City of New Bedford Meetings
Search and subscribe to city meeting topics that impact you
Newsletters
Subscribe
← Back to video
Ordinance Committee — July 14, 2026
−
Fit
+
IN
0:00
OUT
0:00
Length
0:00
▶ Play selection
Export clip
Keyboard:
I
set in,
O
set out,
←
/
→
nudge playhead 5s.
0:41
Good evening.
In
Out
0:41
It is 7:05 PM on July 14th, 2026.
In
Out
0:46
This is the Committee on Ordinances.
In
Out
0:49
Note this meeting is being live streamed and recorded.
In
Out
0:52
City Council and committee meetings can be viewed on the City of New Bedford's homepage under Quick Links, then Meetings.
In
Out
0:58
I'll ask the clerk if there is anything to be read into the record.
In
Out
1:00
I do.
In
Out
1:01
I have 4 letters to read into the record.
In
Out
1:02
This one is from Councilor Pereira— Council President Pereira.
In
Out
1:06
I am writing to inform you that I will not be able to attend Committee on Ordinances meeting on Tuesday, July 14th, 2026 at 7 PM due to a personal commitment.
In
Out
1:15
I ask that you read this letter into the record to make my colleagues and those in attendance and the public aware of the reason for my absence.
In
Out
1:21
So it's from Councillor Choquette.
In
Out
1:23
I am writing to inform you that I've been unable to attend the Committee on Ordinances meeting on Tuesday, July 14th, 2026 at 7 PM due to a work commitment.
In
Out
1:31
I ask that you read this letter into the record to make my colleagues and those in attendance and the public aware of the reason for my absence.
In
Out
1:39
The third letter is from Councillor Lopes.
In
Out
1:40
I'm writing this letter to inform you that I will be unable to attend the Committee on Ordinances meeting on Tuesday, July 14th 2026 at 7 PM due to a work commitment.
In
Out
1:49
I ask that you read this letter into the record to make my colleagues, those in attendance, and the public aware of the reason for my absence.
In
Out
1:56
And the last one is from Councilor Abram.
In
Out
1:58
I'm writing this letter to inform you that I'm unable to attend the Committee on Ordinances meeting on Tuesday, July 14th, 2026 at 7 PM due to a work commitment.
In
Out
2:06
I ask that you read this letter into the record to make my colleagues and those in attendance and the public aware of the reason For my absence.
In
Out
2:13
Motion to receive and place all 4 communications on file.
In
Out
2:16
Excuse me.
In
Out
2:17
Motion to receive and place on file made by Councilor Oliver, seconded by Councilor Pemberton.
In
Out
2:21
Anyone on the question?
In
Out
2:23
Seeing none, all those in favor say aye.
In
Out
2:26
Any opposed?
In
Out
2:26
The ayes have it.
In
Out
2:28
Without objection, I'd ask the clerk to read all of the items since they're all related.
In
Out
2:33
Without objection, we'll begin with the clerk reading all the items.
In
Out
2:37
Item number 1 is a communication, Mayor Mitchell to the City Council, submitting an ordinance amending Chapter 2, Section 2 -47, establishing of the Department of Health and Human Services.
In
Out
2:47
It was referred here on June 11th, 2026.
In
Out
2:50
1A is the ordinance referred here on the same day.
In
Out
2:53
2 is a communication, Mayor Mitchell to the City Council, submitting an ordinance amending Chapter 2, Administration, relative to Article IX, which is 9, Human Rights Commission, Article 10, uh, Council on Aging, Article 13, Commission for Citizens and Disabilities, Article 15— 16.
In
Out
3:13
I'm being tested with my Roman numerals here.
In
Out
3:16
Division of Community Services.
In
Out
3:18
Article 20, Department of Facilities and Fleet Management.
In
Out
3:23
And Article 21, Public Infrastructure Department.
In
Out
3:27
Uh, 2A is the ordinance which was referred here on the same day.
In
Out
3:31
3 is a communication, Mayor Mitchell to the City Council, submitting an ordinance amending Chapter 12, Health and Sanitation, Article 1 in General by adding Section 12-11, Oversight by the Department of Health and Human Services, to the Board of Health, referred here on June 11, 2026.
In
Out
3:47
3A is the ordinance, which was referred on the same day.
In
Out
3:50
4 is communication, Mayor Mitchell to the City Council, submitting an ordinance amending Chapter 15, License and Permits, Business Regulations, Article 1, in General, by adding Sections 15-15 and 15-16 relative to the Licensing Board.
In
Out
4:07
It was referred here on June 11, 2026.
In
Out
4:10
And the ordinance was referred on the same day.
In
Out
4:14
Number 5, it's communication Mayor Mitchell to the City Council submitting an ordinance amending Chapter 18, Sections 18-9 and 18-10 relative to Parks and Recreation, referred here on June 11th, 2026.
In
Out
4:28
5A is the ordinance which was referred on the same day.
In
Out
4:31
Number 6, communication Mayor Mitchell to the City Council submitting an ordinance amending Chapter 25, Sections 25-1 and 25- 4 and 25-10 relative to veterans referred here on June 11th, 2026.
In
Out
4:46
6A is the ordinance which was referred on the same day.
In
Out
4:49
So 1 through 6A are now before you.
In
Out
4:54
Motion to receive and place on file made by Councilor Oliver, seconded by Councilor Pemberton.
In
Out
5:01
All those— anyone on the question?
In
Out
5:03
All those in favor say aye.
In
Out
5:05
Aye.
In
Out
5:05
Any opposed?
In
Out
5:06
The ayes have it.
In
Out
5:07
Who would like to present on behalf of the administration or to begin on— all right, Director Sloan, the podium is yours.
In
Out
5:21
Good evening.
In
Out
5:22
Thank you for having me today.
In
Out
5:25
Like I presented for my FY27 budget hearing, The integration of a Health and Human Services Department is exciting to me as it creates a more coordinated, efficient, and resident-centered approach to serving the community.
In
Out
5:47
There are a lot of strategic advantages to putting this ordinance in place.
In
Out
5:53
We have a shared scope, so health licensing, veterans, recreation, and community services all impact the well-being of our community.
In
Out
6:01
By reducing barriers to health, addressing factors that impact quality of life, and/or enforcing the laws and regulations that protect the health and safety of our community.
In
Out
6:12
There's also an enhanced funding eligibility.
In
Out
6:15
So, HHS systems are often viewed as more competitive for funding opportunities because they demonstrate a capacity to implement comprehensive strategies as well as have a greater impact and reach different populations within the community.
In
Out
6:33
Also, improved community resilience.
In
Out
6:37
So by combining our resources, coordination, and access to the community, we can improve the city's ability to respond to emergencies and the shifting needs of the community.
In
Out
6:50
We also position ourselves as a regional leader.
In
Out
6:54
We're already doing some of this work with our grants, working regionally with other communities.
In
Out
7:01
But in the inevitable public health regionalization that will occur at some point down the line, I think that being a Health and Human Services model further strengthens our leadership in that space.
