City of New Bedford Meetings
Search and subscribe to city meeting topics that impact you
Newsletters
Subscribe
← Back to video
Special City Council Meeting — May 13, 2026
−
Fit
+
IN
0:00
OUT
0:00
Length
0:00
▶ Play selection
Export clip
Keyboard:
I
set in,
O
set out,
←
/
→
nudge playhead 5s.
1:06
Good evening, ladies and gentlemen.
In
Out
1:08
Tonight is, uh, Wednesday, May 13th, 2026, at 7:00 PM.
In
Out
1:14
I'm calling together a special city council meeting for the fiscal year '27 budget submission.
In
Out
1:20
I would like to, uh, we don't have a member of the clergy with us tonight, so if we could all take a moment of silence, please.
In
Out
1:37
Thank you.
In
Out
1:39
We'll be led in the Pledge of Allegiance tonight by Councilor of Ward 4, Derek Baptiste.
In
Out
1:44
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
In
Out
1:55
Indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
In
Out
2:04
Thank you.
In
Out
2:06
I would like to note that this meeting is being live streamed and recorded.
In
Out
2:10
City Council and committee meetings can be viewed on the City of New Bedford's homepage under Quick Links, then Meetings.
In
Out
2:16
I am joined tonight in the council chamber by my colleagues, Councilor-at-Large Ian Abreu, Councilor of Ward 2, Scott Pemberton.
In
Out
2:23
Councilor of Ward 5, Joseph Lopes.
In
Out
2:26
Councilor at Large, Brian Gomes.
In
Out
2:28
Councilor at Large, James Roy.
In
Out
2:31
Councilor at Large, Naomi Carney.
In
Out
2:34
Councilor of Ward 3, Sean Oliver.
In
Out
2:36
Councilor at Large, Shane Burgo, and First Vice President.
In
Out
2:39
And Councilor of Ward 4, Derek Baptiste.
In
Out
2:42
I am the Councilor of Ward 6 and City Council President, Ryan Pereira.
In
Out
2:46
I will ask the clerk at this time if there are any letters to be read into the record.
In
Out
2:49
Mr. President, I have one.
In
Out
2:51
This is from Councilor Choquette.
In
Out
2:52
Dear Council President Pereira and honorable members of the City Council, I'm writing to inform you that I'll be unable to attend the mayor's FY27 budget submission meeting on Wednesday, May 13th, as my wife will be having emergency surgery in Boston.
In
Out
3:05
Please read this letter into the record to make my colleagues and the public aware the reason for my absence.
In
Out
3:09
Sincerely, Leo Choquette, Councilor Ward 1.
In
Out
3:12
Motion to receive and place on file.
In
Out
3:14
Motion to receive and place on file made by Councilor Oliver, seconded by Councilor Lopes.
In
Out
3:18
Anyone on the question?
In
Out
3:19
All those in favor say aye.
In
Out
3:21
Opposed?
In
Out
3:22
The ayes have it.
In
Out
3:23
We'll ask the clerk to read item number 1, please.
In
Out
3:25
Mr. President, item 1 is communication from Council President Pereira to City Clerk Dennis Farias requesting that a special city council meeting be called for Wednesday, May 13th, 2026 at 7 PM for the submittal of the FY27 City of New Bedford proposed budget.
In
Out
3:42
Motion received and placed on file.
In
Out
3:43
Motion received and placed on file.
In
Out
3:45
The communication's been made by Councilor Burgos, seconded by Councilor Abreu.
In
Out
3:49
Anyone on the question?
In
Out
3:52
All those in favor say aye.
In
Out
3:54
Aye.
In
Out
3:55
Opposed?
In
Out
3:55
The ayes have it.
In
Out
3:56
Uh, at this time the council will take a brief recess, uh, to go and get Mayor Mitchell.
In
Out
4:03
We're going to come back to session, please.
In
Out
4:08
Council President Pereira, honorable members of New Bedford City Council, Mayor of the City of New Bedford, Jonathan Mitchell.
In
Out
4:25
Thank you, Mr. President.
In
Out
4:36
Good evening, everyone.
In
Out
4:39
As we gather here tonight for the annual presentation of the city's proposed budget.
In
Out
4:45
You no doubt have sensed that this is no ordinary year.
In
Out
4:50
Amid reports of local governments struggling to pay their bills, and after years of warnings from me and from others about the growing sources of pressure on the city's finances, I'm here to tell you that your instincts are right.
In
Out
5:10
Going into this budget season, the gap between what is needed to run the city and the money available to us was $32 million.
In
Out
5:25
This is more than twice the largest gap in the last 15 years— far too large to be addressed by the incremental measures of past years.
In
Out
5:36
Years.
In
Out
5:37
The only responsible way to balance the budget for the coming year, as we must do under state law, is to increase revenue and reduce services.
In
Out
5:52
That is only for the coming fiscal year.
In
Out
5:56
The budget is still in a long-term imbalance.
In
Out
6:02
Because the cost of city government is projected to rise faster than the revenue coming in, still more sacrifices will be necessary to stabilize the budget.
In
Out
6:14
This is a difficult reality.
In
Out
6:17
The current state of our finances feels out of place with the city's hard-earned recent successes— lower crime rates, waterfront construction, new housing, and growing arts and restaurant scene an improved reputation, and so much more.
In
Out
6:34
But to those who have observed or participated in the budget process of late, it should not be the least bit surprising.
