City of New Bedford Meetings
Search and subscribe to city meeting topics that impact you
Newsletters
Subscribe
← Back to video
City Council — August 20, 2026
−
Fit
+
IN
0:00
OUT
0:00
Length
0:00
▶ Play selection
Export clip
Keyboard:
I
set in,
O
set out,
←
/
→
nudge playhead 5s.
2:23
All right, colleagues, we're good?
In
Out
2:29
Good, Sue?
In
Out
2:34
Good evening, ladies and gentlemen.
In
Out
2:37
Today is Thursday, August 20th, 2026, at 7:02 PM, and I am calling together this meeting of the New Bedford City Council in the City Council Chambers.
In
Out
2:49
Tonight we'll be led in prayer by Reverend Leona Fisher of In the Name of Jesus Church.
In
Out
3:01
Good evening, everyone.
In
Out
3:03
You know, they really wanted me to do a church service.
In
Out
3:06
Is everybody ready?
In
Out
3:08
They really wanted me to do a church service.
In
Out
3:10
Everyone ready?
In
Out
3:11
No, sir.
In
Out
3:11
I'm kidding.
In
Out
3:12
Good evening.
In
Out
3:13
Thanks for the invitation.
In
Out
3:15
I greet you in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.
In
Out
3:22
Father God, we take this pause between the busy day that is now behind us and the busy evening that is still before us, to acknowledge you and to invite your presence.
In
Out
3:39
I pray you provide each council member rejuvenation of body, mind, and spirit in order to process and resolve the agenda items set before them.
In
Out
3:55
May their labors and commitment result in positive change and growth for the city and the citizens of New Bedford.
In
Out
4:08
Father, I pray you empower them with courage and patience to hold fast to what is right.
In
Out
4:19
And at the end of the day, God, Bless them with peaceful rest, knowing that they did what is right.
In
Out
4:31
I pray you keep your hand of grace and mercy upon our city, our nation, and all nations of the world.
In
Out
4:41
This I pray in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.
In
Out
4:49
Amen.
In
Out
4:50
Thank you, Reverend.
In
Out
4:52
We'll be led tonight in the Pledge of Allegiance by Councilor of Ward 3, Sean Oliver.
In
Out
4:57
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
In
Out
5:14
Thank you, Mr. President.
In
Out
5:17
Thank you, Councilor.
In
Out
5:20
Tonight I am joined in the City Council chambers by my colleagues, Councilor at Large Ian Abreu, Councilor of Ward 2 Scott Pemberton, Councilor of Ward 1 Leo Choquette, Councilor of Ward 5 Joseph Lopes, Councilor at Large Brian Gomes, Councilor at Large James Roy, Councilor at Large Naomi Carney, Councilor of Ward 3 Sean Oliver, Councilor at Large and Vice President Shane Burgow, Councilor of Ward 4 Derek Baptiste, and I'm Councilor of Ward 6 Ryan Pereira.
In
Out
5:50
I'd like to note this meeting is being live streamed and recorded.
In
Out
5:54
City Council and committee meetings can be viewed on the City of New Bedford's homepage under Quick Links, then Meetings.
In
Out
6:00
I'll ask the clerk if there are any letters to be read into the record at this time.
In
Out
6:04
Mr. President, there are none.
In
Out
6:05
Okay, thank you.
In
Out
6:07
This time I'll ask the clerk to read item number 1.
In
Out
6:10
Mr. President, item 1 is a resolution from City Council President Pereira commemorating the 250th anniversary of the founding of the United States of America.
In
Out
6:22
Second.
In
Out
6:23
And adopt.
In
Out
6:24
Motion and adopt.
In
Out
6:26
Made by Councilor Abrams, seconded by Councilor Burgo.
In
Out
6:29
At this time, um, should we All those in favor of adoption say aye.
In
Out
6:34
Roll call.
In
Out
6:35
Roll call vote has been requested.
In
Out
6:40
Councillor Abreu.
In
Out
6:41
Yes.
In
Out
6:41
Councillor Baptiste.
In
Out
6:43
Yes.
In
Out
6:43
Councillor Burgos.
In
Out
6:44
Yes.
In
Out
6:45
Councillor Carney.
In
Out
6:46
Yes.
In
Out
6:47
Councillor Chauquet.
In
Out
6:47
Yes.
In
Out
6:49
Councillor Gomes.
In
Out
6:50
Yes.
In
Out
6:50
Councillor Lopes.
In
Out
6:51
Yes.
In
Out
6:52
Councillor Oliver.
In
Out
6:53
Yes.
In
Out
6:54
Councillor Pemberton.
In
Out
6:55
Yes.
In
Out
6:56
Councillor Pereira.
In
Out
6:56
Yes.
In
Out
6:57
Councillor Roy.
In
Out
6:58
Yes, yes, passes 11 to 0, Mr. President.
In
Out
7:01
Item passes 11 to 0.
In
Out
7:03
The resolution has been adopted, and I will ask the clerk to read the resolution.
In
Out
7:06
Accompanied with the resolution is a replica of the Declaration of Independence that was given to the city of New Bedford and the residents of New Bedford through the state delegation representatives Antonio Cabral, Chris Hendricks, Senator Mark— Senator Tigney.
In
Out
7:26
Jeez, what a brain fart.
In
Out
7:27
Sorry.
In
Out
7:28
And the entire delegation.
In
Out
7:29
So I'll ask the clerk to read the resolution.
