, not on the record, but over here, that there were several times you had to board the place up.
In
Out
24:23
And obviously it's in very disrepair.
In
Out
24:26
I know you're not in law enforcement, but have there been any homeless issues there where folks have snuck in and maybe made a fire or were living, congregating?
In
Out
24:34
And that's obviously a hazard, and it's dangerous for anyone who could be trying to sneak in there, but maybe to get away from the rain, the snow, the cold.
In
Out
24:41
Has there been any problems as it relates to that issue?
In
Out
24:45
Well, at one time we did board it up, um, because somebody did break in.
In
Out
24:49
We were afraid that they were going to torch it.
In
Out
24:51
So that was many, many moons ago.
In
Out
24:54
Um, but the past few years there hasn't been any complaints from the neighborhood.
In
Out
25:00
The, the neighbors watch it diligently.
In
Out
25:03
So if somebody was inside there, we would know the next morning or that night.
In
Out
25:07
Okay.
In
Out
25:08
That was all I wanted to be clear because I, I can't speak to anyone else, but I haven't heard of anything.
In
Out
25:13
But I didn't know if you, you know.
In
Out
25:15
All right, thank you.
In
Out
25:16
Thank you, Madam Chair.
In
Out
25:16
That's it.
In
Out
25:17
Thank you, Councilor Abreu.
In
Out
25:21
Anybody else have any, um, questions for the commissioner?
In
Out
25:26
Thank you, Commissioner, for your input.
In
Out
25:28
Everybody have a good night.
In
Out
25:31
Okay, this is a public hearing.
In
Out
25:33
Um, Madam Chair, I'd like to— I'd like to receive and place on file the testimony received from, uh, Gary Mirage on Valentine Street.
In
Out
25:40
Okay, made it— made by Councilor Perez, second by Councilor Lopes.
In
Out
25:45
All in favor say aye.
In
Out
25:46
Aye.
In
Out
25:46
Opposed?
In
Out
25:46
The ayes have it.
In
Out
25:47
Would you like to read it?
In
Out
25:47
Could the clerk read it if that's okay?
In
Out
25:49
Yes.
In
Out
25:50
Thank you.
In
Out
25:53
No, this is an email from, uh, G— Gary Moraes.
In
Out
26:04
For many decades, it seems the Coffin-Holland House has been the victim of short-term planning by some and long-term planned obsolescence by others.
In
Out
26:15
That is how it appears given the constant lack of executing building stabilization in the face of continued decay and neglect.
In
Out
26:23
Unfortunately, this is not the only city historic site that has fallen by the wayside.
In
Out
26:27
It seems there has often been an unrealistic presentation of narrow choices to save meaningful sites.
In
Out
26:35
When the need presents itself, stabilization first, then alternative recovery use makes more sense than simple abandonment to decay.
In
Out
26:44
Once the site, due to systematic neglect, becomes unsavable, given cost issues, the innovative city reuse is much more beneficial.
In
Out
26:54
Official project.
In
Out
26:56
To be sure, we need not to be in the situation we are today, but we are here nevertheless.
In
Out
27:05
Going forward, a new life for the site to bring essential stable restrooms and a visitor center is a meaningful and a badly needed improvement to Hazelwood Park, whose park guests frequently now use trees for their restroom relief.
In
Out
27:20
Hopefully a new building will be simple and evoke the style of the original building without the need for insisted historical minutiae used many times to just to prolong the decay of the building until the only choice was to tear it down.
In
Out
27:37
So tear it down, but rebuild a simple restroom building in a simple cottage style in its place.
In
Out
27:43
You can look to Bristol, Rhode Island for an example.
In
Out
27:46
Of purposeful building reuse.
In
Out
27:48
Their Waterside Park restrooms made from an old utility building can serve as an inspiration for Hazelwood Park.
In
Out
27:56
What appears as purposeful City Park Department neglect and the absurd, unrealistic, and unnecessary binary choice that discredits an Historic Commission excuse, cover story used for these past several years has been infuriating.
In
Out
28:14
Gary Amorez, Valentine Street, New Bedford, Mass.
In
Out
28:19
Thank you.
In
Out
28:21
Okay, this is a public hearing and we allow the people in the audience to speak, so I'm looking if anybody's willing to speak in favor.