In
Out
6:45
Over the last several years, in budget presentations, State of the City addresses, and countless media appearances, I have explicitly warned that our ability to operate city government effectively and affordably was being suffocated by diminished state aid and growing non-discretionary costs such as pension and healthcare obligations.
In
Out
7:11
New Bedford is hardly alone among Massachusetts cities and towns that are struggling with the fact that the state has not kept up its obligation to fund general government aid.
In
Out
7:23
This spring, there have been nearly daily reports of layoffs of municipal employees around Massachusetts.
In
Out
7:30
But I also have repeatedly said that the council's unwillingness to rein in the growth of healthcare and pension costs would make our budget unsustainable.
In
Out
7:42
And as I stand here today, I wish I were wrong.
In
Out
7:47
For a few years, we were able to keep things going through a series of efficiency measures.
In
Out
7:52
These steps were appropriate, but they're not nearly enough.
In
Out
7:57
The reality is that the budget has reached a boiling point.
In
Out
8:02
The tough decisions can no longer be avoided.
In
Out
8:07
Today, I am presenting to you my best effort at achieving a balanced budget while minimizing the impact on city services and the disruption in the professional and personal lives of our employees.
In
Out
8:23
In the next few minutes, I will explain in detail how we got here, what steps are necessary to balance this year's budget, and what we must do together to set the city's finances on a more stable course.
In
Out
8:41
Let's begin with the revenue side of the budget.
In
Out
8:45
City government relies on a variety of funding streams.
In
Out
8:49
Many of them support specific activities, such as user fees for water and wastewater services and federal and state grants for discrete programs.
In
Out
8:59
Most of city government, however, is funded from 2 sources: property tax receipts, and local aid from the state.
In
Out
9:10
Massachusetts has 2 major local aid programs for city services: state education aid, sometimes called Chapter 70 aid, which can only be used for the schools, and unrestricted general government aid, which is used for the rest of city government.
In
Out
9:28
In the last several years, thanks to legislation called the Student Opportunity Act, State education aid has increased significantly, and our school department is better funded than it has been in a long time.
In
Out
9:40
But as you no doubt have heard in the media, unrestricted aid has fallen far behind.
In
Out
9:46
The problem originated with the 2008 financial crisis, which prompted the state to impose significant local aid cuts and merge 2 existing, existing local aid programs together.
In
Out
9:59
As you can see from this graph right here, and you've seen some variant of this before, once the financial aid crisis passed, the state didn't restore the earlier funding level.
In
Out
10:12
Instead, it increased aid year over year steadily, but at rates lower than inflation.
In
Out
10:19
And so you end up with this big gap right there.
In
Out
10:23
Now remarkably, remarkably, this current fiscal year was the first time we received more unrestricted aid than we did in 2009.
In
Out
10:37
Think about that for a second.
In
Out
10:39
Think about how much more expensive everything has gotten since 2009.
In
Out
10:45
The red line shows where aid would have been had it kept up with the rate of inflation.
In
Out
10:50
And that's the gap right there, ladies and gentlemen.
In
Out
10:54
Had the state kept up its local aid commitment, we would have received approximately $13 million more— $13 million more this current year.
In
Out
11:03
Last week, to much fanfare, the State Senate proposed an increase in unrestricted aid that would result in about $600,000 more for New Bedford than the House of Representatives number.
In
Out
11:16
Now, the Senate's effort was laudable, but it barely makes a dent in that $13 million gap.
In
Out
11:23
As the state has steadily closed off the spigot of local aid, local taxpayers, of course, have footed more of the cost of local government.
In
Out
11:32
And so you might ask, well, how could that happen?
In
Out
11:37
Simple answer is that the state officials don't have to answer for higher local property tax bills.
In
Out
11:44
However unfair it may be, local officials get the call when the tax bills go up, even if the reason is that the state has not kept up its end of the bargain.
In
Out
11:55
Lest anyone listening to this would suggest that we're simply begging the state to bail us out, or that we're casting blame in the general direction of Boston, make— it is important to note that state aid is not charity.
In
Out
12:13
For various reasons, the state has an obligation to help fund local government.
In
Out
12:18
For one thing, the benefits of municipal services are enjoyed by people who don't live in town, and this is especially true for a center city like New Bedford where people come and go all the time.
In
Out
12:30
So when someone from Fairhaven decides to go out to dinner in the city, We don't tell them, oh, I'm sorry, because you don't pay taxes in New Bedford, we're not going to send an ambulance if you get into a bad car accident.
In
Out
12:44
We don't do that.
In
Out
12:45
It's only fair then that the responsibility for funding such services is spread beyond the city's borders.
In
Out
12:55
The state also imposes all sorts of mandates on municipalities that require us to spend money.
In
Out
13:01
For instance, as we'll discuss in a moment, we're required to pay for employee healthcare and pensions under very specific terms that are quite costly.
In
Out
13:11
If the state doesn't back up these mandates with funding, local taxpayers have to foot the bill, and they have.
In
Out
13:21
For years, I've advocated that the state must do more, and I appreciate that members of the council have raised their voices as well.
In
Out
13:31
And I will tell you here, we cannot let up this effort even if it isn't an overnight exercise.
In
Out
13:38
Then there's the cost side of the equation.
In
Out
13:42
This year's general fund budget totals $535 million.
In
Out
13:49
This familiar pie chart right here depicts the major components.