In
Out
7:32
Mr. President, the resolution reads as follows: A resolution commemorating the 250th anniversary of the founding of the United States of America.
In
Out
7:39
Whereas July 4th, 2026 marked the 250th anniversary, semi-quincentennial, of the adoption of the Declaration of Independence by the Second Continental Congress in Philadelphia in 1776, signifying the founding of the United States of America; and whereas the Declaration of Independence proclaimed timeless principles of profound significance to the national heritage of the United States, including that all are created equal and endowed with certain inalienable rights, including life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; and that governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed; and whereas the founding of the United States established the principle of federalism, emphasizing a decentralized system of government wherein powers are divided between national and state governments, fostering liberty, accountability, and responsiveness to local communities; and whereas this decentralized governance model has allowed for innovation, diverse policy approaches, and stronger accountability to the citizens of each state, ensuring that government remains close to and reflective of the people's will; and whereas the founding of the United States initiated a journey toward forming a more perfect union marked by historic achievements, struggles, and progress in realizing the nation's founding ideals for all citizens; and whereas the State of Massachusetts has played a significant role throughout the history of the United States, contributing to the nation's development, culture, economy, and defense through the efforts and sacrifices of its citizens; and whereas the Semi-Quincentennial offers a unique opportunity for the people of Massachusetts to reflect on our shared history, honor the diverse contributions of all Americans, celebrate our heritage of liberty, and look forward to the future we strive to create for subsequent generations.
In
Out
9:25
And now, therefore, be it resolved that the New Bedford City Council hereby recognizes and commemorates the 250th anniversary of the founding of the United States of America, celebrated on July 4th, 2026, and formally accepts this replica of the Declaration of Independence presented by State Representative Antonio F.D.
In
Out
9:44
Cabral to the New Bedford City Council at a City Council meeting held on August 20th, 2026.
In
Out
9:52
Be it further resolved that the New Bedford City Council encourages all residents, visitors, educational institutions, civic organizations, businesses, and surrounding communities to take the opportunity to view this remarkable piece of American history.
In
Out
10:05
Be it further resolved that this replica of the Declaration of Independence shall be available for public viewing through December 31st, 2026.
In
Out
10:13
Thereafter, it shall be permanently displayed in the New Bedford City Council Chambers as a lasting tribute to the principles of liberty, democracy, and the nation's founding for generations to come.
In
Out
10:25
Thank you.
In
Out
10:29
All right, moving on to mayor's papers.
In
Out
10:32
I will ask the clerk to read item M1, please.
In
Out
10:34
Mr. President, M1 is communication from the mayor to the council submitting a veto of the ordinance amending Chapter 19 of the city code relative to paid family leave.
In
Out
10:43
This veto was received in the city council office on July 10th, and the order was spread on the record on July 16th.
In
Out
10:50
M1A is the ordinance.
In
Out
10:52
Move to approve notwithstanding the objections of the mayor.
In
Out
10:55
Second.
In
Out
10:56
Motion to approve notwithstanding the objections of the mayor made by Councilor Burgos.
In
Out
11:00
Second.
In
Out
11:00
Waiving Rule 40.
In
Out
11:01
And waive Rule 40, made by Councilor Burgos, seconded by Councilor Roy.
In
Out
11:05
On the question, the chair recognizes Councilor Burgos.
In
Out
11:11
Thank you, Mr. President.
In
Out
11:12
After nearly 3 years of work, this veto is a bad faith attempt to kill legislation that was developed carefully and in good faith.
In
Out
11:22
This conversation started in August of 2023 when a city employee came to me with a very real problem.
In
Out
11:29
Problem.
In
Out
11:30
Since then, we have worked through this issue in committee, considered the financial implications, and developed a reasonable policy to allow city employees to care for their families without exhausting the vacation and sick time they have earned.
In
Out
11:45
And now, after all that work, we're being told this is the product of special interests, that it's legally defective, and that it will somehow burden the tax These are all foolish claims.
In
Out
12:00
First, let's address the special interests.
In
Out
12:03
The employees this ordinance helps are not represented by a bargaining unit.
In
Out
12:08
They are Unit C employees.
In
Out
12:11
They don't have a union negotiating these benefits for them.
In
Out
12:15
They have us.
In
Out
12:16
That's why we are here, to fill a gap in our city's employee benefits.
In
Out
12:21
And I have to say, it seems this administration has a problem when someone other than the mayor identifies a problem, develops a solution, and actually gets something done.
In
Out
12:31
A good idea doesn't become a bad idea simply because it didn't come from the corner office.
In
Out
12:37
Second, these alleged legal defects.
In
Out
12:43
This ordinance does not take away a single right protected under state or federal law.
In
Out
12:48
It does not prevent anyone from taking FMLA.
In
Out
12:52
Or other legally protected leave.
In
Out
12:54
It simply determines when the city will continue paying an eligible employee while they are out on that leave.
In
Out
13:02
Unpaid protected leave and paid municipal leave are not the same thing.
In
Out
13:08
So if the administration is claiming that this ordinance violates state or federal law, then show us the law, show us the legal opinion, show us the specific provision we supposedly violated.
In
Out
13:20
Because after 3 years of discussion, those concerns should have been raised before we passed this ordinance, not suddenly appear in a veto message.
In
Out
13:28
Lastly, he talks about the budget.