In
Out
28:40
Good evening, Mr. McCoy.
In
Out
28:42
Would you give your name and address for the record?
In
Out
28:45
My name is John McCoy.
In
Out
28:46
I live on Lucas Street, and I've been there for 25 years.
In
Out
28:51
And I've been to at least 4 public meetings about that house.
In
Out
28:58
Of the historic part of it, that's the least historic.
In
Out
29:02
It was a barn.
In
Out
29:04
When some family member died, I built— the Conklin who owned the stone mansion or stone house built it up for his, I think it was his sister-in-law.
In
Out
29:22
But it went from a barn to a domicile.
In
Out
29:25
And then later it was used for the park superintendent.
In
Out
29:31
The Stone House is the historic one.
In
Out
29:34
That one, the president or head of the Mechanics Bank building in New Bedford in the 1840s was the bank that was making all the loans to the whaling industry, and he was the head of it.
In
Out
29:50
That's the historic part, and it's architecturally so much better.
In
Out
29:56
Just east of the barn is where the gazebo is located.
In
Out
30:05
From the gazebo without the barn there, you have this fantastic view of Clark's Cove.
In
Out
30:13
I mean, really beautiful.
In
Out
30:14
There's a lot of things that go on at that gazebo, including weddings.
In
Out
30:19
I think it would be a travesty to build another building in that spot.
In
Out
30:24
You'd spoil the view.
In
Out
30:26
There's lots of room in the park if you have to build another building, but please don't spoil the view.
In
Out
30:33
I think you could build up the gazebo in some way and maybe get some income for the city.
In
Out
30:39
I don't know.
In
Out
30:41
But certainly it would be an attraction.
In
Out
30:43
It is now, but it would be a better one.
In
Out
30:46
I mean, the view is unbelievable.
In
Out
30:49
So please don't put anything else on that spot.
In
Out
30:54
Don't waste a dime on that.
In
Out
31:01
We voted many years ago, citizens.
In
Out
31:04
I'm the only citizen here apparently that showed up.
In
Out
31:07
So I think most people in the South End have lost interest in that building.
In
Out
31:14
I for one totally concur that it should be knocked down, and that's all I have to say.
In
Out
31:21
Okay, thank you.
In
Out
31:23
You're welcome.
In
Out
31:26
Anybody else would like to speak in favor?
In
Out
31:28
Speak in favor.
In
Out
31:30
Be recorded in favor.
In
Out
31:31
Be recorded in favor.
In
Out
31:33
Speak in opposition.
In
Out
31:35
Anybody want to speak in opposition?
In
Out
31:36
Be recorded in opposition.
In
Out
31:38
At this point, I'll entertain a motion to close the public hearing.
In
Out
31:42
Motion made by Councilor April to close the public hearing, seconded by Councilor Roy.
In
Out
31:47
All in favor say aye.
In
Out
31:48
Opposed?
In
Out
31:49
The ayes have it.
In
Out
31:50
Your pleasure.
In
Out
31:51
Demolition.
In
Out
31:52
Excuse me, motion to approve the demolition.
In
Out
31:54
Motion been made to approve the demolition by Councilor Roy, seconded by Councilor Loy— Lopes, and refer to the full city council.
In
Out
32:02
And refer the— refer to the full city council.
In
Out
32:06
Thank you.
In
Out
32:07
All in favor say aye.
In
Out
32:09
Opposed?
In
Out
32:10
The ayes have it.
In
Out
32:14
Number 2 is now before us.
In
Out
32:16
I mean, number 3.
In
Out
32:17
Number 3 is a public— excuse me, a communication, Mayor Mitchell, to the City Council submitting the appointment of Justin Olson, New Bedford, Mass., to the Water Board.
In
Out
32:30
Mr. Olson will be replacing the late Patrick E. Rogers, who resigned in January 2025.
In
Out
32:36
This term will expire in April 2027.
In
Out
32:39
It was referred here on May 28th, 2026.
In
Out
32:41
Um, it was read and tabled on June 23rd, 2026, and is now before you, and it remains on the table.
In
Out
32:52
Second motion made by Councilor Lope, second by Councilor Roy.
In
Out
32:55
All in favor say aye for moving from the table.
In
Out
32:58
Opposed?