In
Out
13:56
As, as you all know, you've seen this every year.
In
Out
13:59
As the council is aware, the city's ability to control certain items in the budget is constrained again by state law.
In
Out
14:08
The largest component, of course, is the school department, which now comprises 66% of the general fund budget, the big purple piece right there.
In
Out
14:17
So the most important thing to remember is that we budget schools at the so-called foundational level.
In
Out
14:24
We do so not because we believe that schools don't need more money, but it's all that we can afford.
In
Out
14:32
Because the foundation level— foundation budget level is the minimum allowed under state law, we cannot reduce the size of that largest slice of the pie.
In
Out
14:45
Now, many councilors recall that the school department was only about 40% of the budget just a few years ago.
In
Out
14:51
One reason that it's much larger now has to do with an accounting decision we made a few years ago to assign the cost of healthcare for school employees to the school department's budget, which was an appropriate thing to do.
In
Out
15:04
But the other reason is that the Student Opportunity Act, which I noted significantly increased the amount of state education aid also required the city to raise its contribution to the school foundation budget.
In
Out
15:19
That share has gone up 6.6% in each of the last 3 years.
In
Out
15:25
The upshot is that the school department budget has grown faster than the rest of the budget, and it has required a larger contribution from the city each year, and it can't be reduced.
In
Out
15:38
Pensions are another major cost contributing to the city's burden on taxpayers.
In
Out
15:44
State law dictates that the city must make yearly payments to the retirement system to eliminate the system's unfunded liability.
In
Out
15:52
In other words, to ensure that the— that there are sufficient funds in place for retiree pensions.
In
Out
15:59
As the next chart starkly shows, Right there, that one.
In
Out
16:05
The city will be obligated to make larger payments every year because, thanks to some short-sighted decisions both locally and at the state level in years past, New Bedford has one of the lowest funded retirement plans in the state.
In
Out
16:22
On this front too, city government is constrained in its ability to control costs.
In
Out
16:26
State law does not allow the city or the city's retirement board to achieve savings by narrowing pension eligibility rules or reducing benefits.
In
Out
16:37
But the Retirement Board, along with the Council, do have the authority to increase benefits, which they have repeatedly done in recent years, adding millions to our unfunded pension liability and raising the city's required annual contributions every year.
In
Out
16:58
And I, I agree that under normal circumstances, we should figure out a way to support our retirees, especially as things are getting more expensive.
In
Out
17:10
But when pension costs are contributing to the crowding out of city services and a rise in property taxes We can't afford to add more to the bill.
In
Out
17:26
Then there's healthcare costs.
In
Out
17:29
As you know, employee health insurance is a substantial driver of cost increases in the city budget, and as such, it is a major contributor to the property taxpayer burden— property tax burden on New Bedford residents.
In
Out
17:44
Healthcare costs have risen 10% in each of the last 2 years, and are projected to do so again this year.
In
Out
17:51
This far outstrips the new growth in the city's tax base, which is running at about 2% a year, so that doesn't compute.
In
Out
18:00
The increasing cost of healthcare is, of course, a national problem, but there are 2 reasons why healthcare costs for the City of New Bedford as an employer are higher than they could be.
In
Out
18:13
The first is that we pick up a large share of employee premiums, as it is starkly reflected in the chart— this next chart.
In
Out
18:23
And if you can't read it, you're all going to get copies of it.
In
Out
18:25
It all— you're all going to see this.
In
Out
18:27
The city of New Bedford pays 75% of premiums, which is far more than our suburbs pay.
In
Out
18:33
So there's every, every community in Greater New Bedford, and at the top is New Bedford, what we pay at 75%.
In
Out
18:41
And everybody else is lower and some way lower in terms of their share.
In
Out
18:47
So the CFO's office has calculated that what would happen if we reduced that share.
In
Out
18:55
Well, it works out to a pretty substantial number.
In
Out
18:58
For every percentage point, it's about $320,000 annually.
In
Out
19:04
It's a lot of money.
In
Out
19:05
It's a big difference.
In
Out
19:07
So you might ask, well, why, why don't we do that?
In
Out
19:09
That sounds pretty straightforward.
In
Out
19:10
Everybody else has done it.
In
Out
19:11
Everybody else around here has done it.
In
Out
19:14
So why not New Bedford?
In
Out
19:18
Well, the reason is pretty simple.
In
Out
19:22
Changes to premium splits require negotiations with the public employee unions, and to date they have been unwilling to entertain a lower premium split, period.
In
Out
19:32
Full stop.
In
Out
19:36
The other reason healthcare is more expensive here is that— than it could be— is that we have not adopted a law, namely Sections 21 to 23 of the Municipal Healthcare Reform Act, that would give the city greater authority to make sensible changes to healthcare benefits.
In
Out
19:54
In the absence of this authority, the unions wield an effective veto over any city proposal.
In
Out
20:02
Now, it doesn't have to be this way.
In
Out
20:05
Again, virtually every city and town in our region, along with the majority of municipalities and school districts statewide, have adopted Sections 21 to 23, and with good reason.
In
Out
20:16
They have realized measurable cost savings over time while still meeting employee— the employer's obligation to cover the healthcare of their employees.
In
Out
20:27
Sections 21 to 23 level the playing field between the unions and the taxpayers when healthcare plan redesigns are considered.