In
Out
7:18
Since the approval of the FY27 budget, we have been supporting the departments that fall under Health and Human Services.
In
Out
7:27
Some of that support has looked like supporting finance and operations with payroll budgets and the decentralized AP preparation.
In
Out
7:38
We've also provided leadership for those individuals who have lost managers or departments don't have department heads anymore.
In
Out
7:51
We've done some health translation, enhanced policies, have been thinking about all of the grants that we're applying for with an HHS lens, and have also jointly applied for a grant, a federal grant with recreation around substance prevention, substance misuse prevention.
In
Out
8:13
And I think that's, you know, that's really just the tip of the iceberg.
In
Out
8:18
In terms of future implementation, you know, Christine and I were talking about our processes for permitting and licensing.
In
Out
8:29
I think one thing that really clicked when we were having our conversation is that we can make it easier for businesses by aligning our timelines and the workflows for a restaurant getting their liquor license as well as their food permit on the same timeline, in the same workflow.
In
Out
8:52
Right now they're, you know, 6 months apart in different workflows.
In
Out
8:58
We also are looking at different opportunities.
In
Out
9:04
Recreation has access to a lot of youth.
In
Out
9:09
We have access to BSAS funding, which supports prevention efforts.
In
Out
9:15
So, bringing those two together to incorporate those, you know, substance misuse prevention messaging and principles into the recreation work that's happening.
In
Out
9:30
I think with community services, as well as with veterans, you know, we have a number of resources, trainings, that can support the communities that they work with, as well as our department has really worked hard over the last 3 years or so around our data collection, writing grant processes, as well as translation and communications to the community.
In
Out
10:01
So those are all things that we also hope to support the departments with.
In
Out
10:08
Happy to answer any questions.
In
Out
10:11
Any questions from the body?
In
Out
10:16
Chair recognizes Councilor Gomes on his first.
In
Out
10:18
Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
In
Out
10:22
I think my feelings on this ordinance has been heard loud and clear.
In
Out
10:27
I do not support it.
In
Out
10:29
I believe that we did this some time ago and it did not work.
In
Out
10:33
I understand what you're saying this evening and throwing in the grants that will be available and all that good stuff.
In
Out
10:40
But can you tell me, well, your opinion?
In
Out
10:44
I'm going to ask other department heads how they feel.
In
Out
10:47
But do you believe that this works under this umbrella?
In
Out
10:51
This can work?
In
Out
10:53
Because I don't believe veterans and licensing has anything to do with health.
In
Out
10:57
I don't think recreation has anything to do with health.
In
Out
11:00
Except for providing our young people through recreation or whatever the ability to exercise, have things to do or whatever.
In
Out
11:10
Can you answer that?
In
Out
11:12
Yeah, I, you know, I can't speak to what happened 15-odd years ago.
In
Out
11:19
My understanding of that was there were different philosophies on how city government should be set up.
In
Out
11:27
However, I think that there are a lot of synergies between departments.
In
Out
11:32
Can I hold you up a minute?
In
Out
11:34
You answered that with— there was different philosophical reasons why we— the administration at that time did that.
In
Out
11:43
Could you be a little more specific?
In
Out
11:45
Yeah.
In
Out
11:46
My understanding of why Health and Human Services had gotten broken up was because the mayor at the time had a different philosophy on how the city departments should be structured.
In
Out
12:02
It wasn't because it wasn't working.
In
Out
12:05
That is not my understanding.
In
Out
12:07
That is not your understanding.
In
Out
12:09
Okay.
In
Out
12:09
Continue.
In
Out
12:11
So to your, to your question about how the departments and health intersect, I think we you know, in my opening statement, we— all of the community, all of the departments are doing things for the well-being of the community.
In
Out
12:30
Veterans are supporting benefits for qualifying veterans.
In
Out
12:36
Community Services is providing, you know, face-to-face mediations.
In
Out
12:44
Behavioral health services for elders, programming for elders, that all contributes to an individual's quality of life, which contributes to their health.
In
Out
12:58
I think for licensing, you know, Christine is responsible for making sure that the businesses are following the regulations that are put in place.
In
Out
13:10
And those regulations are put in place for the health and safety of the community.
In
Out
13:15
So I think in each department, there is that link to health, whether it's, you know, traditional, like, connections to healthcare or the social determinants of health that affect— right?
In
Out
13:29
If you don't have housing, that affects your health.
In
Out
13:33
So, you know, they're either supporting the social determinants of health or health itself.
In
Out
13:42
Do you believe this will work?
In
Out
13:44
I do.
In
Out
13:45
We have, we have great people who work for the city, people who really care about what they do and the services they provide.
In
Out
13:56
Like I said at the budget hearing night, I'm not the expert in all of these spaces, and I'm never going to be, and I'm leaning into the expertise that exists.
In
Out
14:06
Because they understand their communities.
In
Out
14:09
I'm here to help them succeed, and I'm here to add to what they're doing.
In
Out
14:15
I'm not here to take away from what they're doing because they're already doing really great work.
In
Out
14:21
Do you believe that things will be out on time?
In
Out
14:25
There should be no delays on anything, correct?
In
Out
14:29
When it comes to licensing, would it I'm trying to get a picture of what this front counter looks like and the services I'm getting when I walk in the door.
In
Out
14:40
Or is it going to be the same old, you know, like going to one department in this place, we apply for something and then we're told to walk away, we come back, we've got to apply for something else or whatever.
In
Out
14:54
How do you see this working in that one shop, that one-stop And no delays?
In
Out
15:01
Yeah.
In
Out
15:01
So I think that a lot of, you know, a lot of work has been done to, you know, still provide services in person if people don't have a computer or, you know, need help filling out an application.
In
Out
15:19
But I think there's been a lot of work done to digitalize what's— what we're doing and make it easier for people to apply online for permits and licenses.
In
Out
15:31
I think that, like I mentioned, if we're able to think more about the workflows and the timelines of some of the permitting and licensing activities, it— we can have it all happen in the same, in the same workflow.
In
Out
15:48
So they don't have to come, you know, to the health department in in the new year to get their license for their alcohol permit or license renewed, and then 6 months later have to come back to get their food permit.
In
Out
16:04
So we're trying to think about those efficiencies to make it more seamless for individuals so that they don't get bounced around.
In
Out
16:10
One of the things that we are going to do, because the work that Christine in particular is doing is so similar to us, is that we are going to bring her into the health department so that we can work more closely on— and we have a free office available that we can bring her in and we can work more closely on some of those permit workflow issues.
In
Out
16:36
I'm not convinced, but we'll see.
In
Out
16:42
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
In
Out
16:45
Chair recognizes Councilor Carneiro first.
In
Out
16:47
Thank you, and thank you, Director, for coming this evening.
In
Out
16:50
I'm in— I guess, I guess we're old, old school and old-timers, but I'm not in agreement with the combining of these departments.