In
Out
13:31
We were told this would have a budgetary impact, but during our work on this ordinance, the city's own CFO explained that this does not create a new operating budget line item.
In
Out
13:42
We are not creating positions or a new department or adding millions of dollars to the budget.
In
Out
13:48
These employees already have salaries appropriated in the city's operating budget.
In
Out
13:53
This ordinance simply allows an eligible employee to receive paid leave using the salary already budgeted for that position.
In
Out
14:03
And yes, there are operational considerations when an employee is absent, but that happens every day.
In
Out
14:10
Employees take vacation, they call out sick, they take unpaid leave, they retire, they transfer, or they get laid off like we've seen in this past budget.
In
Out
14:22
Our departments already manage those situations.
In
Out
14:25
Coworkers step up, supervisors adjust, and departments adapt.
In
Out
14:30
So let's not pretend this ordinance creates some unprecedented operational burden.
In
Out
14:35
What it does create is an opportunity for an employee to welcome a child into their family without having to choose between being there for that moment and preserving the vacation and sick time they've earned.
In
Out
14:46
For years, this administration has talked about recruitment and retention.
In
Out
14:51
Well, if they want to compete for good employees, we need competitive benefits.
In
Out
14:57
Supporting employees when they welcome a child into their family is a basic part part of being a modern employer.
In
Out
15:03
This ordinance is about our employees.
In
Out
15:06
It's about a mother who should not have to burn through her vacation time to recover from childbirth and care for her newborn.
In
Out
15:13
It's about a father who should be able to be home to support his partner and bond with his child.
In
Out
15:18
It's about an employee welcoming a child through adoption and knowing that their employer recognizes that their family matters.
In
Out
15:27
And it's about telling our employees that they should not have to choose between being there for their families and protecting the leave they've earned.
In
Out
15:35
Tonight, despite the administration's attempt to stop it, we have an opportunity to finally deliver it.
In
Out
15:42
And I am proud to stand on the side of our employees, on the side of working families.
In
Out
15:47
And after nearly 3 years of work, I'm proud that this council is standing up for them too.
In
Out
15:54
Thank you, Mr. President.
In
Out
15:56
Thank you.
In
Out
16:01
Ladies and gentlemen, I just ask that during debate, no applause during debate, please and thank you.
In
Out
16:06
Anyone else on the question?
In
Out
16:10
Okay.
In
Out
16:10
This time I'll ask the clerk to call the roll on the motion to override the veto and waive Rule 4.
In
Out
16:17
Councillor Abreu.
In
Out
16:18
Yes.
In
Out
16:18
Councilor Baptiste?
In
Out
16:19
Yes.
In
Out
16:19
Yes.
In
Out
16:20
Councilor Burgos?
In
Out
16:21
Yes.
In
Out
16:21
Yes.
In
Out
16:22
Councilor Carney?
In
Out
16:22
Yes.
In
Out
16:23
Yes.
In
Out
16:23
Councilor Choquette?
In
Out
16:24
Yes.
In
Out
16:25
Yes.
In
Out
16:25
Councilor Gomes?
In
Out
16:26
Yes.
In
Out
16:27
Yes.
In
Out
16:27
Councilor Lopes?
In
Out
16:28
Yes.
In
Out
16:28
Yes.
In
Out
16:29
Councilor Oliver?
In
Out
16:29
Yes.
In
Out
16:30
Yes.
In
Out
16:31
Councilor Pemberton?
In
Out
16:31
Yes.
In
Out
16:32
Yes.
In
Out
16:32
Councilor Pereira?
In
Out
16:33
Absolutely.
In
Out
16:34
Yes.
In
Out
16:34
Councilor Roy?
In
Out
16:35
Yes.
In
Out
16:35
Yes.
In
Out
16:36
Passes 11 to 0, Mr. President.
In
Out
16:38
Item, item passes 11 to 0 and has been ordained.
In
Out
16:42
We'll ask the clerk, uh, clerk to read item M2, please.
In
Out
16:46
Mr. President, M2 is communication from the mayor to the council submitting an order for the appropriation of $39 million— I'm sorry, $39,303.75 from the Housing Works grant through the Massachusetts Executive Office of Housing and Livable Communities and within the custody of the Department of Public Infrastructure to public way layout and taking damages for a future signalized intersection at the intersection of Hillman and Purchase Streets.
In
Out
17:11
For the purchase and Pleasant Street improvement project, M2A is the order.
In
Out
17:18
Motion to adopt the order made by Councilor Abreu, seconded by Councilor Choquette.
In
Out
17:21
Anyone on the question?
In
Out
17:23
I'll ask the clerk to call the roll.
In
Out
17:25
Councilor Abreu?
In
Out
17:26
Yes.
In
Out
17:27
Councilor Baptiste?
In
Out
17:28
Yes.
In
Out
17:28
Yes.
In
Out
17:29
Councilor Bergo?
In
Out
17:29
Yes.
In
Out
17:30
Yes.
In
Out
17:30
Councilor Carney?
In
Out
17:31
Yes.
In
Out
17:32
Yes.
In
Out
17:32
Councilor Choquette?
In
Out
17:33
Yes.
In
Out
17:34
Yes.
In
Out
17:34
Councilor Gomes?
In
Out
17:35
Yes.
In
Out
17:36
Yes.
In
Out
17:36
Councilor Lopes?
In
Out
17:37
Yes.
In
Out
17:38
Yes.
In
Out
17:38
Councilor Oliver?
