City of New Bedford Meetings
Search and subscribe to city meeting topics that impact you
Newsletters
Subscribe
← Back to video
Special Committee on Special Permits and Licensing — March 19, 2026
−
Fit
+
IN
0:00
OUT
0:00
Length
0:00
▶ Play selection
Export clip
Keyboard:
I
set in,
O
set out,
←
/
→
nudge playhead 5s.
0:00
You got hiccups, Gus?
In
Out
0:02
Sorry?
In
Out
0:03
You got hiccups?
In
Out
0:09
Yes.
In
Out
4:43
All right, we're going to get started.
In
Out
4:45
Okay, so here we go.
In
Out
4:48
Good evening, ladies and gentlemen.
In
Out
4:50
It is 6:34 PM on Thursday, March 19th, 2026.
In
Out
4:55
I'd like to call to order this special committee meeting on special permits and licensing here in the New Bedford City Council Chambers.
In
Out
5:04
Note, this meeting is being live streamed and recorded.
In
Out
5:08
City Council and committee meetings can be viewed on the City of New Bedford's homepage under Quick Links, then Meetings.
In
Out
5:16
I am joined in the council chambers by my committee members.
In
Out
5:19
On this committee, we have Ward 2 Councilor Scott Pemberton, and we have Ward 1 Councilor Leo Choquette.
In
Out
5:26
And I am Ian Abreu, Councilor at Large and the chairman of this committee.
In
Out
5:30
I will ask the clerk, are there any letters to be read into the record at this time?
In
Out
5:33
Chairman Abreu, yes, we have 2.
In
Out
5:35
The first one is, um, I'm writing to inform you that I will be unable to attend tonight's Committee on Special Permits and Licensing due to a personal matter.
In
Out
5:43
Please read the letter into the record to make my colleagues and the public aware of the reasons for my absence.
In
Out
5:48
Sincerely, Naomi R. Carney, Councilor at Large.
In
Out
5:51
The other one is from Councilor Lopes.
In
Out
5:54
It says, I'm writing to inform you that I will be unable to attend tonight's committee meeting due to a work commitment.
In
Out
5:59
Please read the letter into the record to make my colleagues and the public aware of the reasons for my absence.
In
Out
6:03
Sincerely, Joseph P. Lopes.
In
Out
6:05
I need a motion to receive these 2 letters on file.
In
Out
6:08
Receive on file the letters made by Councilor Kempson.
In
Out
6:13
By Councilor Choquette.
In
Out
6:14
Anyone on the question?
In
Out
6:16
All those in favor say aye.
In
Out
6:17
Opposed?
In
Out
6:18
The ayes have it.
In
Out
6:19
I will ask the clerk to read item number 1 that's before us, a public hearing.
In
Out
6:22
Item 1, public hearing on an application.
In
Out
6:25
Moses Kimball, doing business as K&D Auto Rentals LLC, for a special permit for motor vehicle sales and rentals at 297 Belleville Ave, New Bedford, Mass.
In
Out
6:35
02747.
In
Out
6:37
The application received on February 19th, 2026, and it was advertised in the Standard Times on Thursday, March 5th, and Thursday, March 12th.
In
Out
6:45
I need a motion to receive and place this item on file.
In
Out
6:50
Made by Councilor Choquette.
In
Out
6:51
Seconded by Councilor Pemberton.
In
Out
6:53
Anyone on the question?
In
Out
6:54
All those in favor say aye.
In
Out
6:55
Opposed?
In
Out
6:56
The ayes have it.
In
Out
6:56
I also need a motion to open the public hearing at this time.
In
Out
7:00
Made by Councillor Chauquette.
In
Out
7:02
Seconded by Councillor Pemberton.
In
Out
7:04
Anyone on the question of opening the public hearing?
In
Out
7:06
All those in favor say aye.
In
Out
7:08
Opposed?
In
Out
7:09
The ayes have it.
In
Out
7:09
Mr. Kasembo, would you mind taking the podium?
In
Out
7:19
Good evening, sir.
In
Out
7:21
Thank you for joining us this evening.
In
Out
7:24
Would you mind telling us a little bit about your project, and then I'll, I'll open it for questions from the body at that point.
In
Out
7:31
Good evening, all.
In
Out
7:32
My name is Moses Kisembo, the owner of K&D Auto Rentals.
In
Out
7:37
I'm applying for a motor vehicle special permit and a business certificate to start a car rental company.
In
Out
7:48
I've been working with Turo Car Rental— Pick up the microphone, sir, a little bit.
In
Out
7:53
Thank you.
In
Out
7:54
Can I start over?
In
Out
7:56
You can start wherever point you'd like, sir.
In
Out
7:57
Yes, please.
In
Out
7:58
All right.
In
Out
7:59
I'm applying for motor vehicle special permit and business certificate to start a car rental company.
In
Out
8:06
I've been working with Turo Rental Company for close to 5 years, and I would like to start my own now.
In
Out
8:17
I leased a small property for 9 vehicles at 297 Boulevard Avenue.
In
Out
8:24
To start my business there upon my application approval.
In
Out
8:28
I'll be very happy if my application is approved so I can start serving New Bedford.
In
Out
8:33
Thank you.
In
Out
8:34
Thank you very much, sir.
In
Out
8:35
I'll open it up at this time.
In
Out
8:36
Any questions for the applicant?
In
Out
8:38
The chair will recognize the Ward 2 Councilor Scott Pemberton, for which this would be in your ward.
In
Out
8:42
So, Mr. Pemberton, you have the floor.
In
Out
8:44
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
In
Out
8:46
Uh, thank you for being here.
In
Out
8:48
Uh, I just wanted— how many vehicles do you plan on having on the lot to be able to rent?
In
Out
8:53
I'm going to start with 9 and see how things progress from there.
In
Out
8:57
Then I'll see what to do, or increase, or lease a new place.
In
Out
9:02
I'm just starting out.
In
Out
9:04
Okay.
In
Out
9:05
And your hours of operation that you're looking at?
In
Out
9:08
The hours of operation that you want to— 8 to 5.
In
Out
9:14
8 to 5?
In
Out
9:14
Yes.
In
Out
9:16
Okay.
In
Out
9:19
Actually, I have a question for the commissioner.
In
Out
9:21
All right, we'll call him up once we've exhausted questions from Mr. Casembo.