In
Out
20:35
When the parties don't agree, an independent arbiter decides whether the benefit levels are reasonable compared to other plans in Massachusetts.
In
Out
20:43
Now, I believe our employees deserve reliable healthcare, but as the slogan for the Liberty Mutual Insurance commercials go, which we all hear during football games, we should only pay for what we need.
In
Out
20:57
Without placing taxpayers on a level playing field, the city can expect more of the same— occasional tactical compromises from employee unions that will yield no significant budgetary savings.
In
Out
21:12
On 4 separate occasions, 4 separate occasions, I have proposed that the council adopt this modest measure.
In
Out
21:21
I did so because I believed it would be— it would enable us to achieve savings without an onerous imposition on employees so that we did not have to resort to more painful measures.
In
Out
21:34
Nearly everyone— again, nearly everyone else around here has done it, and the sky hasn't fallen.
In
Out
21:40
Yet the council has rejected it every time.
In
Out
21:44
It's fair to say at this point that these were missed opportunities.
In
Out
21:49
There are other decisions that have made matters more difficult this year.
In
Out
21:53
In the last 2 years, in an evident attempt to demonstrate its responsiveness to those who understandably complain about the increasing costs of government, the council resorted to measures that lent the appearance of fiscal responsibility, but actually made it more difficult to manage the budget.
In
Out
22:12
The council made cuts to items that the city could not realistically cut, either for legal or practical considerations that every— anybody can understand.
In
Out
22:21
For instance, the council cut the healthcare trust fund even though the city would be on the hook for employee healthcare claims no matter how much was budgeted.
In
Out
22:33
It cut the employer share of Social Security and Medicare payments, FICA.
In
Out
22:36
Right?
In
Out
22:37
Everybody sees that on their paychecks, even though federal law requires us to pay them.
In
Out
22:43
It even cut the amount set aside to pay the electricity bills of certain city buildings, which of course in 2026 is not realistic.
In
Out
22:53
These and similar other measures kept the tax levy down, but artificially so, as the bills still had to be paid.
In
Out
23:04
We were forced to use— we had no other choice but to use reserve funds, one-time funds, to fill the void.
In
Out
23:11
And as I pointed out in my State of the City address and elsewhere, this is not a sustainable practice.
In
Out
23:18
It prevents the tax levy from keeping up with the rising costs of government.
In
Out
23:23
Because costs such as mandated education, healthcare, and pension costs are going up fast, we are left with a wider gap between the amount of money we're taking in and what we are spending.
In
Out
23:34
And this has made the budget gap this year feel so much more sudden.
In
Out
23:40
When we add it all up, as I noted, the gap between the city's total revenue and costs as we started the budget process was $32 million.
In
Out
23:50
To put that number in perspective, the largest gap during my tenure at that point in the budget process has been $12 million.
In
Out
23:58
So how do we eliminate the gap, a gap that large, so that we can balance the budget?
In
Out
24:04
What do we do?
In
Out
24:10
Where do the funds come from?
In
Out
24:14
And what needs to be cut?
In
Out
24:18
The financial team and the department heads have been working for weeks to figure out the answer to those questions.
In
Out
24:25
We invited counselors in to get your ideas, and I'm grateful for those of you who participated in that process.
In
Out
24:34
As you look across the budget pie chart, there are a few places to go.
In
Out
24:39
In the biggest category, schools, we picked up approximately $3 million in savings by using the most conservative calculation of net school spending.
In
Out
24:49
We cannot reduce pension benefits, of course, as I said, nor can we reduce healthcare benefits without the assent of the unions in the absence of— and in the absence of the council adopting Sections 21 to 23.
In
Out
25:04
So the only way to save on those items is to reduce the number of employees slated to receive those benefits.
In
Out
25:11
To round out our picture, I just note one of the other items, and they're debt and assessments.
In
Out
25:16
I point out that mandatory assessments to the places like Bristol County and Greater New Bedford VoLTECH cannot be reduced because they are, well, mandatory.
In
Out
25:26
And of course, we are obligated to pay the debt down the bottom right-hand corner that the city has issued to build things like— to rebuild things like buildings and roads and other stuff that the city owns.
In
Out
25:38
I note that for a city of our size, we carry a very modest amount of debt.
In
Out
25:44
So the place that we have to make up this historically large budget gap is in the roughly 18% of the general fund budget that supports traditional municipal services.
In
Out
25:56
This is the part of the budget that funds the activities we most closely associate with municipal government— public safety, libraries, parks, street maintenance, and so forth.
In
Out
26:08
Given the size of the gap, we had to reject more than $8 million in service enhancements proposed by department heads.
In
Out
26:15
Nearly all of these items were worthwhile and would have been important to our residents, but right now we can't afford to expand services.
In
Out
26:25
Addressing the gap we face now and will continue to face beyond this year will require a whole lot more.
In
Out
26:35
We must raise more revenue and we must eliminate services.
In
Out
26:40
We would be calling on everyone to sacrifice, and unfortunately some more than others.
In
Out
26:47
On the revenue side, back to the revenue side of the equation, there is no avoid— avoiding raising the levy.
In
Out
26:52
None.
In
Out
26:54
Going into this year, we had a healthy balance of what is referred to as excess levy capacity.
In
Out
27:00
Which is the cumulative amount of taxing authority we do not use— we did not use in previous years.
In
Out
27:06
We will use all of it this year.
In
Out
27:11
We will need— and this will be an imposition on our residents at a time when many of them are struggling to pay their bills.