In
Out
17:39
Yes.
In
Out
17:39
Excuse me.
In
Out
17:40
Yes.
In
Out
17:40
Councilor Pemberton?
In
Out
17:41
Yes.
In
Out
17:42
Yes.
In
Out
17:42
Councilor Pereira?
In
Out
17:43
Yes.
In
Out
17:44
Yes.
In
Out
17:44
Councilor Roy?
In
Out
17:45
Yes.
In
Out
17:46
Yes.
In
Out
17:48
Item passes 11 to 0.
In
Out
17:49
I will ask the clerk to read item M3.
In
Out
17:52
Mr. President, item M3 is communication from Mayor Mitchell to the City Council submitting an order for the proposed lease agreement between French Street Realty LLC and Comcast LLC and 3 Make a motion to receive and place on file and adopt the order as presented.
In
Out
18:06
Motion to adopt the order made by Councilor Lopes, seconded by Councilor Pemberton.
In
Out
18:11
Anyone on the question?
In
Out
18:13
All those in favor say aye.
In
Out
18:14
Aye.
In
Out
18:15
Opposed?
In
Out
18:15
The ayes have it.
In
Out
18:16
Without objection, the chair will take items M4 through M6 together.
In
Out
18:21
I'll ask the clerk to read.
In
Out
18:24
Mr. President, M4 is communication from the mayor to the council submitting a sewer abatement request for Tarquin Hill Realty Corporation at 627 Tarquin Hill Road, New Bedford, in the amount of $26,574.
In
Out
18:37
M5A is a sewer abatement request from the mayor for Tamara Ramsey at 161 Campbell Street, New Bedford, in the amount of $1,607.07.
In
Out
18:47
And M6 is a sewer abatement request for Chevaroya McElroy at 234 Austin Street, New Bedford, in the amount of $235.
In
Out
18:57
Motion to grant the abatement for M4, 5, and 6.
In
Out
19:01
Second.
In
Out
19:02
Motion to grant the abatements for 4, 5, and 6 made by Councilor Burgo, seconded by Councilor Baptiste.
In
Out
19:08
Anyone on the question?
In
Out
19:09
I'll ask the clerk to call the roll.
In
Out
19:11
Councilor Abram.
In
Out
19:13
Yes.
In
Out
19:13
Councilor Baptiste.
In
Out
19:14
Yes.
In
Out
19:15
Yes.
In
Out
19:15
Councilor Burgo.
In
Out
19:16
Yes.
In
Out
19:17
Councilor Carney.
In
Out
19:17
Yes.
In
Out
19:18
Yes.
In
Out
19:19
Councilor Choquette.
In
Out
19:20
Yes.
In
Out
19:20
Yes, Councilor Gomes.
In
Out
19:22
Yes, Councilor Lopes.
In
Out
19:24
Yes, Councilor Oliver.
In
Out
19:25
Yes, yes, Councilor Pemberton.
In
Out
19:27
Yes, yes, Councilor Pereira.
In
Out
19:28
Yes, yes, Councilor Roy.
In
Out
19:30
Yes, yes.
In
Out
19:31
Passes 11-0.
In
Out
19:33
Item passes 11-0.
In
Out
19:36
I will ask the clerk to read items M7 and M8 together without objection.
In
Out
19:43
Okay, Mr. President, M7 is communication from the the mayor to the council submitting the reappointment of Scott Grant of New Bedford to the Conservation Commission.
In
Out
19:51
This term will expire in June of 2029.
In
Out
19:54
And M8 is communication from the mayor to the council submitting the reappointment of Rebecca Lennart of New Bedford to the Conservation Commission.
In
Out
20:01
This term will also expire in June of 2029.
In
Out
20:03
Make a motion to receive M7 and M8, waive Rule 38 and waive Rule 40 with one vote, and grant— and grant the reappointment.
In
Out
20:11
Motion has been made to waive Rules 38 and 40 and grant the reappointments by Councilor Lopes, seconded by Councilor Burgos.
In
Out
20:17
Anyone on the question?
In
Out
20:19
I'll ask the clerk to call the roll.
In
Out
20:21
Councilor Abram.
In
Out
20:22
Yes.
In
Out
20:23
Councilor Baptiste.
In
Out
20:24
Yes.
In
Out
20:24
Councilor Burgos.
In
Out
20:25
Yes.
In
Out
20:26
Yes.
In
Out
20:26
Councilor Carney.
In
Out
20:27
Yes.
In
Out
20:27
Yes.
In
Out
20:28
Councilor Choquette.
In
Out
20:29
Yes.
In
Out
20:29
Yes.
In
Out
20:30
Councilor Gomes.
In
Out
20:31
Yes.
In
Out
20:32
Councilor Lopes.
In
Out
20:33
Yes.
In
Out
20:33
Yes.
In
Out
20:34
Councilor Oliver.
In
Out
20:34
Yes.
In
Out
20:35
Yes.
In
Out
20:35
Councilor Pemberton.
In
Out
20:36
Yes.
In
Out
20:37
Councilor Pereira.
In
Out
20:38
Yes.
In
Out
20:38
Yes.
In
Out
20:39
Councilor Roy.
In
Out
20:39
Yes.
In
Out
20:41
Yes, item passes 11 to 0.
In
Out
20:45
I will ask the clerk to— oh, sorry, are they here?
In
Out
20:48
I don't know.