In
Out
32:58
The ayes have it.
In
Out
33:01
Mr. Olson, welcome.
In
Out
33:05
Good evening.
In
Out
33:06
State your name and address for the record.
In
Out
33:07
Yep, Justin Olson, 27 Plant Street, New Bedford, Mass.
In
Out
33:10
Okay, do you want to give us a little background why you would like to be on the Water Board?
In
Out
33:15
Sure, not a problem.
In
Out
33:16
Um, so as most of you know, I've spent almost 10 years with the Public Works DPI.
In
Out
33:21
I worked out of that facility for most of that time and side by side with the Water Department, so I've gained a lot of knowledge working shoulder to shoulder.
In
Out
33:31
My expertise was park maintenance, forestry, cemetery, and actually maintenance of the watershed areas around Quiddicus and Lakeville.
In
Out
33:38
So I spent a lot of time at pump stations, the water tower on Hathaway Road, the plant itself.
In
Out
33:44
I've worked with the superintendent, assistant superintendent, and the commissioner many times on projects.
In
Out
33:49
So I recognized the opportunity to join the board.
In
Out
33:52
So I put in my— I put my hat in the ring for it, if you will.
In
Out
33:56
So anybody have any questions?
In
Out
33:59
Councilor Lopes.
In
Out
33:59
More of a statement, Justin.
In
Out
34:01
I worked at you before, so I know how, how much you care about the city, how much you care about the water quality for the city.
In
Out
34:06
And I know as somebody that pays taxes and water bill that you're going to be mindful of all of that when you're serving on the water board.
In
Out
34:13
So I just want to thank you for stepping up, and I know that what you did before, you'll bring to to the, the Water Board in that same capacity and determination.
In
Out
34:21
So thank you.
In
Out
34:22
Thank you.
In
Out
34:22
Thank you, Madam Chair.
In
Out
34:23
Thank you, Councilor Lopes.
In
Out
34:24
Anybody else?
In
Out
34:24
Councilor Abril.
In
Out
34:25
Just a statement.
In
Out
34:25
You're a total class act.
In
Out
34:27
You're always there for me and the council and, and us for years.
In
Out
34:31
You're a true professional, and this is probably one of the easiest votes to a board or commission I've ever had.
In
Out
34:36
So you'll have my support tonight.
In
Out
34:37
You belong on that board.
In
Out
34:39
Congratulations and best of luck.
In
Out
34:40
Thanks, Justin.
In
Out
34:41
Thank you.
In
Out
34:42
Thank you, Councilor Abril.
In
Out
34:44
Anybody else?
In
Out
34:47
Councillor Choquette.
In
Out
34:49
What he said.
In
Out
34:53
Thank you.
In
Out
34:53
Ditto.
In
Out
34:54
Yeah, ditto, ditto, ditto.
In
Out
34:56
Okay, your pleasure, councillors.
In
Out
35:00
Motion made by Councillor Lopes, seconded by Councillor Abel, for a positive recommendation to the full city council.
In
Out
35:05
All in favor say aye.
In
Out
35:07
Opposed?
In
Out
35:07
The ayes have it.
In
Out
35:08
So our next council meeting is on on August 20th.
In
Out
35:13
So you can either come on August 20th and get sworn in, or you can wait and get sworn in by the clerk.
In
Out
35:19
Okay, it's up to you.
In
Out
35:20
Thank you very much.
In
Out
35:20
Yeah, I'll try to make that meeting.
In
Out
35:22
And thank, thank you so much.
In
Out
35:23
Have a great night.
In
Out
35:23
Thank you, everyone.
In
Out
35:24
All righty.
In
Out
35:25
Number 4 is a written motion.
In
Out
35:26
Councilors Lopes, Combs, Abu, Connie, Choquette, Pemberton, and Pereira requesting that representatives from Republic Waste Services, E.L. Harvey, and Waste Management attend a meeting of the New Bedford City Council's Committee on Appointments and Briefings to discuss their ongoing violations of the City of New Bedford ordinance governing waste collection and disposal operations within the city, was referred here on May 28, 2026.
In
Out
35:47
Number 4 is now before you.
In
Out
35:51
Motion made to receive and place on file, made by Councilor Lopes, seconded by Councilor Sockett.
In
Out
35:55
All in favor say aye.