In
Out
27:20
Nevertheless, this additional revenue will close only about half of the gap.
In
Out
27:29
There's no getting around the fact that services must be reduced.
In
Out
27:34
I believe the council will agree that there's no low-hanging fruit here.
In
Out
27:38
No service we provide is frivolous.
In
Out
27:42
So we began by identifying which services can be eliminated or deferred to another year with modest disruption.
In
Out
27:51
And then there were a few that are relatively straightforward.
In
Out
27:54
There's a long list, but I'll give you a few examples.
In
Out
27:57
We will reduce the hours of operation across our library system.
In
Out
28:01
We will not renew our contract with ShotSpotter, the gunshot detection system, as we, as we shift to greater reliance on a fixed camera system.
In
Out
28:12
We will defer the start of the process to construct the new police headquarters on Cogswell Street.
In
Out
28:18
DPI will be cutting back on holiday decorations and support for public events.
In
Out
28:23
And the new trash contract, we will reduce the frequency of yard waste pickup.
In
Out
28:28
There are— there's a whole lot more, and the council will see the whole long list that touches every single department in city government.
In
Out
28:35
Unfortunately, all of these and many others don't add up to nearly enough because— and I'm pointing now to these 2 slices of the pie.
In
Out
28:46
That's 8— at 18% is the 30 or so departments in city government.
In
Out
28:52
In that, in that part of the budget, what we do operationally, that's where it is.
In
Out
28:58
Because 78% of the cost of city operations are personal salaries, there's no way to get to a balanced budget as legally required without eliminating positions.
In
Out
29:12
Not even close.
In
Out
29:15
Suffice it to say, balancing the budget by cutting positions is really difficult.
In
Out
29:21
City government is not overstaffed.
In
Out
29:24
We don't have positions to spare.
In
Out
29:28
In fact, the general fund supports nearly 100 fewer positions than it did in 2009.
In
Out
29:32
It's— it has been slimmed down.
In
Out
29:37
As the council also knows, our employees work hard and they work efficiently.
In
Out
29:44
I put them up against their counterparts in any city in America.
In
Out
29:49
The task is not as simple as eliminating vacant positions.
In
Out
29:56
Every position turns over at some point, and just because a position happens to be vacant during budget season doesn't mean that it is expendable.
In
Out
30:10
The question, rather, is what services can we most afford to reduce or to eliminate?
In
Out
30:19
These are difficult judgments, but it's our responsibility to make them.
In
Out
30:26
In general, the largest departments can absorb the largest service reductions.
In
Out
30:33
The 2 departments with the most employees supported by the general fund by far are the police and fire departments.
In
Out
30:42
Although we have been rebuilding the police department after years of declining ranks, we will need to tap the brakes on recruitment.
In
Out
30:52
We will end the signing bonus for new officers, and we will eliminate some 24 positions scheduled to be filled this year.
In
Out
31:00
The consequences will be that the ranks of the police department will not return to pre-pandemic levels as quickly as we had hoped.
In
Out
31:08
I am confident that with the reforms that are being implemented by Chief Thody, the department will continue to perform at a high level.
In
Out
31:17
In the fire department, we have run up against the hard fact that we provide a level of staffing well beyond that of other municipalities that has become extremely difficult to afford.
In
Out
31:33
As you can see from this table— from the slide, excuse me— New Bedford is one of 3 departments in Massachusetts that still staffs a minimum of 4 firefighters to an apparatus.
In
Out
31:48
The other 2 are Boston and Brookline, 2 municipalities whose tax bases per capita are far higher than New Bedford's.
In
Out
32:00
We can no longer afford a fire department that both runs 9 companies and staffs 4 firefighters per piece.
In
Out
32:10
In the absence of an agreement with the firefighters union to reduce manning per apparatus we will be forced to shut down a fire company.
In
Out
32:19
Although Chief Medeiros is understandably reluctant to close any company, closing Engine 9 on Ashley Boulevard would have the least impact on overall operations.
In
Out
32:32
Unfortunately, this will result in the laying off of recently hired firefighters at the beginning of the fiscal year.
In
Out
32:40
And even then, Still more reductions will be necessary in the non-public safety departments, this last sliver of pie here, which includes almost 30 departments, 9% of the budget.
In
Out
32:54
Because these departments are much smaller than the fire and police departments, the elimination of positions can disable the department entire— a department entirely from, from conducting in completing its mission.
In
Out
33:09
The way to achieve savings is to consolidate departments and then reduce services.
In
Out
33:17
Accordingly, we intend to merge Parks, Recreation, and Beaches— Parks, Recreation, Beaches, Community Services, Veterans Services, Licensing, and the Health Department to create a new entity called the Department of Health and Human Services, an agency that existed in essentially the same form about 20 years ago.
In
Out
33:38
We will also eliminate certain community services, including after-school programming.
In
Out
33:44
This unfortunately will result in layoffs in non-union personnel.
In
Out
33:49
All in all, the proposed budget will entail the reduction of 94 positions, including 36 layoffs.
In
Out
33:59
We have built a vacancy savings into the budget, as has been done in recent years, but because we've eliminated most of the vacant positions, only a modest vacancy savings can be achieved.
In
Out
34:14
In addition, I will file a proposal with the council suspending the cost of living adjustments and step increases in the coming year for Unit C management positions.