In
Out
20:50
Is Scott or Rebecca here?
In
Out
20:55
Okay, perfect.
In
Out
20:57
I'll ask the clerk to read item M9.
In
Out
20:59
Mr. President, M9 is communication from the mayor to the council submitting the appointment of Brian J. Souza of New Bedford to the election commission.
In
Out
21:06
This term will expire in April of 2029.
In
Out
21:08
Motion to refer to the Committee on Appointments and Briefings.
In
Out
21:11
Second.
In
Out
21:12
Motion to refer to the Committee on Appointments and Briefings, made by Councilor Burgo, seconded by Councilor— everybody, uh, but seconded by Councilor Oliver.
In
Out
21:19
On the question, the chair recognizes Councilor Burgo.
In
Out
21:26
Um, I, I just wanted to address this, um, Communication from the mayor's office, which was sent now.
In
Out
21:37
The reason why that's significant is much like everything that comes from the mayor's office.
In
Out
21:42
It's very, very late.
In
Out
21:44
Although he's had this name for quite some time, and as always, he's asking the council to rush.
In
Out
21:51
I'm sure many people are aware, or I hope that everyone's aware.
In
Out
21:54
We have an election coming up on September first.
In
Out
21:58
And our city charter, for those who don't know, and I would hope that our mayor who's been here for over a decade should know our city charter, this council only has one meeting in July and one meeting in August.
In
Out
22:09
And he saw it fit to send this appointment to us at our one meeting in August, which is today, August 20th.
In
Out
22:18
It is customary for a new candidate to go to committee to be screened.
In
Out
22:22
We just did this with the last election commissioner that we had when there was a vacancy.
In
Out
22:26
That election commission, when it went vacant, was sent to us in a timely manner.
In
Out
22:31
It came before us.
In
Out
22:32
It went to committee.
In
Out
22:33
The chairwoman of the Committee on Appointments and Briefing put it at the next possible available meeting.
In
Out
22:41
There are no delays here on the council.
In
Out
22:42
We do our work.
In
Out
22:45
The problem here are the delays in the corner office, even with their full-time staff, the million-dollar— well, more than a million-dollar budget they have up there.
In
Out
22:54
They make mistake after mistake after mistake, and then they expect us to clean it up.
In
Out
22:58
So I just want to make it very clear for people, because we know the coroner office is going to point the finger and say, oh, look what— how terrible that council is that they didn't waive the screening and appoint Mr. Souza.
In
Out
23:09
And it's unfortunate.
In
Out
23:10
Mr. Souza is here tonight.
In
Out
23:12
I got to meet him.
In
Out
23:12
He's a very nice gentleman.
In
Out
23:15
And it's unfortunate he's here and he was expecting to be sworn in tonight, but that is not the way this works.
In
Out
23:20
He has to be screened.
In
Out
23:21
That is how we do this.
In
Out
23:22
That's how every other election commissioner has gotten on.
In
Out
23:25
And in some rare cases, maybe we waive the screening, but in this case, we're referring it to committee, how it should be done.
In
Out
23:32
And I don't want this administration to make it seem as though we have done something wrong when it was them.
In
Out
23:38
So I just want to be very clear here.
In
Out
23:40
This mayor has sat on this name for months and decided to wait till the last possible second, even though he knows the schedule of not only the election schedule but the council schedule.
In
Out
23:50
And we are following the procedure here.
In
Out
23:52
Thank you.
In
Out
23:53
Thank you.
In
Out
23:53
The chair recognizes Councilor Oliver.
In
Out
23:56
Thank you, Mr. President.
In
Out
23:57
I'll be brief because many of the same points that I was going to say were spoken by the councilor before me.
In
Out
24:05
Obviously, this is coming on the heels or coming on the eve of a state primary.
In
Out
24:12
And as the councilor who spoke before me stated, I hope a lot of people realize that there is a primary.
In
Out
24:17
I know, I know there is a state primary.
In
Out
24:21
But here's another example of us on the second floor cleaning up the inefficiency of the third floor.
In
Out
24:31
Or the lack of attention to detail.
In
Out
24:33
Now, the councilor from Purchase Street spoke that we— the mayor has been given the— this gentleman's name, or has sat on this name for months.
In
Out
24:44
And that's true, as many of us do.
In
Out
24:46
We sit in different capacities at different boards, commissions, and groups throughout the city.
In
Out
24:53
And I know for a fact, as the chair of the Republican City Committee, the Republican City has sent communication to the administration with 2 names for consideration for this vacancy on the Election Commission.
In
Out
25:08
That was on— in April, April 28th to be exact.
In
Out
25:11
I believe I— you were actually CC'd on that correspondence.
In
Out
25:15
I've actually provided that to the office so our councilors can all see that correspondence.
In
Out
25:23
But what it is, is this is something that should have been taken care of months ago, not a week and a half before the primary election.
In
Out
25:30
The process is a process for a reason.
In
Out
25:33
It's so that the applicant can come up here, speak, to introduce themselves in a lot of cases to people and the public for the very first time.
In
Out
25:43
So although I do recognize that this vacancy has to be filled, It should not be rushed through because these— this board is in charge of upholding the integrity and facilitating our elections here in the city of New Bedford.
In
Out
25:59
So I apologize that Mr. Sousa is here tonight, but it gave him at least the opportunity to introduce himself to a lot of people here.
In
Out
26:07
So although I will be supporting him, I hope my colleagues will do the same in the future date when this is properly before this council.