In
Out
35:56
Opposed, the ayes have it.
In
Out
35:57
Councilor Lopes, um, did we receive any communication?
In
Out
36:01
Now, I've, I've spoken to Republic Waste at length since this was filed, did we receive any communications from E.L. Harvey?
In
Out
36:09
No, nothing.
In
Out
36:11
So I will tell you, and I want to thank, you know, Commissioner Romanowicz, we have worked tirelessly with Republic Waste Services, um, until we actually filed this motion and the commissioner was actually citing them for picking up dumpsters at 4:45 in the morning, 5 o'clock in the morning, and 5:15.
In
Out
36:31
There was no action.
In
Out
36:32
I spoke to the resident— sorry, I spoke to the representative from Republic Waste.
In
Out
36:38
She gave me her personal cell phone number.
In
Out
36:41
The problem is, and they're going to fix it, is they actually go into the industrial park at 3 o'clock in the morning and start picking up dumpsters.
In
Out
36:51
And when they leave the industrial park, they thought it was okay to go into the residential neighborhoods.
In
Out
36:57
And pick up dumpsters.
In
Out
37:00
And I explained to the lady that we had a city ordinance that said you can't pick up a dumpster in a residential neighborhood until 7:00 a.m. And she said, we had no knowledge of that.
In
Out
37:11
I said, that's a farce because I've spoken to your regional representative.
In
Out
37:17
I know the building commissioner has spoken to him.
In
Out
37:18
I know Solicitor Eric Jakes did.
In
Out
37:22
It wasn't until they started getting whatever the amount of the fine is that the commissioner's office was sending to their corporate office that they realized between the motion and that they needed to actually call the ward councilor that has had the most complaints in the area.
In
Out
37:41
The driver basically said, what do you want me to do for 45 minutes while I'm doing other— picking up dumps?
In
Out
37:48
And I said, well, if you get to the house before 7 o'clock in the morning, we're going to continue to fine you.
In
Out
37:52
The lady has spoken to the driver.
In
Out
37:55
This was over a week ago.
In
Out
37:56
We had our first Monday, Danny.
In
Out
37:58
We had nothing.
In
Out
38:00
We had nothing.
In
Out
38:00
This was the first Monday because it was picked up on Monday mornings between 5:45 and 6:15 in the morning.
In
Out
38:07
This is the first Monday that we've had no issues.
In
Out
38:10
I would like to leave this item on the table in case the occurrence happens again.
In
Out
38:19
We've worked with the facility that has the dumpster.
In
Out
38:25
Part of the problem was there was cars parking that made it difficult for the driver to get there when employees were there.
In
Out
38:34
So at least with Republic Waste is they have worked with the company that owns the property to make sure that on Monday mornings there will be a clear path to the dumpster to allow for the pickup.
In
Out
38:51
I now have the regional representative's number as well as the lady that handles the local area, the drivers.
In
Out
38:58
So first Monday, we've had no issues, but I would like to leave the item tabled.
In
Out
39:04
Yes, um, if nobody minds from the chair, I would like to see this stay on the table too because Waste Management is notorious for this.
In
Out
39:13
And still is.
In
Out
39:15
Commissioners find them numerous times.
In
Out
39:16
I don't know how many times they call them, takes pictures when I go to work in the morning and leave the house at 6:30 and they're there.
In
Out
39:21
Neighbors complaining all the time and they're still continuing to do so.
In
Out
39:24
So, um, yes, let's leave it on the table, but I would like to at some point get these representatives in here and talk to them directly so that way they know that we're not going to tolerate this anymore because it is disturbing the neighborhoods.
In
Out
39:37
Okay.
In
Out
39:38
So can I get a motion to table?
In
Out
39:40
Motion to table made by Councilor Roy, seconded by Councilor Lopes.
In
Out
39:43
All in favor say aye.
In
Out
39:44
Opposed?
In
Out
39:45
The ayes have it.
In
Out
39:46
Seeing no further business before us, motion to adjourn made by Councilor Roy, seconded by Councilor Pemberton.
In
Out
39:53
All in favor say aye.
In
Out
39:54
Opposed?
In
Out
39:55
The ayes have it.
In
Out
39:56
Thank you for being— we are adjourned at 7:40 PM.
In
Out