In
Out
17:00
But I just want to backtrack a little bit about your— you said about streamlining the food and the liquor.
In
Out
17:07
Doesn't that come under your department anyways?
In
Out
17:09
Nope.
In
Out
17:10
The alcohol liquor licensing is under licensing.
In
Out
17:15
The food permits are under the Health Department.
In
Out
17:18
Right.
In
Out
17:18
But if there's any controversies and stuff, do you get to see any of this?
In
Out
17:22
Just the food?
In
Out
17:23
Just the food.
In
Out
17:24
Just the food and the tobacco.
In
Out
17:26
Correct.
In
Out
17:26
We did.
In
Out
17:28
One of the things that we did implement just recently is we worked with the police department and licensing and the health department on alcohol compliance, much like we do with tobacco compliance.
In
Out
17:43
But ultimately, That falls under licensing and the licensing.
In
Out
17:47
Any of those issues go before the licensing board.
In
Out
17:50
Okay.
In
Out
17:50
So I mean, we still have a licensing board because I was noticing correct.
In
Out
17:55
Some of the oversight is going to go to the Board of Health.
In
Out
17:59
Nope.
In
Out
17:59
So the Health and Human Services will be will provide support to all of the boards, but the boards will exist.
In
Out
18:09
You know, they're going to Christine's still gonna.
In
Out
18:11
Help to facilitate the, the licensing board, you know, whatever support administratively she needs for that, we will help to provide.
In
Out
18:22
Okay, so what is, what is the Board of Health going to be taking on?
In
Out
18:28
Because we have the ordinance here, it's just Human Services that the Board of Health is going to be oversight.
In
Out
18:33
So that oversight, yep, that ordinance is so the Health and Human Services Division will be supporting like the administrative pieces of our Board of Health.
In
Out
18:44
So our Board of Health is still going to exist.
In
Out
18:46
The licensing board is still going to exist.
In
Out
18:48
The Veterans Advisory Board is still going to exist.
In
Out
18:51
The Parks Board Commission is still going to exist.
In
Out
18:53
And it'll just be under the umbrella of Health and Human Services.
In
Out
18:56
We'll provide the administrative support where it's needed.
In
Out
18:59
Right now, I'm just looking at the ordinances.
In
Out
19:02
It said oversight by the Department of Health and Human Services to the Board of Health.
In
Out
19:08
So I was just wondering where the breakdown was, because I know we have veteran advisory that we're— I'm sure we're keeping, license boards keeping, but we're combining all this stuff underneath your department.
In
Out
19:20
So I'm just curious, where does the— where does it start?
In
Out
19:23
Where does it end with the Board of Health?
In
Out
19:25
Yep.
In
Out
19:25
So Health and Human Services, like the Board of Health, will be under Health and Human Services, right?
In
Out
19:32
And your department, Health and Human Services, taken on all this other stuff with parks and this and that.
In
Out
19:38
So that's what I'm saying.
In
Out
19:39
It's— we still got a park board, we still have all these boards and commissions that are sitting out there that will not be underneath the Board of Health.
In
Out
19:49
They'll be this separate— they'll be this separate— correct.
In
Out
19:51
They're— all of the boards and commissions aren't going to fall under the Board of Health.
In
Out
19:55
They're going to fall under the umbrella of Health and Human Services.
In
Out
19:59
Right, but not under the Board of Health.
In
Out
20:01
We have 3 members on the board.
In
Out
20:03
Correct, correct.
In
Out
20:04
They will not be overseeing the veterans.
In
Out
20:06
They will not be overseeing licensing.
In
Out
20:08
Correct.
In
Out
20:09
They will not be overseeing the other departments, the individual boards that we have now.
In
Out
20:15
Correct.
In
Out
20:15
But I'm seeing the way this— the oversight, it just says the Health and Human Services Department, and all these people falling under the department.
In
Out
20:23
So I'm like, where does that break?
In
Out
20:25
Yeah, so the health and maybe it's kind of confusing.
In
Out
20:28
Yeah, Eric might be able to speak to it a little bit more.
In
Out
20:30
But the Board of Health duties will remain the Board of Health duties.
In
Out
20:34
They're not going to take on licensing or veterans or anything like that.
In
Out
20:38
Okay.
In
Out
20:39
That was just a little confusion in there.
In
Out
20:41
But I'm sorry, but I don't support the combination of these.
In
Out
20:45
But thank you so much.
In
Out
20:46
No problem.
In
Out
20:49
Anyone else from the floor?
In
Out
20:51
Chair recognizes Councilor Roy on his first.
In
Out
20:53
Thank you, Mr.
In
Out
20:54
Chair.
In
Out
20:56
Hi.
In
Out
20:56
Hi, how are you?
In
Out
20:57
Good, how are you?
In
Out
20:58
Good, it's nice to see you.
In
Out
20:59
I just have a question, just one question, and I don't know if you know the answer, but this reorg was done to save the city money in the coming year.
In
Out
21:09
And can you remind us, um, how much this is— this whole reorganization, um, is projected Yeah, so the programs that got cut and the positions and the not filling of the vacancies came in at $1 million, and then the COLAs and the corresponding COLAs and step freezes and before coming to City Council, budget reductions, um, and 5% vacancies was another $200,000.
In
Out
21:52
So what's the total there?
In
Out
21:54
$1.2 million.
In
Out
21:55
$1.2 million.
In
Out
21:55
Okay, thank you.
In
Out
21:56
Thank you, Mr.
In
Out
21:56
Chair.
In
Out
21:59
Anyone else?
In
Out
22:03
Sorry, Chair, we're gonna ask Councilor Gomes on a second.
In
Out
22:07
Um, In your work currently in action, it says providing leadership for employees without directors and managers.
In
Out
22:14
Exactly what does that mean?
In
Out
22:15
How the heck does somebody direct the licensing board, which you never dealt with, or recreation?
In
Out
22:23
Who becomes the chief person under this umbrella?
In
Out
22:28
Sure.
In
Out
22:28
So what we meant by that is particularly in those departments where the, you know, Mary retired and there's no director of Parks, Recs and Beaches anymore.
In
Out
22:46
And there's no director of Community Services anymore.
In
Out
22:50
And so the people who reported directly up to Cynthia or people who lost their jobs now need people to report up to.
In
Out
23:01
So You know, my team has stepped up to help support those staff so that staff feel supported.
In
Out
23:10
They know, you know, how to navigate this transition, how to get whatever needs fulfilled that they have or any concerns.
In
Out
23:21
And then in terms of, you know, veterans like Chris and Christine, I'm available to support them in any way that they need, as well as— So under this, this plan, they stay as the director of veterans?
In
Out
23:41
Correct.
In
Out
23:42
Christine stays doing licensing.
In
Out
23:45
I just— I'm trying to figure out, who do I— who do these people go to?
In
Out
23:50
So someone like Christine or Chris would come to me if they needed support support in the work that they were doing.
In
Out
23:56
When you say support, what kind of support can be provided that their department was given that they're the professionals in, as far as I'm concerned?