In
Out
9:24
Do you have anything else for Mr. Casembo at this time?
In
Out
9:26
No, while he's here, you'll yield.
In
Out
9:28
Okay, Councilor Choquette, the chair recognizes you.
In
Out
9:31
Good evening, Mr. Casembo.
In
Out
9:32
Thank you for coming in.
In
Out
9:33
Um, quick question, is this your first time running a business, or have you ever owned businesses in the past?
In
Out
9:39
Or— I've run a business online, but now I would like to like to open up like a location, a physical business.
In
Out
9:47
Sure.
In
Out
9:48
Okay, great.
In
Out
9:49
Um, so it's pretty obvious nature of the business, and Councillor, um, Councillor Pemberton asked some questions about, you know, logistics and everything.
In
Out
10:00
Are you going to be a solo owner, or are you in partnership, or how's the business structure?
In
Out
10:07
I have my brother that I would like to start with.
In
Out
10:11
So we can do 2 shifts or do a few days half and a few days for him.
In
Out
10:19
But we've been both back in Boston before we came here.
In
Out
10:24
We've been renting cars on Turo platform.
In
Out
10:27
We're really familiar with the business, close to 5 years now.
In
Out
10:33
Okay.
In
Out
10:33
Yeah, just pretty basic.
In
Out
10:35
You know, just trying to get to know the nature of everything.
In
Out
10:38
So I thank you.
In
Out
10:39
Thank you, sir.
In
Out
10:40
Thank you, sir.
In
Out
10:40
Thank you very much, sir.
In
Out
10:41
I yield.
In
Out
10:42
Thank you.
In
Out
10:43
Um, we do have 2 of our colleagues here who aren't members of this committee.
In
Out
10:47
They cannot vote on items, but they can ask questions.
In
Out
10:50
So we do have Councilor Oliver and Councilor Gomes here.
In
Out
10:53
Councilor Gomes, Councilor Oliver, do either one of you have questions for this petitioner before I send him to his seat?
In
Out
10:58
No, not at this time.
In
Out
10:59
Councilor Gomes, you have a question?
In
Out
11:00
No?
In
Out
11:00
Okay.
In
Out
11:01
Mr. Casembo, if you wouldn't mind just stepping to the side, we'll call up Commissioner Romanowicz.
In
Out
11:06
Thank you.
In
Out
11:06
Thank you.
In
Out
11:15
Hi, Danny.
In
Out
11:17
Hi.
In
Out
11:18
So if you want to give us the rundown, is this all on the up and up?
In
Out
11:20
We're looking good here.
In
Out
11:21
What's your report?
In
Out
11:23
Yeah, the, um, it's one of the better, uh, car lots on, on Belleville Avenue.
In
Out
11:28
It's always kept nice and neat.
In
Out
11:30
I assume he's going to do the same thing.
In
Out
11:34
Um, he can only fit 9 cars.
In
Out
11:36
There will not be an increase because it's landlocked.
In
Out
11:39
Yeah, that's what his application says, right?
In
Out
11:41
Yeah, so that's what it has to be, 9 cars.
In
Out
11:45
Thank you, sir.
In
Out
11:45
Any questions for the commissioner while we have him?
In
Out
11:47
Yes, Councilor Pemberton.
In
Out
11:48
Yeah, well, he just basically answered, you know, my question.
In
Out
11:51
Uh, I just want to make sure he was all ready to go, uh, and if he was allowed to have any more than 9, but just 9 is the limit and that's it.
In
Out
11:58
No.
In
Out
11:59
Okay, very good.
In
Out
12:00
All right, okay, thank you.
In
Out
12:02
All set, Councilor?
In
Out
12:02
Thank you.
In
Out
12:03
Yes, thank you, Mr. Chairman.
In
Out
12:04
Councilor Choquette, anything?
In
Out
12:06
I was just going to say, if Commissioner Romanowicz is good with it, then yeah, well, I'm good.
In
Out
12:10
All right, thank you.
In
Out
12:12
Now that the 2 committee members have asked questions, do either of the other councilors who went on the committee have questions while you're here?
In
Out
12:18
Okay.
In
Out
12:18
All right, Danny, you're all set.
In
Out
12:21
Any other questions for Danny or Mr. Casembo?
In
Out
12:25
No?
In
Out
12:25
Okay.
In
Out
12:26
Remember, this is a public hearing, so at this time I am going to ask if there are any folks here from the general public who are here looking to speak in favor of this petition.
In
Out
12:37
Speak in favor of this petition.
In
Out
12:40
Be recorded in favor.
In
Out
12:42
Be recorded in favor.
In
Out
12:45
Is there anyone here looking to speak in opposition?
In
Out
12:47
Speak in opposition.
In
Out
12:50
Be recorded in opposition.
In
Out
12:52
Be recorded in opposition.
In
Out
12:55
Okay, seeing none, the chair will entertain a motion to close the public hearing at this time.
In
Out
13:00
I'd like to make a motion to close.
In
Out
13:03
Made by Councilor Pemberton, second by Councilor Choquette.
In
Out
13:06
Anyone on the question of closing the public hearing?
In
Out
13:09
All those in favor say aye.
In
Out
13:10
Aye.
In
Out
13:11
Opposed?
In
Out
13:12
The ayes have it.
In
Out
13:12
Councilor, it's your pleasure.
In
Out
13:16
It would be a motion to refer out for a positive recommendation.
In
Out
13:19
Yeah, I'd like to make a motion to refer positive For approval.
In
Out
13:23
For approval to the full city council.
In
Out
13:26
Made by Councilor Pemberton, seconded by Councilor Choquette.
In
Out
13:29
Any— for approval?
In
Out
13:33
Yes.
In
Out
13:34
So second made by Councilor Pemberton, seconded by Councilor Choquette.
In
Out
13:38
Anyone on the question?
In
Out
13:40
All those in favor say aye.
In
Out
13:42
Opposed?
In
Out
13:42
The ayes have it.
In
Out
13:43
Okay, Mr. Casembo, you have received a positive recommendation from the Special Committee on Permits and Licensing So now what will happen, this will now go to a final vote on Thursday, March 26th, right here at 7 PM.
In
Out
13:55
So next Thursday here in the New Bedford City Council chamber, it'll be our full city council, all 11 of us.