In
Out
26:14
So thank you.
In
Out
26:15
With that, I yield.
In
Out
26:16
Thank you.
In
Out
26:17
Anyone else on the question?
In
Out
26:20
Just briefly from the chair, if there's one committee, uh, colleagues, that deserves to have a proper screening, it is the committee— the commission— the Elections Commission to uphold integrity of elections in our city.
In
Out
26:31
There is one commission or board in this city that deserves a full screening.
In
Out
26:35
It is this one.
In
Out
26:36
It is too important.
In
Out
26:37
Thank you.
In
Out
26:39
Without seeing any other questions, all those in favor of referral to committee say aye.
In
Out
26:43
Opposed, the ayes have it.
In
Out
26:44
I will ask the clerk to read item M10.
In
Out
26:47
Mr. President, M10 is a communication from the mayor to the city council submitting the reappointment of Joseph Latimer of New Bedford as a constable.
In
Out
26:54
M10A is his application.
In
Out
26:58
Waiving Rule 38 and 40.
In
Out
27:01
Motion to waive Rules 38 and 40, made by— and grant the appointment, made by Councilor Abruzzo, seconded by Councilor Burgow.
In
Out
27:07
Anyone on the question?
In
Out
27:09
I'll ask the clerk to call the roll.
In
Out
27:11
Hebrew?
In
Out
27:13
Yes.
In
Out
27:13
Council Baptist?
In
Out
27:17
Yes.
In
Out
27:17
Yes.
In
Out
27:18
Council Burgo?
In
Out
27:19
Yes.
In
Out
27:20
Council Carney?
In
Out
27:20
Yes.
In
Out
27:21
Yes.
In
Out
27:22
Council Choquette?
In
Out
27:22
Yes.
In
Out
27:23
Yes.
In
Out
27:24
Council Gomes?
In
Out
27:25
Yes.
In
Out
27:25
Yes.
In
Out
27:25
Council Lopes?
In
Out
27:26
Yes.
In
Out
27:27
Yes.
In
Out
27:27
Council Oliver?
In
Out
27:28
Yes.
In
Out
27:29
Yes.
In
Out
27:29
Council Pemberton?
In
Out
27:30
Yes.
In
Out
27:31
Yes.
In
Out
27:31
Council Pereira?
In
Out
27:32
Yes.
In
Out
27:32
Yes.
In
Out
27:33
Councilor Roy?
In
Out
27:33
Yes.
In
Out
27:34
Yes.
In
Out
27:34
Passes 11 to 0, Mr. President.
In
Out
27:37
Item passes 11 to 0.
In
Out
27:41
Colleagues, without any objection at this time, I would like to take out of order items 14 through 17, have them all read together.
In
Out
27:57
Without objection.
In
Out
27:58
Without objection.
In
Out
27:59
At this time, I will have the clerk read items 14 through 17.
In
Out
28:05
Mr. President, item 14 is a written motion from Councilor Gomes requesting that the Committee on Public Safety and Neighborhoods immediately meet with Police Chief Jason Foti, a representative from the mayor's office, and a representative from Flock Safety.
In
Out
28:18
This meeting is to bring all parties together for the purpose of enhancing policies and ensuring procedures and strengthening community trust around the use of these cameras.
In
Out
28:27
The policy is ensuring that the policy is transparent, every search being logged, and additional safeguards in place not only to protect the civil rights of the citizens but for the police department as well.
In
Out
28:37
Item 15 is a written motion from Councillors Burgo, Lopes, and Abreu requesting that the Committee on Public Safety and Neighborhoods meet with the representatives of the New Bedford Police Department, the city solicitor, the Information Technology Department, and any other appropriate officials to discuss discuss the city's use of law enforcement surveillance technologies, including but not limited to automated license plate reader systems, flock safety cameras, public safety camera networks, and any other technologies capable of collecting or retaining data on the movement of vehicles or individuals.
In
Out
29:07
And further, that the committee review the city's policies governing the collection, retention, sharing, security, and deletion of data generated by such technologies.
In
Out
29:16
The circumstances under which such data may be accessed or shared with outside law enforcement agencies, the safeguards in place to protect residents' constitutional rights and privacy, and whether additional local policies or ordinances are warranted to promote transparency, accountability, and public confidence while preserving the legitimate public safety benefits these technologies provide.
In
Out
29:38
Item 16 is written motion from Councilors Burgo, Abreu, and Lopes requesting that the Committee on Ordinances consider whether the appropriate policy outcome is either the complete removal and abolition of automated license plate reader systems and other similarly invasive surveillance technologies within the City of New Bedford, or in the alternative, establishing municipal automated license plate reader privacy and transparency standards.
In
Out
30:02
Item 17, Mr. President, is a written motion from Councilor Choquette requesting that the city of New Bedford immediately cease the use of flock cameras citywide until such time permanent legislation can be enacted as to their use.
In
Out
30:16
Refer to Committee on Public Safety and Neighborhoods.
In
Out
30:18
Second.
In
Out
30:20
So, so for items 14 and 15?
In
Out
30:23
Correct.
In
Out
30:23
So Council will, will refer items 14 and 15 to Public Safety, 16 to Ordinance, and 17 receive and place on file.
In
Out
30:31
Is that okay?
In
Out
30:32
That's fine.
In
Out
30:32
Okay, made by Councilor Gomes.