In
Out
24:06
What kind of support can be given to them?
In
Out
24:09
Sure.
In
Out
24:09
So something that I've worked a lot with our department on is bringing additional funding into the city.
In
Out
24:19
So we're always looking for opportunities to apply for grants.
In
Out
24:24
And, you know, now that— now I'm looking at everything with an HHS lens, right?
In
Out
24:31
How could this intersect with what we're doing with the COA?
In
Out
24:37
How could this intersect with what we're— you know, what Veterans is already doing?
In
Out
24:42
You know, not trying to add more work to anyone, but trying to think creatively about how we bring more funding into the city.
In
Out
24:49
Can I stop you right there?
In
Out
24:50
You say bringing more funding to the city.
In
Out
24:51
You would bring more funding to the health department.
In
Out
24:53
Because the health department had those grants that you could go after.
In
Out
24:57
What does this do when you go after— when the veterans go after a grant and they receive the grant, is that money going to stay with the veterans or is that money going to be spread throughout the department or whatever?
In
Out
25:09
May sound like a crazy question, but I'm asking.
In
Out
25:12
No, it's a good question.
In
Out
25:13
It would depend on how we applied for the funding.
In
Out
25:18
So just recently, like I mentioned, we applied for some SAMHSA funding, some federal funding.
In
Out
25:25
Working jointly with recreation.
In
Out
25:28
And so we've allocated some of that funding to go towards programming that would support the work that recreation is doing.
In
Out
25:37
We allocated some of that funding to the health department for some of the work that we're doing around mental health first aid training.
In
Out
25:45
So it depends how— it depends how the grant is written.
In
Out
25:49
But if, you know, if I'm— we're thinking about writing a grant for veterans, it would depend on— there might be an instance where the health department doesn't really have a role, and so all of it would be going to veterans.
In
Out
26:03
Or maybe we're thinking about, you know, the health department has a certain training, like we do CPR certifications.
In
Out
26:12
Maybe it's that the health department is providing a service for veterans, and Chris is helping us connect to veterans.
In
Out
26:19
So it depends on how we're thinking about the application, what the requirements of the grant are.
In
Out
26:25
But just the nature of getting a grant doesn't mean that the health department would keep it.
In
Out
26:30
It depends on how— I realize that.
In
Out
26:33
But you're talking about under this umbrella, it increases the opportunity to receive granting.
In
Out
26:39
You said that, not me.
In
Out
26:41
Yep.
In
Out
26:41
And, and I'm just trying to figure out if any department gets hurt through this.
In
Out
26:47
Does your department— will your department still, as the health department, still go after the grants that are needed for the health department separately, not under this umbrella?
In
Out
26:59
Yeah, we're always— we are always looking for additional funding to bring in.
In
Out
27:04
I think— will you still be applying for the grants that you receive on a yearly basis, every 2 years or whatever?
In
Out
27:14
Will you still be applying for those grants and will they still be going to the health department?
In
Out
27:19
Well, again, is it this umbrella?
In
Out
27:21
Because everything is under this umbrella.
In
Out
27:24
Does that affect you in any way?
In
Out
27:27
So we would still— we would still apply, like, for— do you mean like for, like, for instance, the tobacco compliance grant that we get?
In
Out
27:37
We'll still apply for the tobacco compliance funding when it comes up again so that we maintain that service for the community.
In
Out
27:45
Will still apply for the funding that we have.
In
Out
27:48
But in the new iterations of those grants, we'll be thinking about— we'll be thinking about it more broadly.
In
Out
27:56
Previously, we had just been thinking about it under the purview of the Health Department.
In
Out
28:00
But now we'll be thinking about it with the purview of HHS.
In
Out
28:04
Is there an opportunity to expand what we're doing or provide it to a different population within the community.
In
Out
28:14
2 more questions.
In
Out
28:15
Was there any discussion if this doesn't work what we're going to do?
In
Out
28:20
I don't think like that, huh?
In
Out
28:21
I, I am going to make it work.
In
Out
28:26
The last question is, are you— how long was this worked on before putting this before us?
In
Out
28:34
How long did you know about this?
In
Out
28:36
You seem to be the lead liaison of this whole thing.
In
Out
28:40
How long were you working on this before even the budget was presented to us?
In
Out
28:46
Um, I found out about it— I don't know the exact date, but it was, uh, probably the 3rd week in April.
In
Out
28:55
The 3rd week in April?
In
Out
28:56
Yep.
In
Out
28:57
Thank you very much.
In
Out
28:59
Uh, will we be able to ask the departments, uh, a question?
In
Out
29:03
Certainly, Mr. Chairman.
In
Out
29:04
Yes.
In
Out
29:04
I'm going to leave Steph alone.
In
Out
29:06
There may be other colleagues that have questions for her.
In
Out
29:09
Anyone else for Director Sloan?
In
Out
29:14
No, I think she just needed paperwork.
In
Out
29:17
If no objections from the chair, I just wanted to expand a bit from the questions my colleague— I don't know which street you live on.
In
Out
29:30
Hussey Street.
In
Out
29:31
Thank you.
In
Out
29:33
When he asked a very relevant question about the savings, that $1,180,535 that we're saving, that's been rounded up to $1.2 million.
In
Out
29:46
I just want to put the specific number on the record.
In
Out
29:49
That's largely from the 13 individuals that were laid off.
In
Out
29:53
Is that correct?
In
Out
29:55
Yes.
In
Out
29:55
And then some programming got cut.
In
Out
29:58
Yeah, programming, because I know like the Girl Design Academy, which the city would receive $75,000 from, for example, from the state, we lost that funding.
In
Out
30:07
So that funding, um, the earmark from Hendricks is going to the school department to continue the— but you lost that funding for your department.
In
Out
30:16
It is not within our department, correct?
In
Out
30:18
Thank you.
In
Out
30:19
So to piggyback on Clara Street, my colleague from Clara Street, I think the question that I also wanted to ask that I don't know if I really got an answer for is, in your opening remarks, you talked about having this structure would— I wrote here, an HHS system— HHS systems have access to better grants is what my understanding of this presentation was.
In
Out
30:42
But from my understanding, it's not necessarily that you have access to better grants, you just have a better opportunity to write to these grants.
In
Out
30:52
Is that correct?
In
Out
30:54
So we're seeing a real movement in grant applications.
In
Out
31:02
The larger reach that you have, the more competitive and the more impact you can show, the more competitive your grant is.
In
Out
31:09
So in some, in some grant applications, that looks like working with other community, working with other health departments.
In
Out
31:17
In some grant applications, that looks like working with community partners.
In
Out
31:23
So being able to say, you know, we're going to do this training program, it's going to be communicated to veterans, to our Council on Aging, our community services, it shows that we can have a larger reach and potential impact in our community.
In
Out
31:47
And what's stopping you from doing that now under the current structure?
In
Out
31:51
So collaborating with interdepartmental structures that we have now?