In
Out
14:01
We will take a final vote for approval.
In
Out
14:03
But usually if you get a positive recommendation from the committee, the council will follow suit.
In
Out
14:09
So, but I would be here anyway just in case.
In
Out
14:11
All right, you can come back next Thursday right here in this room.
In
Out
14:15
3/26, March 26th at 7 PM.
In
Out
14:18
Okay, you're all set.
In
Out
14:20
Thank you.
In
Out
14:20
Congratulations and best of luck.
In
Out
14:22
I'll ask the clerk to read item 2 at this time.
In
Out
14:25
Item 2 is written motion.
In
Out
14:26
Councilors Abreu and Oliver requesting that the city council engage the appropriate city department heads to explore the feasibility of permitting a host community agreement for on-site cannabis consumption establishments, commonly referred to as cannabis consumption lounges or social consumption establishments in accordance with the Massachusetts Laws and Cannabis Control Commission regulations adopted in 2025, and further requesting that said departments report back to the City Council with findings, recommendations, and any necessary local actions required to lawfully implement such establishments within the city of New Bedford.
In
Out
15:03
Motion received and placed this item on file.
In
Out
15:07
Made by Councilor Choquette.
In
Out
15:09
Second.
In
Out
15:09
Second by Councilor Pemberton.
In
Out
15:10
Anyone on the question?
In
Out
15:11
All those in favor say aye.
In
Out
15:14
Opposed?
In
Out
15:14
The ayes have it.
In
Out
15:17
Um, it was my motion with Councilor Oliver.
In
Out
15:18
I know he's not on the committee, but I know he is here to ask questions.
In
Out
15:22
Before I ask any questions from the chair, I'll defer to the committee members.
In
Out
15:25
Either one of you have a question for any of our guests before we get started here?
In
Out
15:30
Not at this time, Mr. Chairman.
In
Out
15:32
No, not at this time.
In
Out
15:34
All right, I guess we'll kick this off with Health Director Sloan.
In
Out
15:43
Good evening.
In
Out
15:44
Good evening.
In
Out
15:44
How are you?
In
Out
15:45
Good.
In
Out
15:45
How are you?
In
Out
15:45
Good.
In
Out
15:46
So obviously, you know the motion.
In
Out
15:48
I'm sure you've done some homework.
In
Out
15:49
I know you brought some help from your office and some staff here.
In
Out
15:54
What are your thoughts?
In
Out
15:55
Where are we at?
In
Out
15:56
And we'll have a conversation and we'll go from there.
In
Out
16:00
Sure.
In
Out
16:00
So we have been like like you said, doing our homework.
In
Out
16:07
There have been some— we've been reaching out to some public health professionals to see, you know, what other communities are thinking about passing this, as well as how the regulations are being interpreted.
In
Out
16:25
As of right now, I feel like it's still very early days and we don't have all the information In terms of how the CCC is actually going to regulate this, what the training is going to look like.
In
Out
16:39
From a health perspective, definitely have some concerns.
In
Out
16:44
The chief will probably go into this, but there's no field sobriety test for intoxication.
In
Out
16:53
So I find it difficult for the CCC to tell staff that they need to be able to, be able to check for impairment when there actually is no field sobriety test.
In
Out
17:08
Also have concerns around the normalization.
In
Out
17:14
It's one thing for something to be legal and for us to allow people to buy and consume cannabis.
In
Out
17:22
It's another thing for us to provide the infrastructure in our city for these types of gatherings to occur.
In
Out
17:32
I also think just when you get right there, the 3 types of licenses you can get, the supplemental, the hospitality, and the event organizer, I think some might be more cut and dry in terms of regulation than others.
In
Out
17:51
Um, the hospitality, I feel like, potential— has the potential to get messy in terms of keeping track of everything and compliance.
In
Out
18:01
Um, I'll pause there.
In
Out
18:05
Thank you.
In
Out
18:05
I mean, if, if my colleagues will allow, is that okay with you?
In
Out
18:10
There's a couple of questions.
In
Out
18:11
Um, you know, and I'm not gonna speak for Councilor Oliver, my co-sponsor on this.
In
Out
18:16
I know he's here to ask some questions.
In
Out
18:18
I'll recognize him Um, when appropriate.
In
Out
18:20
Um, I just don't want to see happen— and I hear everything you're saying, and, you know, as you know, I have a young one, you know, just like you do.
In
Out
18:29
You know what, we have children.
In
Out
18:30
So public health, safety, and wellness trumps all, and I'm on the record for that.
In
Out
18:35
And I said on the council floor a few weeks ago when I filed this motion, I just— from an economic standpoint, from a tourism standpoint, from a job creation workforce standpoint I just don't want us to— I don't want to see— I just don't want to have happen here what happened a few years ago with the cannabis dispensary industry when it really hit the fan and it really exploded.
In
Out
19:00
And you had Brockton and Fall River and other pocketed communities all throughout the South Coast, Wareham, all getting ahead of us and getting those host agreement dollars and getting those jobs created.
In
Out
19:12
By the time we We passed our ordinance and did our thing, and I know it very well.
In
Out
19:16
I was the chairman of the cannabis committee here for the city at that time on the city council.
In
Out
19:21
We got the ordinance done, we got some host agreements done, but we were a little late to the game.
In
Out
19:25
And I just don't want to see that happen again.
In
Out
19:27
You know what I'm saying?
In
Out
19:28
That's my opinion.
In
Out
19:30
And that's just my view.
In
Out
19:32
You don't have to answer that if you don't want to.
In
Out
19:34
I don't think you have to.
In
Out
19:35
But I just, I don't want to see us behind the 8-ball again on that economic driver because these other cities are going to be way more progressive than us, and we're going to be falling back again.
In
Out
19:45
That's just my view.
In
Out
19:47
I know you have to look at it from a different scope, and I respect that.
In
Out
19:52
Um, my question, and then I'll defer it to Councilor Oliver, but I mean, when we talk about intoxication— and this could be a question for the chief too, but I'll ask it in general— I mean, How is this any different than the bars and pubs we have all over New Bedford where people can drive drunk and we run that risk every day, don't we?
In
Out
20:14
How is it any different?
In
Out
20:17
I mean, Chief can talk about this more from a police standpoint, right, with there actually being field sobriety tests for alcohol to make, you know, that enforcement once people leave a little bit easier.