In
Out
30:34
Seconded by Councillor Carney.
In
Out
30:35
Anyone on the question?
In
Out
30:38
Chair recognizes Councillor Lopes.
In
Out
30:43
Thank you, Council President.
In
Out
30:43
I will be extremely brief.
In
Out
30:46
We have all seen across the country and our own city that the proposed safeguards don't work.
In
Out
30:52
The only safeguard is the actual removal of the cameras to provide the safety to the neighborhoods that they so rightfully deserve.
In
Out
31:00
We have seen firsthand that when you put safeguards in place, people will look for ways around them.
In
Out
31:07
The entire company has had to do a complete 360 in the last 30 days in regards to faults that they realized they implemented.
In
Out
31:17
I commend the chief for trying to put safeguards in place, but we're trying to put safeguards in place after incidents have already happened, and we're seeing it within the own department that he is running.
In
Out
31:27
So the only safeguard and the only mechanism that we can actually justify is shutting them down and removing them.
In
Out
31:33
Thank you.
In
Out
31:33
Thank you, Councillor.
In
Out
31:45
Just in the gallery, if we could just refrain from applause while debate is ongoing, I'd appreciate that.
In
Out
31:49
Thank you.
In
Out
31:51
Chair recognizes Councillor Roy.
In
Out
31:54
Thank you, Mr. President.
In
Out
31:55
I rise to speak in favor of, of the ordinance going— the motions going to Public Safety, the motions going to Ordinance, and to receive the councilor from Ward 1's motion on file.
In
Out
32:07
Um, I want to speak to public— the public hearing in Public Safety and, um, the policy review we want to do there.
In
Out
32:15
We have a 3-hour public forum In a packed auditorium at Pulaski School with Chief Thody, a representative from Flock Safety, the ACLU of Massachusetts, and members of the community.
In
Out
32:30
More than 100 people attended, and roughly 2 dozen residents spoke, not to mention the folks outside today and the folks in this room.
In
Out
32:40
Their message was clear: people have serious concerns about privacy in New Bedford, the disproportionate impact that these technologies have on the BIPOC community, oversight, and any lack of a public process before these cameras were installed.
In
Out
32:59
After that forum, I continued to ask residents and workers I encountered throughout the city what they thought of Flock, and their concerns were reasonable based on the reports of misuse nationwide.
In
Out
33:13
The recent incident involving our own New Bedford police officer shows that our city is not immune to those same risks, and we cannot dismiss our residents' concerns as hypothetical when our own city is now confronting the very questions they raised.
In
Out
33:33
I support additional public hearings and a review of the city's policies.
In
Out
33:38
I trust that the Public Safety Committee will ensure that the community plays a meaningful role in both the discussion and the policy review.
In
Out
33:47
Now, the item that we're referring to ordinance, I also support.
In
Out
33:52
I support sending the matter to the Ordinance Committee, and I trust that that committee will use that process to listen to the community and develop comprehensive policies for New Bedford going forward.
In
Out
34:05
I think many of the safeguards that the chief outlined in his recent release are important and overdue: a clear standard for searches, documentation of every search, regular audits, restrictions on outside agency access, prohibited uses, data retention limits, and public transparency reporting.
In
Out
34:30
Reporting, excuse me.
In
Out
34:33
However, I am not convinced that Flock Safety is the right partner for New Bedford.
In
Out
34:44
Given the controversies surrounding the company and its nationwide data-sharing network, I still have serious questions about whether we can adequately protect residents' privacy, their civil rights, their civil liberties and their personal safety.
In
Out
34:59
But this issue is bigger than Flock, right?
In
Out
35:05
There are other types of cameras with facial recognition.
In
Out
35:08
There are cell site simulators, predictive policing systems, and future tech we don't know about.
In
Out
35:15
Our city has used surveillance technologies for years without sufficient transparency or accountability.
In
Out
35:24
While these tools may provide public safety benefits, their use has also caused harm.
In
Out
35:32
So I support sending this motion to Ordinance Committee because all surveillance technology currently used or considered for future use by the city should be subject to clear standards and public oversight, Mr. President.
In
Out
35:46
The public should know what surveillance technology is being used or exposed, how it's used and shared, and what safeguards are in place.
In
Out
35:55
Residents should have a meaningful opportunity to weigh in on its use and the rules governing it.
In
Out
36:02
Their elected representatives, us, should vote on whether its use is approved.
In
Out
36:11
And if it is approved, there must be ongoing transparency and accountability for how it's actually used.
In
Out
36:19
Mr. President, the basic premise is simple: surveillance technology must be governed by clear rules that protect our safety and our rights, and decisions about its use must be made in the open, with meaningful public participation and democratic oversight.
In
Out
36:39
Finally, I believe the chief should keep FLOC suspended while we review the city's policies, while we develop comprehensive legislation and determine if FLOC is appropriate for New Bedford at all.
In
Out
36:57
And with that, I yield, Mr. President.
In
Out
36:59
Thank you, Councilor.
In
Out
37:04
Chair recognizes Councilor Gomes.
In
Out
37:07
Thank you, Mr. President.
In
Out
37:11
Did we orchestrate this this evening, or was this just how we planned it?
In
Out
37:19
I have been a proponent for cameras in the city of New Bedford for a long time.
In
Out
37:23
I was one of the first.
In
Out
37:25
I've been here a while when, um, we had other police agencies who had cameras in their cruisers and we had none.