In
Out
34:24
This will slow the rate of increases in personnel costs for the coming fiscal year and beyond, but realistically, it's a measure we can only use once, or we risk losing still more people.
In
Out
34:38
There's no sugarcoating the personal impact of these decisions.
In
Out
34:44
Being laid off is jarring, not only for the recipients of pink slips, but their families as well.
In
Out
34:53
Many of those on the list have worked for the city for a long time.
In
Out
34:59
Some I consider to be personal friends.
In
Out
35:03
In all cases, they are committed public servants who care deeply about New Bedford.
In
Out
35:09
My pledge to them is that we will do everything we can to ease the inevitable disruption in their lives.
In
Out
35:17
But all of us should be clear about one thing: given the reality we face now, the steps we're taking to balance the budget are the responsible thing to do.
In
Out
35:30
We'd of course prefer not to be in this position, but we don't have to look hard to find examples of cities that have ignored their financial realities, the ones that decided kick the problem down the road.
In
Out
35:45
They might use rainy day funds to fill budget gaps with the false hope that they'll grow their way out of the problem, or they figure that the next occupants in their positions will be forced to fix it after it all finally comes home to roost.
In
Out
36:02
The result inevitably is a larger problem, and in many cases inexorable decline.
In
Out
36:11
We're not going to let that happen here in New Bedford.
In
Out
36:16
This city is better than that.
In
Out
36:21
It's no mystery what we have to do from here.
In
Out
36:24
We must get serious about dealing with healthcare and pension costs.
In
Out
36:29
On that front, I look forward to a discussion about reasonable steps that we can agree on to preserve employee benefits in a way that is affordable to taxpayers and balances the budget.
In
Out
36:41
At the top of the list is the adoption of municipal healthcare reforms and the deferring of the expansion of pension benefits.
In
Out
36:50
The unions must have a seat at the table, but they also must be willing to acknowledge that the financial stability of the city is in the long-term interest of their members.
In
Out
37:05
Each of us who has the privilege of serving in public office does so out of a love for the place and the people who live in it, and we owe them our best.
In
Out
37:21
Avoiding hard decisions is always the comfortable thing to do in the moment, and that's what makes them hard.
In
Out
37:33
Whenever we are done with our time in office, we want to be able to look ourselves in the mirror and say we made the city better off for our efforts, even when it wasn't easy.
In
Out
37:49
This is one of those times that demands our best.
In
Out
37:55
We know what to do, and I know that we have the resolve to do it.
In
Out
38:03
Thank you for listening, everyone, and I look forward to the work ahead.
In
Out
38:07
Thank you.
In
Out
38:22
Without objection, at this time I will ask the clerk to read items 2 through 9 together.
In
Out
38:35
I'll ask the clerk to read the orders, please.
In
Out
38:38
Mr. President, item 2 is an order appropriating $493,130,000 $39,486 from ordinary revenue and municipal receipts of FY beginning July 1st, 2026 and ending June 30th, 2027 for the payment of current expenses of various municipal departments.
In
Out
38:56
Item 3 is an order appropriating $1,408,557 in 12 equal monthly increments from airport receipts of FY27 in the airport budget.
In
Out
39:07
Item 4 is order appropriating $133,747 from the hotel and lodging tax and the Arts, Culture, and Tourism Fund in 12 equal monthly increments from FY27 municipal receipts.
In
Out
39:21
Item 5 is an order appropriating $1,492,045 in 12 equal monthly increments from enterprise fund receipts of FY27 and the Cable Access Enterprise Fund.
In
Out
39:35
Item 6 is an order appropriating $68,500 now standing to the credit of the account of CCDA Traffic Handicap Parking as follows: $64,000 to Commission for Citizens with Disabilities purchase of services and $4,500 to the Commission for Citizens with Disabilities and supplies.
In
Out
39:53
Item 7 is an order appropriating $1,124,735 in 12 equal monthly increments from the Enterprise Fund receipts in FY27 in the downtown parking account.
In
Out
40:06
Item 8 is an order appropriating $33,789,652 in 12 equal monthly increments from wastewater receipts in FY27 in the DPI wastewater budget.
In
Out
40:19
Item 9, Mr. President, is an order appropriating $23,234,872 in 12 equal monthly increments from water receipts of FY27 in the DPI water budget.
In
Out
40:31
Motion to receive and place on file orders 2 through 9 and refer them to the Quasi-Committee of the Whole.
In
Out
40:37
Second.
In
Out
40:38
Motion to refer the Quasi-Committee of the Whole made by Councilor Oliver, seconded by Councilor, uh, Burgo.
In
Out
40:45
On the question, the chair recognizes Councilor Burgo.
In
Out
40:51
Thank you, Mr. President.
In
Out
40:53
Excuse me, I'm sorry, Mr. Councilor.
In
Out
40:55
The chair would like to recognize that we were joined by Councilor Shokat a while ago.
In
Out
40:58
Thank you.
In
Out
41:00
As we're referring these budget items to the quasi-Committee of the Whole, I know it's not customary that we speak, but it's just appalling, that presentation that we received, the hypocrisy that we saw as the mayor's scurried away, as he typically does during these budget hearings.
In
Out
41:20
You had department heads that were notified today that they were laid off after preparing a budget and wasted their time.
In
Out
41:31
We should only pay for what we need was the quote that he very cutely said about the Liberty Mutual commercial that he always adds into his budget line, some kind of cute commercial.