In
Out
20:33
I think, you know, when it comes to alcohol and drunk driving, that infrastructure, you know, bars exist.
In
Out
20:44
I don't know that we need to create another venue for a different type of intoxication if we can prevent it.
In
Out
20:54
Right.
In
Out
20:54
There's a lot of— I think right now a lot of risks, public health risks and safety risks around adopting this at this point.
In
Out
21:03
And I just— I don't think they outweigh what we're gonna get, what the city is gonna get in economic benefit.
In
Out
21:14
All right, thank you, Stephanie.
In
Out
21:17
I have other questions, but I'll hold for now.
In
Out
21:19
Now, first, the members of the committee, do you have any questions for Ms. Sloan while she's up here?
In
Out
21:23
I've got to go to the committee members first.
In
Out
21:26
No?
In
Out
21:27
Councillor Oliver, I know you have some questions, so fire away.
In
Out
21:30
Uh, thank you, Mr.
In
Out
21:31
Chair, and to the members of this committee for allowing me to, to attend and speak.
In
Out
21:37
Um, Stephanie, thank you, um, uh, for, for being here.
In
Out
21:41
We had a brief discussion about this, uh, a while back, and, uh, I had alluded that probably something was going to be coming, and, uh, here it is.
In
Out
21:50
But I think we at least have to have the conversation because, uh, folks are going to start asking as this is, you know, starts to come to fruition throughout the Commonwealth.
In
Out
21:59
And I too share the sentiments from my colleague who just spoke about, you know, kind of missing the opportunity here or being late to the, to the game.
In
Out
22:13
The fact of the matter is, is that this is going to happen and it's probably going to happen all around us.
In
Out
22:19
And if we don't do something, even if it's by limiting how many of these places, if we were to have them, I think we're going to be absolutely missing out.
In
Out
22:31
So I don't share in the same view that you have with that, that the benefit, the economic benefit, is— it doesn't outweigh— I understand you're looking at it as a— from a different scope.
In
Out
22:48
But as these things come to fruition, is there a— is there— so basically what we're hearing is there's no appetite, at least from the Board of Health standpoint, to have something like this in the city of New Bedford.
In
Out
23:02
Is that correct?
In
Out
23:02
Correct.
In
Out
23:03
Okay.
In
Out
23:04
Do you know if there's any appetite from the administration about having something like this?
In
Out
23:08
Have you spoken to any members of the administration aside from folks in your Um, that you oversee?
In
Out
23:14
I have not.
In
Out
23:15
Okay.
In
Out
23:16
Um, we— how many, uh, cannabis dispensaries do we have in the city of New Bedford right now?
In
Out
23:22
It's 3, right, Megan?
In
Out
23:25
3.
In
Out
23:26
3.
In
Out
23:27
Um, and one grow facility.
In
Out
23:29
One grow.
In
Out
23:29
And one— yeah, yeah.
In
Out
23:31
Um, and one in the pipeline, hopefully.
In
Out
23:33
Um, so we're already providing the product, correct?
In
Out
23:38
And the vessels are here already because people are consuming it in the privacy of their home already and however they're consuming it.
In
Out
23:45
Because if they're buying it, they're consuming it.
In
Out
23:47
Sure.
In
Out
23:48
So the problem therein lies, I don't see the— just because there's one or two places where it's socially acceptable to smoke or to partake in this, that it's going to change dramatically because people are still buying the product and they're still consuming the product.
In
Out
24:15
So I don't, I don't see how that connection is because there's a storefront now where you can do it is going to have this absorbent effect or ripple effect throughout the city of people driving intoxicated.
In
Out
24:31
Those folks are most likely doing that right now as we are in this room because they are— those items are available for purchase in the city of New Bedford.
In
Out
24:43
What are the major concerns from the Board of Health standpoint as to why the Board of Health is not on board with this type of establishment?
In
Out
24:57
So like I mentioned earlier, there is that public safety risk of, you know, an establishment lets out at a certain time, we have a bunch of people who are leaving establishment.
In
Out
25:11
The CCC requires rideshare, some sort of protocol, but there's no way that the store or the establishment can make sure that people are actually taking a rideshare.
In
Out
25:27
So I could say I'm walking out and getting an Uber.
In
Out
25:30
I could get in my car and drive away.
In
Out
25:31
So from a public health perspective, right, we want to reduce injury.
In
Out
25:36
And so that public safety piece is one concern.
In
Out
25:40
My other large concern is the normalization.
In
Out
25:45
So the more something is normalized, the higher frequency people will utilize it and the perception of less risk.
In
Out
25:54
So, you know, like I said, just because something's legal doesn't mean that we need to provide the infrastructure for that activity to occur.
In
Out
26:08
Okay.
In
Out
26:09
Has— is there expected to be more guidance from the CCC when it comes to this, or is it just they've put this out and it's for the individual municipalities to figure out?
In
Out
26:22
I believe there's more guidance coming out.
In
Out
26:26
We had a call with Cheryl Sabara, who's one of the legal TAs for MHAB.
In
Out
26:37
And she is on a number of working groups.
In
Out
26:41
So she's on the working group for the vendor training.
In
Out
26:44
That hasn't been sorted out yet.
In
Out
26:47
They don't know exactly what that looks like or what the requirements are going to be around that.
In
Out
26:52
So some of this stuff hasn't been totally worked out yet.
In
Out
26:54
Okay.
In
Out
26:56
And you had alluded to— excuse me.
In
Out
27:00
You had alluded to that you were doing a little bit of networking to see if other— what the appetite was in other communities or what other communities are thinking of doing or at least what the conversations are.
In
Out
27:12
In some communities that are similar to New Bedford.
In
Out
27:16
Could you share some of the oversight— I mean, the overview of what you've gathered from that?
In
Out
27:24
Yeah.
In
Out
27:24
So we— I actually have a call later in the week where we come together as the large cities and discuss topics just like this.
In
Out
27:35
I had brought it up at our last meeting.
In
Out
27:39
And a lot of communities weren't— they wanted to sort of see how things unveiled themselves before sort of jumping into making a decision.
In
Out
27:50
The only community that has started to really think about it and started to put in, you know, some language, I think, is Somerville.
In
Out
27:59
Yeah.