In
Out
31:56
Yep.
In
Out
31:56
So I think, you know, admittedly, I think we could be doing a better job of that in general as the health department.
In
Out
32:11
But we have worked with other departments.
In
Out
32:13
I think now right?
In
Out
32:16
We're just coming— like, we're coming at everything from sort of this HHS lens.
In
Out
32:22
And anytime, you know, we should always be looking for those opportunities, but even in those opportunities, you still have to— there's still another manager that you have to connect with.
In
Out
32:38
You might also have to put an MOU in place.
In
Out
32:40
You might also, you you know, the priorities of each of those departments, although, right, we're trying to provide good service to the community and benefit the community, the visions might be slightly different.
In
Out
32:55
So I think there's an opportunity for us to align those visions.
In
Out
33:01
And it's just, you know, being part of one team as HHS and thinking about grants with sort of that lens moving forward just provides a lot of opportunity.
In
Out
33:18
Okay.
In
Out
33:20
Yeah.
In
Out
33:20
So basically what I heard was that you can still apply for these grants as the Health Department and as Veterans Affairs, as we don't need to make any of these changes to go through the cost of making new letterhead.
In
Out
33:35
Because I would love to know what the cost of that would be.
In
Out
33:38
Because I assume all of the letterhead that would say— that currently says Department of Health or Department of Veterans Affairs or Department of Licensing would all have to change to say Health and Human Services.
In
Out
33:50
And all the envelopes and everything like that would have to change, not to mention all of the other paperwork.
In
Out
33:57
And I know that seems so insignificant, but that— there's a cost to that as well.
In
Out
34:02
We haven't thought that through.
In
Out
34:04
That's not a question.
In
Out
34:05
I'm so sorry.
In
Out
34:06
Because that question really belongs to the Chief Operating Officer.
In
Out
34:11
I want to ask her that at some point.
In
Out
34:14
But as the chair, it's not appropriate for me to start with that.
In
Out
34:17
So I think everyone's done asking you questions at this time.
In
Out
34:21
Anyone else for either Director Amaral, Director Gomes, or COO Connolly?
In
Out
34:27
Chair recognizes Councilor Gomes.
In
Out
34:29
Thank you, Director Sloan.
In
Out
34:31
Whoever wants to come up first.
In
Out
34:35
Director Gomes.
In
Out
34:37
Chair recognizes Councilor Gomes on his first.
In
Out
34:39
Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
In
Out
34:42
G-Man, how are you?
In
Out
34:43
Good, yourself?
In
Out
34:43
Always a pleasure to see you.
In
Out
34:45
Same.
In
Out
34:45
Um, can you tell me how you feel?
In
Out
34:49
And I would like your honest opinion.
In
Out
34:51
You've always been an honest department head.
In
Out
34:54
Me and you have banged heads a couple of times, but we clear it up because you're able to explain how things are done and whatever.
In
Out
35:03
Will this affect the veterans in any way that you see that won't be in the positive that you— the services that have been provided?
In
Out
35:12
The biggest effect, which everyone is aware of, was losing our clerk.
In
Out
35:16
I can't hear you.
In
Out
35:16
The biggest effect was losing our clerk in the office.
In
Out
35:19
That's not easily replaced, as that person knows veterans benefits services.
In
Out
35:24
She's been to a veterans conference.
In
Out
35:27
She had access to the military records online.
In
Out
35:31
So by her leaving, there was a big loss in that.
In
Out
35:35
What are they telling— who's going to handle this paperwork now for you?
In
Out
35:38
I didn't even think of this, but that's so significant within your department to have someone that does this work.
In
Out
35:45
And has done this work for some time, there's no room for mistakes in your department as far as I'm concerned when it comes to a veteran.
In
Out
35:54
No, you never want to make mistakes with veterans.
In
Out
35:55
You know what I mean.
In
Out
35:56
Yeah, I know what you mean.
In
Out
35:57
Whether it's paperwork, I didn't want to hear a veteran coming back saying that my paperwork wasn't right or we didn't submit it right because the right clerk wasn't taking care of this person.
In
Out
36:06
How significant is that going to affect you?
In
Out
36:10
We will always do the best that we do.
In
Out
36:12
Nothing will ever be sent out that's wrong.
In
Out
36:15
So I can guarantee you that one on that.
In
Out
36:18
Your eyes will be on— your eyes— you still have the power within your department for your eyes to be on everything.
In
Out
36:25
And if you don't see it right, you'll be able to address it immediately.
In
Out
36:29
Yes, I have had discussions with Director Sloan and we're both on the same page of, you know, Veterans is still the Veterans Department.
In
Out
36:38
We're falling under Health and Human Services.
In
Out
36:40
I'm open to see how this does go forward.
In
Out
36:44
Again, I was here just after they had switched over and took in veterans, taken veterans out of Health and Human Services.
In
Out
36:51
So all I've really known is to be our own separate department for a while.
In
Out
36:56
So I'm open to see what the next steps are.
In
Out
36:59
But as, as long as we continue to serve the veterans, that's the job of our department.
In
Out
37:05
Thank you.
In
Out
37:08
Anyone else for Director Gomes?
In
Out
37:12
All right, seeing none, thank you, Director Gomes.
In
Out
37:21
Councilor Gomes.
In
Out
37:22
Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
In
Out
37:23
Good evening.
In
Out
37:23
Christine, this question is the same.
In
Out
37:25
Um, the licensing board has its own system I've watched that system for a couple of 3 decades, and I'm not ashamed to say it, and it's always worked the way it has.
In
Out
37:37
Do you believe that this can work under the structure that it's coming under?
In
Out
37:42
And you can answer me honestly.
In
Out
37:46
No, I'll answer you honestly.
In
Out
37:48
I do believe it can work.
In
Out
37:50
I think it's going to work great.
In
Out
37:53
I look forward to starting the process of moving my office over to the HHS facility.
In
Out
38:02
I look forward to working with the group of people that they have there working currently with the Health Department.
In
Out
38:10
They've been very helpful for me in doing licensing.
In
Out
38:14
I've reached out many times and they've always been there to help answer questions, concerns.
In
Out
38:23
Okay, so you don't have any problem?
In
Out
38:24
You have no concerns with this right now, and you're willing to put your right foot forward to make this work?
In
Out
38:31
Under, um, what I believe is that this is about the people, this is about the services that you, you run.
In
Out
38:38
You have a, a very hard job.
In
Out
38:41
Licenses in, in the city is not easy.
In
Out
38:44
Um, it has to be another department that has to be accurate, on time, working with the businesses, especially when it comes to the liquor and everything.
In
Out
38:53
I just want to make sure that you're feeling very comfortable and you believe that this can work.
In
Out
38:58
I am.
In
Out
38:59
Absolutely.
In
Out
39:00
Thank you for your honesty.
In
Out
39:01
Sure.
In
Out
39:03
Anyone else for Director Amaral?
In
Out
39:06
I just have one question.
In
Out
39:08
Sure.