In
Out
37:31
We finally got them, but they broke them.
In
Out
37:34
They weren't working.
In
Out
37:37
I asked for police cameras on police officers.
In
Out
37:41
I asked for cameras within our neighborhoods to bring public safety to a place where we could get the criminal.
In
Out
37:53
The criminal could be seen.
In
Out
37:56
Flock has come along, and we wouldn't even have known about this.
In
Out
37:59
And let me say this.
In
Out
38:01
The first thing we did wrong in this city, and we didn't do it, the administration did it, was not tell the people of what this was all about.
In
Out
38:09
Not even some of us knew that these cameras were up throughout the city.
In
Out
38:14
They should have had a public announcement, said that the cameras were going up.
In
Out
38:19
We know the cameras are watching you everywhere.
In
Out
38:21
Cameras are watching you everywhere.
In
Out
38:23
When you go into the shopping store, when you go in the mall, when you go into neighborhoods.
In
Out
38:27
The first thing our police department is doing when a crime is committed within the city is going to residential houses to see if they have caught anything on their cameras that can possibly assist in the criminal action that has been taken and the arrests that should be made on that.
In
Out
38:46
I'm a proponent of the cameras, but what I'm not a proponent of is using the cameras in a way that is unconstitutional and against people's rights.
In
Out
38:55
And that's why this motion is here tonight.
In
Out
38:57
I'm basically asking that we go into public safety, we go through all of this, you give me a guarantee that these cameras will not be messed with in unjustified ways, and I'm okay with that.
In
Out
39:10
But as far as— No!
In
Out
39:13
Take them down!
In
Out
39:16
Excuse me.
In
Out
39:17
Excuse me, there'll be— please refrain yourselves in the gallery.
In
Out
39:20
I would hope that you would do that.
In
Out
39:22
You know, the same respect that we show you, show us.
In
Out
39:29
Mr. President, while we have a chamber of people here tonight, this is not the 100,000 people that we represent.
In
Out
39:40
You're a class act.
In
Out
39:42
I got half of a house that wouldn't even stand up for the Pledge of Allegiance tonight.
In
Out
39:46
Now they're not going to even let the representation speak.
In
Out
39:52
Motion to recess.
In
Out
39:54
Can we get a recess, please, Mr.
In
Out
39:56
Chair?
In
Out
39:59
Do what you have to do.
In
Out
40:02
Can we just— can we have a recess, please?
In
Out
40:06
No, you owe my wife, and you can talk to me this evening, this tonight, and I've given you the respect.
In
Out
40:11
What do you want me to do?
In
Out
40:12
You want me to sit down, Mr. President?
In
Out
40:13
One minute, please.
In
Out
40:14
Is that what you want me to do?
In
Out
40:15
Because this is out of hand as Pulaski was out of hand.
In
Out
40:19
I would just ask.
In
Out
40:21
I would just ask that the members of Parliament.
In
Out
40:24
A motion to recess has been made.
In
Out
40:26
We'll take a recess.
In
Out
40:27
Thank you.
In
Out
40:44
Yep, I know, I know.
In
Out
40:48
All right, we're calling together back this meeting on the City Council.
In
Out
40:52
I would like to ask members of the gallery, rule number 4 in the council chambers dictates proper decorum in the council.
In
Out
41:02
That is to refrain from outbursts, applause, commentary.
In
Out
41:06
What I would ask is that while you might disagree with members of my, my colleagues, members of the city council are saying, or you might agree with what they are saying, I ask that you maintain proper decorum so we can effectively get through the meeting.
In
Out
41:20
You will hear what everyone has to say on the matter.
In
Out
41:22
They will— this is being referred to committees.
In
Out
41:25
Proper decorum will be had.
In
Out
41:26
If we cannot get through that I will have to suspend these items so that we can have proper debate at an appropriate time.
In
Out
41:34
So I'm just asking that members refrain outbursts and comments from the gallery so that we may get through the debate of my colleagues.
In
Out
41:44
So if everyone is amenable to that, I appreciate it and can withhold from applause, clapping, or speaking.
In
Out
41:50
Thank you very much.
In
Out
41:52
And with that, I will recognize Councilor Gomes.
In
Out
41:57
Thank you again, Mr. President.
In
Out
41:59
Mr. President, my intentions were to fix the problem that has arisen here, to bring all parties together in public safety, to make sure that these flock cameras were not violating anybody's rights.
In
Out
42:12
They were protecting the people of the city of New Bedford, not violating anyone's rights.
In
Out
42:23
I'm really sorry tonight that this body, in the American way, could not— I could not stand up as a councilor and just say what I had to say without the retaliation that has happened here tonight.
In
Out
42:41
Councilor Gomes, take your seat, please.
In
Out
42:44
The city council Excuse me.
In
Out
42:47
I love this.
In
Out
42:49
Take a seat, please.
In
Out
42:51
At this time, at this time, we cannot appropriately and effectively handle these items.
In
Out
42:56
They will be tabled.
In
Out
42:58
These will be tabled, and we will, we will, if we can Cover every single camera.
In
Out
43:14
Cover them all.
In
Out
43:15
That's, that's, that's what you— yeah.
In
Out
43:24
Ladies and gentlemen, it is 7:53.
In
Out
43:27
The meeting has been suspended due to lack of decorum.
In
Out
43:30
Thank you.
In
Out
43:31
We are adjourned at 7:53 PM.
In
Out