In
Out
28:01
Okay.
In
Out
28:01
So Somerville.
In
Out
28:04
That's interesting.
In
Out
28:06
Um, Stephanie, when you have that meeting and you got— and you have your powwow with your fellow colleagues, would you mind providing our office with kind of a synopsis of what the discussion was and seeing where that's headed?
In
Out
28:16
You can email the council office and they'll disseminate.
In
Out
28:18
Is that okay?
In
Out
28:19
Perfect.
In
Out
28:19
Yeah, we'd appreciate that.
In
Out
28:20
Thank you, Councilor Oliver.
In
Out
28:21
Sorry, but while it was fresh in my head, I wanted to get to that.
In
Out
28:25
Um, okay, so at least those conversations are, are happening.
In
Out
28:28
Is the— is the Is the biggest hesitation in the conversations that you have had is just— is mainly surrounded with the vagueness from the CCC, or— Yeah, I think, and just how is it going to be enforced?
In
Out
28:44
It's not super clear how that's going to happen.
In
Out
28:46
Yeah, okay.
In
Out
28:47
Because it doesn't— it falls on the CCC.
In
Out
28:50
It doesn't necessarily fall on the health department.
In
Out
28:52
There are things that, you know, locally we can do that we could enforce, but what the regulations say the CCC is supposed to enforce.
In
Out
29:01
Okay.
In
Out
29:01
Well, I do— how— not that I look to Somerville for much with some of the initiatives that come out of there, but how far along would you say Somerville is in this process?
In
Out
29:17
Do you know?
In
Out
29:18
Do you know off the top of your head?
In
Out
29:24
Would you mind going to the microphone, please, if you're going to speak, just for the record?
In
Out
29:26
Thank you.
In
Out
29:27
For the people at home, um, Somerville has passed— um, it looks like they've moved to, uh, to opt-in, um, and they've set some parameters.
In
Out
29:38
So, um, like for the event organizer, um, section of being a social consumption site, um, the state permits up to a certain number of days per year they've set their number.
In
Out
29:51
So as far as we've heard from the CCC, there's no available licenses yet.
In
Out
29:56
They're not that far along, but they've already begun their— and the— that vendor portion, is that like, like the festivals and stuff like that?
In
Out
30:07
Is that what— okay, okay.
In
Out
30:11
Temporary events.
In
Out
30:12
Yeah.
In
Out
30:12
So that's like a one-day special permit or something like that.
In
Out
30:15
They're gonna— there's an event, they set up the tents or whatever it is, and then they, they leave.
In
Out
30:19
Okay.
In
Out
30:21
Is there like, with those, are they available to have like concerts and things like that along with those types of?
In
Out
30:31
So the description that was put forth to us was that having a booth and a consumption space at a festival, hosting a social consumption event at, you know, we're imagining It would be feasts, festivals, right?
In
Out
30:45
Things like that.
In
Out
30:46
Okay.
In
Out
30:47
All right.
In
Out
30:48
So Somerville has opted in.
In
Out
30:50
Do you have any of that language?
In
Out
30:51
Does— as your— your— it's on their city's website.
In
Out
30:55
Okay.
In
Out
30:55
All right.
In
Out
30:55
We'll see if we can get a copy of that.
In
Out
30:57
Maybe even our office can help us with that too.
In
Out
30:59
Um, I'm going to yield for now, see if any of my colleagues have any other questions.
In
Out
31:03
And I, I'd like to speak with— we have several invited guests, so we'll get each of them up when appropriate.
In
Out
31:08
Thank you, Councilor.
In
Out
31:10
Anyone else on this committee have any questions for our health department professionals while they're up?
In
Out
31:17
All right, ladies, I think you're off the hot seat for now, but if there's a question, we'll call you back up.
In
Out
31:22
All right, Chief Thody, you're up.
In
Out
31:34
Good evening, Chief.
In
Out
31:35
Good evening.
In
Out
31:35
Good to see you again.
In
Out
31:36
Thanks for coming.
In
Out
31:37
So I'll kick it off.
In
Out
31:39
So the question I had asked our health department director, and rightfully so, she kind of deferred that to you.
In
Out
31:48
On-site cannabis consumption, if done responsibly, which we would hope folks do, like when they consume a drink at a bar or a pub or a restaurant responsibly, how is that any different than having a beer at the bar, or if you want to consume an edible, or have a, you know, a little smoke at a facility that is legal and authorized for cannabis.
In
Out
32:11
So, I mean, maybe you can educate us, or maybe it's no different or a little different.
In
Out
32:16
And if so, um, or not, I mean, how would you enforce any type of intoxication of cannabis, or do you even see that that could be an issue?
In
Out
32:26
Yeah, I mean, so the first thing is that you You know, you kind of hit the nail on the head.
In
Out
32:30
Responsible, you know, responsible establishment.
In
Out
32:33
I mean, even with alcohol, you know, we have bars in this city like we do in other cities that don't operate in a responsible way.
In
Out
32:40
And it's a public safety risk.
In
Out
32:42
Right.
In
Out
32:43
And once you kind of— once you give somebody the licenses and the permits to dispense alcohol and to be a bar, it's difficult to take that back, even if they're not being responsible.
In
Out
32:56
So the same, the same could be here.
In
Out
32:57
So in that way, you know, the risks I think are similar.
In
Out
33:02
Where they differ is in our ability, you know, at this point it's legal to consume.
In
Out
33:07
Most people buy it, consume it in their houses or somewhere that's not a large gathering.
In
Out
33:13
When you have it in a remote place, people tend to drive there and consume cannabis or alcohol, and then, and then they have to get in their car and they have to drive home.
In
Out
33:23
Now, is a valiant effort here to, to have the facilities work with us on, on a, on a transportation plan.
In
Out
33:31
It doesn't really indicate what that means or how much involvement that we as law enforcement or public safety would have in that.
In
Out
33:40
But we don't currently have a way to detect it roadside like you do a breathalyzer.
In
Out
33:46
You have DRE training, drug recognition training.
In
Out
33:50
But, but it is much more difficult for us to enforce operating under the influence when it comes to cannabis than it is with alcohol.
In
Out
33:59
There's just technology out there that allows it to happen with alcohol.
In
Out
34:03
There's not when, when you're dealing with cannabis.