In
Out
39:09
How long was your clerk with you in your department, or I guess before you became the head of licensing.
In
Out
39:17
I'm sorry, how long was Rena here?
In
Out
39:20
Yes, I believe 38 and a half years.
In
Out
39:22
38.
In
Out
39:23
Okay, we'll round it up to 39 years.
In
Out
39:26
Okay, perfect.
In
Out
39:27
All right.
In
Out
39:28
And so now essentially licensing is just you at this point?
In
Out
39:32
Yes.
In
Out
39:32
And the board, obviously.
In
Out
39:33
Yes.
In
Out
39:33
Okay.
In
Out
39:34
All right.
In
Out
39:35
Thank you so much.
In
Out
39:36
You're welcome.
In
Out
39:37
Anyone else for Director Emeril?
In
Out
39:40
Thank you.
In
Out
39:41
Okay, good evening, Councillor Gomes.
In
Out
39:51
Christine, good evening.
In
Out
39:52
Good evening.
In
Out
39:53
Thanks for being here.
In
Out
39:54
Sure.
In
Out
39:55
Um, this structure is— I'm— I haven't had the opportunity to talk to you, but, um, I've seen this before and I, I've seen it not work, and I, I just, uh I don't want to disrupt the services that are rendered from each and every department that come under there.
In
Out
40:13
I think they're vital and very important to the people of this city, and we shouldn't be— I'm not going to say that— messing with them, because we're not messing with them.
In
Out
40:21
You're trying to combine something.
In
Out
40:26
Do you have complete confidence that this can work under this umbrella that has been established?
In
Out
40:31
And this comes in April, and I'm trying to go back in a timeline of You're talking about this in April.
In
Out
40:36
No one has said anything about the budget quite yet.
In
Out
40:41
I'm just kind of— I don't want to call it suspicious, but it's almost like there was workings already before we were even talking about layoffs or we were talking about monies.
In
Out
40:53
Maybe I could be wrong.
In
Out
40:55
Time passes very quickly, but we're talking about April, I was told tonight.
In
Out
40:59
Came May, June, halfway through July.
In
Out
41:02
That's 2 months.
In
Out
41:05
Yeah, so it came about as a result of analyzing the budget and needing to submit to this body a balanced budget, and that required, as everybody is well aware, $32 million of binding— $32 million roughly of savings.
In
Out
41:23
So we had to turn over every rock and to try to find that find that savings.
In
Out
41:29
And so this consolidation was a way, as we've pointed out, $1.18+ million is, um, we were able to save that through this consolidation.
In
Out
41:41
And granted, that is mostly through the elimination of positions, either vacant positions, retirements, or in some cases layoffs.
In
Out
41:50
And that this would not have been the way we would want to do this consolidation, But frankly, I've had this thought for years that this— because it is a common model and it works at various levels of government and it works at other local governments.
In
Out
42:10
I don't mean to stop you.
In
Out
42:11
It's just because you pointed out something.
In
Out
42:13
It's a common model.
In
Out
42:14
Common model where?
In
Out
42:16
Well, it's what the federal government has.
In
Out
42:18
It's what the state government has.
In
Out
42:20
And then Director Sloan is probably in a better position to tell you where else.
In
Out
42:24
You know, our peer cities, what their models are.
In
Out
42:27
But I believe it's pretty common in our peer cities, both in the Commonwealth and outside in other states.
In
Out
42:35
It's a common model.
In
Out
42:37
So I've thought that for years that it might be a good thing for us to do at some point.
In
Out
42:45
We— again, this would not have been our preferred way to do it, to have to lay off people.
In
Out
42:51
And eliminate positions.
In
Out
42:53
Um, that we didn't— certainly wouldn't— weren't doing that gleefully or with relish.
In
Out
43:00
We, um, we took that very seriously and took it very hard that this is what we had to do, um, to present a balanced budget to this body.
In
Out
43:11
So it's again one of the things that we did among many.
In
Out
43:14
Um, but I don't I'm optimistic about the model.
In
Out
43:19
And again, it would have been something I, you know, I've talked to Stephanie and I've talked to other, you know, colleagues in the mayor's office about this model, you know, over time.
In
Out
43:33
So this is coming out of the chief of staff's thoughts or whatever as you do your daily work.
In
Out
43:40
I keep hearing you say, I had this thought, I had this thought.
In
Out
43:44
No, it wasn't Like the mayor had this.
In
Out
43:46
No, I mean, it was a, it was a model I've— because I've, you know, I've observed that it exists in other, in other cities and seems to work.
In
Out
43:54
And as Stephanie pointed out, all the synergies and efficiencies.
In
Out
43:58
And I've over the years basically said maybe, maybe we should consider doing this at some point, kind of in that way.
In
Out
44:07
And then this sort of, this circumstance of this budget year kind of forced our hand a bit.
In
Out
44:14
While I have you standing there, if I could ask you a question, maybe you'll be able to answer it or not.
In
Out
44:19
When did you know that we were in trouble as far as finances were concerned?
In
Out
44:26
When did your— the mayor's office, I'll ask, know that we were in trouble?
In
Out
44:30
Because, you know, just 2 weeks before that, we're proposing a $100 million police station.
In
Out
44:36
We're continuing to do some other things that we're doing.
In
Out
44:39
And there's no whisper of this unless the whisper was among certain people.
In
Out
44:43
People or whatever.
In
Out
44:45
Um, when did, when did you find out?
In
Out
44:47
You know, sometime— and so sometime around just before the mayor's, um, State of the City address.
In
Out
44:52
If you recall, in the State of the City address, he mentioned an $18 million gap at that time.
In
Out
45:00
So that was the— probably just prior to that, so in March sometime, um, while— as we were— as, as the CFO's office was really poring over the budget submittals from all of our departments.
In
Out
45:15
The budgets are due, you know, the departmental budgets are due in February, and then it takes quite a few, you know, it takes several weeks for the CFO's office to sort of compile all that information and analyze it.
In
Out
45:27
And so it was probably sometime in late March where we got an inkling that we had, you know, we had a significant problem And then, and then, um, it proceeded from there.
In
Out
45:39
So you're telling me this problem kind of originated as you were doing the budget because you had department heads walking into your office submitting their budgets with no idea that this was coming?
In
Out
45:50
Um, it, again, it took, it took until like we got, we had all the budget information from the various departments together and had the time to analyze it, the CFO's office, where we discovered what our gap was.
In
Out
46:04
Last question.
In
Out
46:05
If this is not to work or we see gaps in this situation, this model, um, that seems— you're telling me that's on the federal level.
In
Out
46:15
I'd like to know what towns and cities are doing that in Commonwealth.
In
Out
46:18
We can probably get you that, right, Stephanie?
In
Out
46:21
Yeah.
In
Out
46:21
And as close to this model as this.
In
Out
46:24
Sure.
In
Out
46:25
Nothing.
In
Out
46:25
Um, if you— if, uh, has there been consideration if this model affects the services in any way to the people of this city how you would recorrect this.