In
Out
41:40
There's nothing cute about what we're facing right now.
In
Out
41:44
He talks about the school budget and the cut that he faced.
In
Out
41:49
He only talked about a $3 million cut, but really it was a $4.5 million reduction in the school budget.
In
Out
41:56
And I want to make sure people got that, because last year he did the same thing, and Jonathan Darling that's here lied to people and told you they didn't make that cut last year, and they did.
In
Out
42:08
And they did it again this year.
In
Out
42:10
And the best part of it, he wasn't there on Monday night when our elected school body voted on that budget.
In
Out
42:20
He sent forward these cuts.
In
Out
42:22
And he talks about— and I want to get this right— discussions on reasonable steps forwards and a seat at the table.
In
Out
42:31
All fallacies.
In
Out
42:33
Because our unions and other people, yes, they want to have these discussions.
In
Out
42:38
And he talks about the current mechanisms we have now gives the unions a veto.
In
Out
42:44
No, he wants to be the only one in the room that has a veto.
In
Out
42:47
We are all willing to have discussions— union members, the school committee, the city council, the state delegation, everyone— and he is the only one who refuses refuses to make any concessions, and this is why we're in the situation that we are in.
In
Out
43:05
And I hate to raise my voice because all that will be written is Councilor Burgos is angry and he's furious, and I am.
In
Out
43:12
I'm pissed off because these presentations are bullshit.
In
Out
43:16
These binders that we're getting— Councilor Burgos, excuse me one second.
In
Out
43:38
If we could just refrain from comments from the gallery, please, applause and everything, until after our meeting, where there was no applause or commentary during debate.
In
Out
43:47
Thank you.
In
Out
43:48
We're only now about to receive the binders, and I want the general public to understand, as elected officials, as your city council representation, We are just now getting this budget.
In
Out
43:58
We are just now learning, just like all of you, about Engine 9.
In
Out
44:02
I know there was speculation about it, but not only is Engine 9 closing, but the firefighters that work there are being laid off.
In
Out
44:09
And they obviously put up, oh, the survey of 1 in 3 firefighters— excuse me, 1 in 3 cities and only 3 firefighters per ladder.
In
Out
44:18
What about those other towns?
In
Out
44:20
What are the death rates there?
In
Out
44:22
What is the makeup of those areas?
In
Out
44:24
We want more data on that.
In
Out
44:25
You can give us just the favorable statistics, but what more?
In
Out
44:30
It's unfathomable to have these presentations where there's no accountability.
In
Out
44:37
Sure, there's some blame to go around, but none when it comes to the coroner office.
In
Out
44:41
So I, again, I apologize.
In
Out
44:42
I know typically we just send this to the quasi-committee of the whole and we have our discussions, but it's important That we have on the record the cuts that the mayor makes to the school department without any collaboration with them, without any reasonable steps and discussions that he's asking us to have, without any public comment, and the fact that all these people that are being laid off just finding out now.
In
Out
45:05
It's unacceptable.
In
Out
45:06
It's not the way to run government, and I'm disgusted by it.
In
Out
45:09
Thank you.
In
Out
45:11
Thank you.
In
Out
45:15
Thank you.
In
Out
45:15
Thank you.
In
Out
45:16
Anyone else on the question?
In
Out
45:18
The chair recognizes Councilor Gomes.
In
Out
45:22
Thank you very much, Mr. President.
In
Out
45:24
I've been here a long time.
In
Out
45:27
This is a first.
In
Out
45:30
Let me first say, you wouldn't jeopardize the public safety of this city by laying any firefighter off, shutting down any firehouse, taking any police officer off the street, you got to be out of your comp— I can't say it, not publicly.
In
Out
45:47
You got to be out of your mind.
In
Out
45:49
You got to be out of your mind.
In
Out
45:50
The question that we must ask this evening is, how did we get to this point?
In
Out
45:55
How did we get to this point?
In
Out
45:58
My administration, I would have known when we were $250,000 in the hole, because that's how you're supposed to run the place.
In
Out
46:07
$13 million, blaming it on state aid.
In
Out
46:11
Where you been?
In
Out
46:13
Why haven't you been fighting in Washington for the mandates?
In
Out
46:16
Why haven't you gone and see your friend Maura Healey and tell her what kind of situation the city of New Bedford's in and that we need the help?
In
Out
46:25
Maybe stop spending billions of dollars other places that don't immediately affect the people of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts or this city.
In
Out
46:35
You.
In
Out
46:37
I'm not going to take any blame for none of that.
In
Out
46:41
You can make that circle, and that's why some of you have met.
In
Out
46:44
And I'm one of those that did not meet with the mayor.
In
Out
46:46
And I did not meet with the mayor for the simple reason, in 16 years, he never wanted to meet with anybody on the city council when it came to the budget.
In
Out
46:53
Now all of a sudden he wants to meet with the council because he's tying you in.
In
Out
46:57
He's tying you in on all the BS.
In
Out
47:01
How did we get to this point?
In
Out
47:04
He'll tell you that it's about the pensions.
In
Out
47:05
He'll tell you it's about this, it's about that.
In
Out
47:10
You didn't— you see this coming?
In
Out
47:11
Didn't you see this in the healthcare coming?
In
Out
47:14
You put up on the screen New Bedford and the surrounding towns.
In
Out
47:19
You didn't put the cities, the surrounding towns.