In
Out
34:06
Often we don't know about it unless there's a really bad accident or a fatal accident, and there's blood tests and things like that that happen after, but the damage is done at that point.
In
Out
34:16
So I think that's probably the key— the key difference really is in the technology and the ability for us to enforce abuse.
In
Out
34:25
I know for the cannabis dispensaries, and I know you weren't here for those host agreement negotiations at that time, but we had in the host agreement language that all of these dispensaries had to have a full-time dedicated security team there to look for any potential issues.
In
Out
34:42
Any type of crime-related concerns.
In
Out
34:45
I mean, I would assume if we were to go forward, you wouldn't want that same type of language in this host agreement for these types of facilities.
In
Out
34:52
I would assume so, correct?
In
Out
34:53
You would want some type of— I don't want to say the term bouncer, but someone there to keep an eye out for those who may be intoxicated and to see who is coming in, who's going, making sure that IDs are checked appropriately, making sure that no one's getting served underage, all of that, correct?
In
Out
35:10
Yeah, I mean, I, I think again, in the, in the world of valiant efforts, um, you know, the CCC has put some language in here, you know, that there's some kind of training for the, for the folks that are dispensing this on these facilities.
In
Out
35:24
It reminds me of kind of the tips training that bartenders have to go through, and I think we all know how effective that is.
In
Out
35:30
It's not effective.
In
Out
35:32
Bouncers at, at bars Are they effective if you have the right management?
In
Out
35:39
So again, it just comes down to predicting whether the folks that run these facilities are going to do so in a tight, responsible manner.
In
Out
35:48
And that's hard to do.
In
Out
35:50
Well, once you give the permits, it's very difficult to get them back.
In
Out
35:54
I think at some point, though, in government, what we do, we have to take a leap of faith and say someone has presented a professional plan to us.
In
Out
36:02
They've shown us they have the financing, they have the infrastructure in place.
In
Out
36:07
We're going to take them at their word until they burn us.
In
Out
36:11
You know what I mean?
In
Out
36:11
Like, we're going to respect the fact that they're coming to us.
In
Out
36:15
You know, they're, they're, they're meeting all of our parameters, our zoning parameters, our health department parameters, law enforcement parameters, and they're going to do right by us.
In
Out
36:25
And if they don't, we'll call them back in and we'll revoke their license.
In
Out
36:29
We do what we have to do.
In
Out
36:29
But I think at some point, we have to take people at their word.
In
Out
36:33
I know exactly what you're saying, Chief.
In
Out
36:35
I agree with you.
In
Out
36:35
But I think at some point we have to— we can't assume that people would be a bad act— anyone that would come before us have— could have the potential to be a bad actor.
In
Out
36:44
Of course they could.
In
Out
36:45
But I would think that we're hoping that they're going to be legitimate, right?
In
Out
36:49
That's, that's the hope.
In
Out
36:50
I mean, we talked about responsible, correct?
In
Out
36:52
That's the key.
In
Out
36:53
Yeah, I, I think it's different when you're talking about something that when you're talking about operating under the influence, that I think everyone can agree is a significant public safety risk to pedestrian traffic, other vehicles on the road.
In
Out
37:06
I mean, that is a major problem across the country.
In
Out
37:08
And now we are putting in play a potential to be under the influence where we can't enforce it and we can't detect it.
In
Out
37:16
And I think that's the difference if we get to a place where, where technology catches up.
In
Out
37:21
And that's really the only problem I had with legalization in the first place.
In
Out
37:25
Well, just one more question and then I'll yield.
In
Out
37:27
Um, speaking of which, do we have— I mean, and I'm not trying to put you on the spot, but do you know, do we have any data on OUI arrests or apprehensions based off cannabis?
In
Out
37:38
That's— do we know offhand, like right now, given what Councilor Oliver said, you can buy a joint, go smoke it in your car right now or at your home, drive high, and I don't know what— do we have any of that going on right now that we know of other than possession or, uh, But as far as arresting someone for OUI based on our ability to legally know that they're over a limit, I don't know of any.
In
Out
38:01
I can check on that, but I don't know of that being enforced in that way.
In
Out
38:05
Okay.
In
Out
38:05
Now, I was curious.
In
Out
38:06
I didn't mean to put you on the spot, but I just wanted to know if you had any of that information.
In
Out
38:11
Thank you, Chief.
In
Out
38:12
I'll yield at this time from the chair.
In
Out
38:13
Thank you to my colleagues for allowing me and indulging me.
In
Out
38:16
I'll recognize the committee members first.
In
Out
38:18
Councilors Pemberton or Choquette, any questions for the chief while he's here?
In
Out
38:24
No.
In
Out
38:25
Councillor Oliver, you're up.
In
Out
38:27
Thank you, Mr.
In
Out
38:27
Chair.
In
Out
38:28
Thank you, Chief Thodey.
In
Out
38:29
Um, how many— um, I know that there's no way, there's no, uh, real measure to, to, to tell because there's no way to detect.
In
Out
38:38
The only way to do so is by a blood sample, is what you're saying, right?
In
Out
38:42
Is that, that's the main— there's no roadside, there's no roadside ways to detect it.
In
Out
38:47
I mean, there's, there's, there's definitely other ways.
In
Out
38:48
Is that something in the wide world of science that's happening though in real time?
In
Out
38:52
There are companies out there that are diligently and actively trying to figure that out, because there's obviously money to be made across the country if you can figure out a way to do that.
In
Out
39:03
And you can still give standardized field sobriety tests.
In
Out
39:07
They're just not— and that's where you get into a DRE-certified officer, drug recognition certified officer.
In
Out
39:15
It's just more difficult to do.
In
Out
39:18
So if you, you or your— any of the rank and file were to pull somebody over for suspicion of intoxication and you do your regular field sobriety test and they pass that, is there a time where you would have one of those other officers that are trained in the recognition to Could— would you call for one of them if you knew that that person wasn't under the influence of alcohol because there were no telltale signs that you— is that what— is that the process now?
In
Out
39:55
Or you can, yes, if— as long as there's one working.
In
Out
39:58
And, you know, we've, we've even called from other towns if you have a DRE-certified officer.
In
Out
40:03
That's not as common as, you know, everyone's certified to do breathalyzer and to do OUI after the academy.
In
Out
40:10
Not everyone is a DRE officer.