In
Out
46:35
Yeah, we, we should always have Plan A, Plan B.
In
Out
46:38
We should.
In
Out
46:39
Yeah, I, I agree.
In
Out
46:40
So for example, if we discover that a particular division under this consolidated model is, is lacking, like, um, you know, lacking a point person, let's, for lack of a better word, a person who really owns the you know, the mission and purview of that department, of that division, then that would be an example of something.
In
Out
47:07
Well, we're seeing there's a lack there.
In
Out
47:08
So we would think, all right, maybe this— maybe we need to add back a position.
In
Out
47:14
Of course, that would be difficult in this budget environment.
In
Out
47:19
That's how I see we might make adjustments.
In
Out
47:21
I wouldn't— I don't think there's going to be a reason to pull it apart.
In
Out
47:26
And, and may do it, you know, do, do it separately again.
In
Out
47:30
But there may be gaps that we discover because of the reduction in positions that we, you know, that we had to do.
In
Out
47:38
And we may discover that those, those aren't as tenable as we thought they would be.
In
Out
47:44
Thank you very much.
In
Out
47:45
Thank you.
In
Out
47:46
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
In
Out
47:47
Thank you.
In
Out
47:47
And I just want to acknowledge that Director Sloan did provide us a one-sheet that, uh, one of our clerks did print out.
In
Out
47:56
We should receive it, place that on file.
In
Out
47:59
Uh, motion receiving, place on file, made by Councilor Gomes, seconded by Councilor Pemberton.
In
Out
48:05
Anyone on the question?
In
Out
48:06
Seeing none, all those in favor say aye.
In
Out
48:08
Aye.
In
Out
48:09
All the— oh, sorry.
In
Out
48:11
All those of you say aye.
In
Out
48:12
Any opposed?
In
Out
48:13
The ayes have it.
In
Out
48:13
Sorry.
In
Out
48:14
So yeah, just to clear, uh, there were, uh, uh, city The city's coalitions are Brockton, Worcester, Lowell, Newton, Somerville, Springfield, and Fall River that's listed here.
In
Out
48:25
So thank you to Director Sloan for putting this fact sheet together for us.
In
Out
48:30
And you have a copy of that too.
In
Out
48:33
Okay.
In
Out
48:33
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
In
Out
48:34
I didn't get— I didn't read that part.
In
Out
48:36
This was handed to us.
In
Out
48:37
No, we just got it printed.
In
Out
48:39
I know, because our clerk doesn't even have a copy of it, but we'll get him a copy.
In
Out
48:43
And if anyone else doesn't have a copy of it, we'll make sure you get one for you.
In
Out
48:48
With that, Councilor Roy on his first.
In
Out
48:51
Thank you.
In
Out
48:52
Hi, Christine.
In
Out
48:52
How are you?
In
Out
48:53
Hi, Councilor Roy.
In
Out
48:53
I'm well, thank you.
In
Out
48:55
Great.
In
Out
48:55
Thanks.
In
Out
48:56
I'm curious.
In
Out
48:57
You mentioned something about, about, you know, if we find we need to add employees, you know, to this type of arrangement, we might be able to do that.
In
Out
49:11
Does this type of arrangement lend itself to, say, returning like all of the employees we, we let go during this cycle?
In
Out
49:20
Like, is this type of arrangement like the type of arrangement where, where we could have, you know, the type of, the type of, you know, personnel to serve the city the way we've been having it?
In
Out
49:33
Yeah.
In
Out
49:33
You know, recently, I mean, if resources allowed and we wanted to add back some of the— also some of the work areas that we, that we have eliminated from the, um, say, for example, the Community Services Division.
In
Out
49:51
Um, if we, you know, speaking of gaps, if we said, well, yeah, there really is this gap where we're seeing a need that is not being fulfilled in the city because of this person or this function missing from the HHS model and funding being, you know, funding allowed, either general, you know, city general funds, or perhaps it's a grant.
In
Out
50:21
You can go for grants that pay for positions for specific kinds of activities.
In
Out
50:26
So maybe we'd go at it that way.
In
Out
50:29
But it would just be dependent on— but if, you know, if we saw a really critical need not being met.
In
Out
50:35
I don't foresee that happening with this, with this model, because really of the very strong team we have across the board in the division, in the divisions, all, you know, all of the divisions involved in this, in this new consolidated department.
In
Out
50:52
I don't foresee that happening because I, I know how these, I know how these folks work and how they are how dedicated they are and how hardworking they are, so I don't foresee that happening.
In
Out
51:03
But if we did, and like Stephanie said, there are also new things we might discover we want to do as an HHS department, and that might require more people, and that might mean a grant that's specific to that activity, whatever it is, that would come with a position.
In
Out
51:23
Okay, so the answer was The answer was no, right?
In
Out
51:26
Like this, I don't foresee us putting it all back together again and, and, and kind of adding back every position.
In
Out
51:33
Okay.
In
Out
51:34
All right.
In
Out
51:34
Thank you so much.
In
Out
51:34
Sure.
In
Out
51:35
Thank you, Mr.
In
Out
51:35
Chair.
In
Out
51:38
Anyone else on the floor for— Chair recognizes Councilor Oliver.
In
Out
51:41
Thank you, Mr.
In
Out
51:42
Chair.
In
Out
51:43
Thank you, Christina.
In
Out
51:43
Sure.
In
Out
51:44
For being here.
In
Out
51:45
Uh, so March, we're getting ready for the State of the City.
In
Out
51:48
April 8th is the State of the City.
In
Out
51:51
And then the administration, the mayor's office starts taking meetings April 22nd, 23rd, 24th.
In
Out
52:00
Spoke with a couple of colleagues that have taken those meetings.
In
Out
52:03
I was not one of the, the councilors that took the meetings, mainly because of reasons like this.
In
Out
52:10
Why wasn't this discussed then?
In
Out
52:14
Why wasn't the HHS consolidation idea discussed?
In
Out
52:18
Yeah.
In
Out
52:18
Yeah.
In
Out
52:19
Um, we, we weren't certain about it, to be frank.
In
Out
52:23
We, we— there was still a lot, there was still a lot of moving parts in the development of the budget and in the quest for finding the $32-odd million of, um, of savings and revenue to fill, you know, to be able to present a balanced budget.
In
Out
52:41
So it wasn't— we didn't feel like it was like quite ready to discuss outside because— and when we met with, I think, when in both cases, the 2 or 3 meetings we had with counselors, we had not yet discussed it with all of the departments involved.
In
Out
53:05
We— I believe I had discussed it with Director Sloan because she was going to be the you know, she was going to be the theoretical new department head.
In
Out
53:14
But we had not— because we had not made any decisions, any final decisions, we had not yet, um, started talking to the other implicated departments yet.
In
Out
53:23
So we didn't think it was appropriate to discuss it with the counselors at that point.
In
Out
53:29
Okay.
In
Out
53:29
All right, that's all.