In
Out
47:22
Totally different budget, totally different pay.
In
Out
47:25
Totally different healthcare system, the whole bit.
In
Out
47:29
Flowers and nice garden to throw at us.
In
Out
47:34
We're in a situation and we must get out of it.
In
Out
47:38
But you know what?
In
Out
47:40
Like I said earlier, the mayor has had plenty of time.
In
Out
47:44
And I've called it in this room.
In
Out
47:47
Go to Boston.
In
Out
47:49
We're not taking pictures today.
In
Out
47:51
I'm here because my city's in trouble.
In
Out
47:53
Go to Washington.
In
Out
47:54
My city's in trouble.
In
Out
47:55
You've heard me ask department heads here.
In
Out
47:58
And I've gotten a line, once a— yeah, we're doing that.
In
Out
48:02
I don't see any recovery.
In
Out
48:04
I don't see them coming down handing us the check.
In
Out
48:10
We've been getting our butt kicks around here and somebody's been BSing us.
In
Out
48:14
Don't let it continue.
In
Out
48:16
I will fight tooth and nail for our public servants.
In
Out
48:21
I am sorry tonight to hear what I've heard, which was rumor.
In
Out
48:25
We wanted to get the facts and we got it tonight.
In
Out
48:29
Don't try to close Station 9, sir.
In
Out
48:32
You're jeopardizing this city.
In
Out
48:34
You take these men and women off them engines, you're jeopardizing this city.
In
Out
48:39
Maybe you don't understand, but I've been around for a while and I understand it and I pay attention to it.
In
Out
48:46
So you pictured Engine 9 saving somebody on Ohio Street who has just had a heart attack.
In
Out
48:51
Not far from there, huh?
In
Out
48:52
You take that away, where's the next engine coming from?
In
Out
48:56
Where's the next emergency vehicles coming from?
In
Out
48:59
We have a major fire, and we've had some, whether they're small kitchen fires, whether it's carbon monoxide in the house, whether it's a spill, whether it's one of our fish plants, whether it's one one of our industries, what are you going to do?
In
Out
49:14
What are you going to do?
In
Out
49:18
I don't have time to wait for mutual aid.
In
Out
49:20
I need my people out there, our people, our firefighters, our police, our EMS.
In
Out
49:28
Mayor, I understand what you've said tonight, but I also understand that what you're doing is wrong.
In
Out
49:35
And why it's wrong?
In
Out
49:37
Is because you're going to hurt a lot of people and you're going to hurt the city, and it's going to come back to get you.
In
Out
49:42
And you've heard me use the term Russian roulette in this place.
In
Out
49:45
We're playing it again.
In
Out
49:47
He's playing that game, and you're playing it with the people.
In
Out
49:49
You're playing it with the firefighters.
In
Out
49:51
You're playing it with the people of the city.
In
Out
49:53
This is not a good thing.
In
Out
49:55
This is not a good thing.
In
Out
49:57
Get off your ass, get to Washington, get to Boston, and do the job that you're supposed to be doing.
In
Out
50:03
You're the administrator.
In
Out
50:04
And again, ladies and gentlemen, how did we get to this point and nobody caught it?
In
Out
50:09
Nobody was saying anything about it.
In
Out
50:11
You can hum about this healthcare, you can hum about all of that.
In
Out
50:13
Think about what I have said here tonight.
In
Out
50:17
Didn't Fall River, by the way, get money from governor to make sure that all them engines were manned, huh?
In
Out
50:25
Because they were running short.
In
Out
50:26
We didn't see that up on the screen tonight, did we?
In
Out
50:29
We didn't hear about that.
In
Out
50:32
Again, I'll fight tooth and nail for our public servants, the people who not represent this city, the public servants of this city who are in jeopardy right now, who are in trouble.
In
Out
50:43
I will stand up for them.
In
Out
50:45
I will stand for our firefighters.
In
Out
50:47
Don't close them station.
In
Out
50:48
Don't close that station.
In
Out
50:49
Don't take these people away.
In
Out
50:51
We've already been here.
In
Out
50:52
We know what the consequences can be.
In
Out
50:54
To be.
In
Out
50:55
I thank you for allowing me the time.
In
Out
50:57
I have a great love for this city of New Bedford.
In
Out
50:59
I'm not here because it's the thing to do.
In
Out
51:02
I'm here because I love what I do.
In
Out
51:04
And this is one night that I'm not accepting, and I'm not taking the blame for.
In
Out
51:09
The administration has to take the blame on this one and hold other people accountable, from Washington to Boston, whomever.
In
Out
51:17
Thanks for the opportunity.
In
Out
51:19
Thank you, Councilor.
In
Out
51:32
Thank you, thank you.
In
Out
51:34
Uh, anyone else on the question?
In
Out
51:37
Seeing none, all those in favor of referral to the Quasi-Committee of the Whole say aye.
In
Out
51:42
Opposed?
In
Out
51:42
The ayes have it.
In
Out
51:44
Seeing no further business business before us.
In
Out
51:46
Motion to adjourn.
In
Out
51:46
Motion to adjourn has been made by Councillor Burgos, seconded by Councillor Roy.
In
Out
51:51
All those, uh, anyone on the question?
In
Out
51:53
All those in favor say aye.
In
Out
51:54
Opposed?
In
Out
51:55
The ayes have it.
In
Out
51:58
We are adjourned at 7:55 PM.
In
Out