In
Out
40:12
Is that something that's going to— going forward, maybe not through the industry, but through your department, that you're looking to onboard more of those officers or get more?
In
Out
40:23
When training comes up, we do get people— we do get people trained in DRE.
In
Out
40:27
It's just— it's a more extensive training.
In
Out
40:29
It's— you have to keep up with it.
In
Out
40:31
How many— how many officers do we have right now that are trained?
In
Out
40:33
I'm not sure how many we have that are DRE certified.
In
Out
40:35
In my agency that I left not too long ago was 475 people, and I think we had 4.
In
Out
40:42
Okay, would you say that we're kind of somewhere in the same ballpark with only a handful?
In
Out
40:48
I would say the number is probably low, but I can get back to you on that.
In
Out
40:51
Okay, if you couldn't, just provide that information to the chair.
In
Out
40:59
What does the— what does the DRE— what are they— what is it that they're looking for that's different than a field sobriety test, than a normal field sobriety test?
In
Out
41:07
I have not done the DRE training.
In
Out
41:09
That's fine.
In
Out
41:09
I didn't mean to put you on the spot.
In
Out
41:11
I just didn't know.
In
Out
41:12
All right.
In
Out
41:16
Again, I think I had mentioned it with the speakers before you.
In
Out
41:22
These items are available for consumption right now throughout the Commonwealth, throughout our city.
In
Out
41:28
They're being bought.
In
Out
41:30
They're being consumed.
In
Out
41:34
In your opinion, Do you honestly feel that a location like this would exacerbate the issue, or are these things going to happen on a daily basis anyways?
In
Out
41:48
I think, like I said, I think the exacerbation of the issue really is that inviting people out and having a way to get— I mean, the simple answer to even going to a bar would be to get an Uber to the bar, get an Uber home.
In
Out
42:00
Right.
In
Out
42:01
We solve a lot of problems.
In
Out
42:02
But folks just aren't doing that.
In
Out
42:04
So I think, you know, the difference or the risk is that, you know, we're inviting them out of their house and into a place where this consumption takes place without really— I mean, it's common knowledge.
In
Out
42:17
We're not secret here.
In
Out
42:19
It's common knowledge that we don't really have a way to test for that.
In
Out
42:22
So I think that kind of emboldens people to say this is an intoxication that the police can't test for.
In
Out
42:30
So I'm more willing to take a risk on driving under the influence with that That's my opinion.
In
Out
42:37
You know, I think as the industry catches up and there's more ways to look into this, for us to enforce it, I think it becomes really not much different than a bar.
In
Out
42:48
The— but it's, it's still— are we not inviting them out with selling the product?
In
Out
42:57
Well, they're going to know that they're going to consume it in one way or another.
In
Out
43:00
They have to drive to the facility to consume it.
In
Out
43:02
So we're also to purchase it.
In
Out
43:04
So we're also entrusting those people that they're going to go home and consume it there responsibly.
In
Out
43:13
And if you drive around the city at any point in time, you know that that's not happening in real time.
In
Out
43:19
You can be in traffic or at a red light and you can smell what's going on in the car in front of you.
In
Out
43:24
So these, these things are still happening on a daily basis, and it's not a slight on your department at all.
In
Out
43:29
It's almost— you can't be on every corner at every red light at every, you know, so it's just that it's still happening.
In
Out
43:38
I think in a— I know that the concern is what happens when they leave, and I think that the bigger part of that is probably figuring out a better business model on how they're going to get home responsibly, because the fact of the matter is that It's happening every day in the Commonwealth.
In
Out
44:00
I think we're just going to— if we're hesitant and not going to give it a shot, we're going to be left being last to the starting blocks again.
In
Out
44:13
I just don't want to do that.
In
Out
44:15
I'm hearing all the cautionary tales.
In
Out
44:22
Fair Haven opens one up tomorrow, or, you know, whatever, they speedline one, and they're gonna, you know, have an influx coming in, and that's gonna affect us as well here in the city of New Bedford because those people are gonna drive through our roads as well.
In
Out
44:37
So I think that just me personally, and this is me on my soapbox, I think we're gonna miss an opportunity here if we don't act.
In
Out
44:44
And but I appreciate you coming in and telling us a little bit about this the situation.
In
Out
44:49
One more question that I would have for you is you had alluded to we don't know till after the fact or it's too late.
In
Out
44:55
How many accidents a year that would you say, or could you get that information, that upon testing that we found out that they were under the influence of something other than alcohol?
In
Out
45:12
I can get that that information.
In
Out
45:14
I don't have that statistic.
In
Out
45:15
All right, if you can get that for the— if you can get that for the, the chair as well, that would be great.
In
Out
45:19
Thank you.
In
Out
45:20
And, and Chief, if we get to a point where we're going to start working on a zoning ordinance for these, we want you at that table.
In
Out
45:26
I mean, your predecessor was at the table when we did it for the dispensaries, so we would want you there because, you know, you would be an integral part to making sure we do it correctly.
In
Out
45:36
So just so you know, um, you'd be a part of that process as long as you'd want, or designee, your deputy or whatever, but Would love you to be a part of that as well.
In
Out
45:45
Absolutely.
In
Out
45:45
Thank you.
In
Out
45:46
Appreciate it.
In
Out
45:47
Thank you.
In
Out
45:47
Anyone else for the chief?
In
Out
45:50
Anyone else?
In
Out
45:51
All right, chief, you're all set.
In
Out
45:53
Thank you.
In
Out
45:53
Mr. Casembo, if you want to go home, you can.
In
Out
45:56
You're— your item— you're welcome to stay, but your item is all done.
In
Out
45:58
So you want to stay?
In
Out
46:00
I love it.
In
Out
46:00
That's great.
In
Out
46:01
All right, uh, next invited guest, we have, uh, Planner Carloni.
In
Out
46:04
Jen, you're up.
In
Out
46:11
I don't want you to waste your time, Jen.
In
Out
46:12
I mean, you came all the way down here, so— Good evening, council members.
In
Out
46:17
Good to see you.
In
Out
46:18
Good to see you.