In
Out
53:31
I just wanted to kind of get that out there and see where— it's a good question— the administration was thinking at that point.
In
Out
53:37
Point because, yeah, it's just, you know, kind of proves that sometimes those meetings aren't the best when we don't have all the facts.
In
Out
53:48
Because if they took those meetings and we didn't get this information until later on, although I'm sure some productive conversations were had, this, this is a big one.
In
Out
54:01
And I know that it was kind of— it really was not finalized yet.
In
Out
54:05
And as I said, I think the most important thing is that we had not yet discussed it with most of the implicated department heads.
In
Out
54:13
And as a— as the legislative body who would oversee the change of this, did it— wasn't the thought process of the administration to at least have those conversations with the council, or they just didn't think that the council should be privy to it yet?
In
Out
54:34
Um, I don't know if it's not.
In
Out
54:36
I mean, it's, it's sort of the typical way we present, you know, that we do our budget presentation.
In
Out
54:42
And so yes, it was a bigger than normal or a more, um, significant and impactful than normal change to the budget that we made.
In
Out
54:52
Um, but it was part of that process of budget development, which always You know, which is always the, you know, it's submitted, the mayor makes his presentation, and then the body deliberates for those, you know, for those weeks where it is able to ask the questions and kick the tires.
In
Out
55:11
So we, I guess we just thought this is that vetting and that those conversations will happen in that context.
In
Out
55:18
Okay.
In
Out
55:19
So no.
In
Out
55:20
All right.
In
Out
55:21
Thank you.
In
Out
55:22
Thank you, Mr.
In
Out
55:23
Chair.
In
Out
55:25
Anyone else for Chief Connolly?
In
Out
55:29
All right, you feel allowed from the chair.
In
Out
55:32
My favorite line of the night is, it seems to work.
In
Out
55:36
And that is why I think we need to take a pause.
In
Out
55:42
I know, to steal my colleague from Jenny Lynn's line.
In
Out
55:46
Is that a quote from me?
In
Out
55:47
Yes.
In
Out
55:48
Okay.
In
Out
55:48
I mean, it's It's kind of a loop.
In
Out
55:51
It works in other cities, certainly.
In
Out
55:53
And I think to my colleague from Clara Street, I shouldn't have said seems.
In
Out
55:57
I should have been— no, listen, I think it's the realest thing that you've said all night because it's one of those situations where we don't have enough data on it.
In
Out
56:07
We don't know if it will work in New Bedford yet because we haven't seen it actually play out.
In
Out
56:13
And that's why I feel as though if we are going to go down this route, how will it affect the employees?
In
Out
56:20
How will it affect the actual business or government?
In
Out
56:26
My confusion, I guess, of it all is the only real employees that don't have a director anymore are community service and parks and recreation and beaches.
In
Out
56:36
And so they don't have a direct report.
In
Out
56:39
But I just don't see the need to change all of these systems when we don't really know what we're doing.
In
Out
56:48
If we had a particular model, let's say Fall River's or Springfield's, that we could point you to say, yes, we want to model this.
In
Out
56:54
And even my colleague from Hussey Street, you know, pointed out, well, you might realize, you know, halfway through the fiscal year that, oh, in order for this to work out, we need to hire this person to strengthen this area.
In
Out
57:08
That's what I you know, believe we need more time to see how it will actually work out.
In
Out
57:12
Because to your own admission, this was kind of just, oh, we need to save some money here.
In
Out
57:19
Let's consolidate these departments and do Health and Human Services.
In
Out
57:22
It wasn't— I think I would appreciate it more if it was an actual management decision of, hey, let's consolidate and make a smaller government.
In
Out
57:31
But you've already reduced everywhere else.
In
Out
57:35
When we're looking at public safety, there was 51 reductions between police and fire, but we're not making any huge structural changes there.
In
Out
57:43
So I just don't see the need to, especially with a department like Community Services.
In
Out
57:47
I'm really worried because of how instrumental they were to the community, hence the name Community Services.
In
Out
57:56
And so I don't see why now the city council should go through this work of changing all these things when the administration, as always, never clues us in, never works with us, never collaborates with us, but then last minute says, you got to do this, just do it.
In
Out
58:16
No.
In
Out
58:16
So it would be my intention, I hope my colleagues agree, that we wait, see how this plays out, try to support the remaining department heads that are here.
In
Out
58:27
And I guess That's the one question I'll ask of you is, are they even department heads in this model?
In
Out
58:35
Director Amaral and Director Gomes?
In
Out
58:37
No, they're not.
In
Out
58:39
So what would happen?
In
Out
58:39
In this model, they wouldn't be department heads.
In
Out
58:41
They would be division leaders.
In
Out
58:44
And what would happen to their titles then in that case?
In
Out
58:47
I think for the incumbent employees, I wouldn't change.
In
Out
58:54
I don't think it's necessary to change titles.
In
Out
58:56
Lots of city employees have like a title that's in the Code of Ordinances in the, in the chart and have a different working title.
In
Out
59:05
So that would be the case with, with Director Gomes.
In
Out
59:10
And Christine's title is already executive aide to the licensing board.
In
Out
59:15
So it's not— it isn't now a department head title.
In
Out
59:19
Yes, I know this administration loves just slapping titles on, similar to our chief operating officer or chief of staff position, but I would feel more comfortable waiting this out, seeing how we can support parks and recreation community service staff who I feel already don't know what's going on for them.
In
Out
59:38
They don't know who they're reporting to.
In
Out
59:41
We can figure that out, but until we actually know How are we supporting these, not just the staff, but the actual community that are coming into City Hall and trying to utilize these services?
In
Out
59:54
Why would we go through the process of making these extreme changes not only to our city ordinances, but again to the paperwork, the letterheads, the envelopes and all that just to find out, oh, actually this doesn't work and then to change it back?
In
Out
1:00:07
That's my only feel of this.
In
Out
1:00:10
That's course your prerogative.
In
Out
1:00:13
Anyone else for Chief Connolly at this time?
In
Out
1:00:17
All right.
In
Out
1:00:18
Well, anyone else for any of our other division leader department heads, employees?
In
Out
1:00:25
Wonderful.
In
Out
1:00:26
With that, I would entertain a motion to table at this time.
In
Out
1:00:29
So moved.
In
Out
1:00:30
Made by Councilor Oliver, seconded by Councilor Carney.
In
Out
1:00:33
All those in favor say aye.
In
Out
1:00:35
Any opposed?
In
Out
1:00:36
The ayes have it.
In
Out
1:00:37
Motion to adjourn made by Councilor Pemberton, seconded by Councilor Oliver.
In
Out
1:00:42
Anyone on, uh, the question?
In
Out
1:00:44
Seeing none, all those in favor say aye.
In
Out
1:00:47
Any opposed?
In
Out
1:00:48
The ayes have it.
In
Out
1:00:49
We are adjourned at 8:05 post-meridian.
In
Out
1:00:53
Thank you.
In
Out