In
Out
46:21
So if we were to have that conversation in the next couple of months about, all right, the administration is interested, there's an appetite, we see what the rollout is from colleagues throughout the state, and we're having those conversations, I just— and again, we're at 30,000 feet here, and You know, don't hold me to this, but do you foresee at first glance the zoning for these kind of being like what we did for dispensaries, maybe in certain like industrial zones, maybe some mixed-use zones and buffers in place obviously from schools and daycares, things like that?
In
Out
46:55
Would it be somewhat analogous to that?
In
Out
46:57
You would think, right?
In
Out
46:58
So I'm not an expert on the regulations yet, and I think there's still more to be found.
In
Out
47:04
Would you mind just pulling the microphone?
In
Out
47:05
Sure.
In
Out
47:05
I think, I think they're— I'm not an expert on the regulations.
In
Out
47:08
Understood.
In
Out
47:09
Again, 30,000 feet, right?
In
Out
47:10
That's where we're at.
In
Out
47:12
From what I've read so far, I think I have concerns relative to are they going to require us to put new zoning or allow us to put new zoning in place?
In
Out
47:22
Because how you read it now is they're allowing these, these facilities to go into the existing ones that we've already permitted.
In
Out
47:30
They're allowing, um, on-site consumption via these event— these 3 different categories, as Stephanie and everybody talked about, this hospitality and these event ones.
In
Out
47:41
And so it's not clear to me whether they're going to be regulated by zoning, and that's a concern because, right, we've, we've looked at this in a certain way, and those zoning that we had put in place for the retail was very thoughtful and it was meant for those type of facilities.
In
Out
48:00
And you were, you were involved in that back then.
In
Out
48:02
It was Tabitha Harkin, you were on her team at that point, right?
In
Out
48:05
It was on the first round of the HCAs.
In
Out
48:07
We worked all together on the— yes, yes.
In
Out
48:09
So I've sat through all of that.
In
Out
48:10
And so I think for me, I would be concerned as a planning perspective, putting your planning hat on.
In
Out
48:15
Now you've got a different use.
In
Out
48:17
You've gone from having a retail use to now event use.
In
Out
48:20
So what does the traffic look like?
In
Out
48:22
What does the the parking look like?
In
Out
48:23
And as we know from the first round of the marijuana rollout, parking was a major issue, traffic was a major issue at the places that had it first, and then it petered out, right?
In
Out
48:33
But I don't know what this is going to look like because it's new.
In
Out
48:36
We don't really know how that looks in terms of is that an appropriate use, you know, next to industrial sites now?
In
Out
48:42
Do we want people to be gathering there?
In
Out
48:45
Is that, is that going to be a concern for businesses?
In
Out
48:47
Is that going to be concern for some areas where we did try to keep it away from residential, but there are still ones that are close, close to residential.
In
Out
48:53
So indoor, outdoor, and then these event ones.
In
Out
48:56
Again, I don't know if they're allowing us to regulate them by zoning or if they're allowing— if they're just allowed to go by the special permit process.
In
Out
49:04
So now you're going to have them in different locations.
In
Out
49:06
So I think for me, location-specific and location-based concerns are apparent at this time that are not answered for me.
In
Out
49:13
Similar to what Ms. Sloan said, are you having conversations with your colleagues throughout the state?
In
Out
49:18
Are you about to have those conversations kind of to wrap your head around this with all of your colleagues throughout the Commonwealth?
In
Out
49:23
I would say I haven't been as in-depth as the Health Department, I think because it's, it's, you know, it's been relatively new.
In
Out
49:28
It just came out in January and there's still a lot of questions out there.
In
Out
49:31
So I haven't, I haven't dived into it too in-depth.
In
Out
49:35
We have been doing a lot of our zoning initiatives.
In
Out
49:37
I've been focused on those, but we will absolutely look into it further.
In
Out
49:42
Similar to what we asked Ms. Sloan, when you do get those reports, would you mind just summarizing what what your colleagues are doing so we have an idea.
In
Out
49:48
And we're obviously going to table this item.
In
Out
49:51
We're going to bring this back every month or every other month to see kind of what the progress is, or maybe no progress.
In
Out
49:56
But I think we have to keep this conversation going because I agree with Councilor Oliver, we don't want to be, in my opinion, stuck, stuck behind the 8-ball here.
In
Out
50:05
Because you hit the nail on the head, sir.
In
Out
50:07
If Fall River and Fairhaven beats us to the punch in Dartmouth, they're going to consume that anyway and come through New Bedford.
In
Out
50:14
The odds are they probably live in New Bedford anyway.
In
Out
50:16
We are the hub of the South Coast, so there's a good chance they live here anyway.
In
Out
50:21
Thank you, Jen.
In
Out
50:22
Any questions for Miss Carloni?
In
Out
50:24
Any of the colleagues on this committee?
In
Out
50:26
Councilors?
In
Out
50:27
No.
In
Out
50:28
Councilor Oliver?
In
Out
50:28
Nothing.
In
Out
50:29
Jen, you got off easy.
In
Out
50:31
Thank you.
In
Out
50:32
The only other guest that's— the administration's not here, so We do have Solicitor Jakes.
In
Out
50:39
Does anyone want to speak to Eric?
In
Out
50:42
All right.
In
Out
50:42
I'll acknowledge the committee members first.
In
Out
50:45
No?
In
Out
50:45
Neither one of you?
In
Out
50:47
All right, Eric, you're up.
In
Out
50:58
Thank you.
In
Out
50:58
If standing is trouble for you, you can sit in one of the councilors' seats and you can— you okay?
In
Out
51:04
Okay, standing is fine.
In
Out
51:05
Thank you, Councilor.
In
Out
51:06
No problem, sir.
In
Out
51:07
All right, the chair recognizes Councilor Oliver.
In
Out
51:09
Uh, thank you, Mr.
In
Out
51:10
Chair.
In
Out
51:10
Um, thank you, uh, Attorney Jakes, uh, for being here.
In
Out
51:14
Quick, simple question.
In
Out
51:16
Um, have— has any communication from the administration happened to say, hey, this might be something that's coming down the pipe, we should probably start working on some language, or anything like that?
In
Out
51:28
At this point, my office and the administration are waiting to see what on earth is going to happen.
In
Out
51:34
Okay.
In
Out
51:35
The licenses have not yet been drafted.
In
Out
51:37
We don't know what that process looks like.
In
Out
51:39
The implementation hasn't been implemented in any way, shape, or form.
In
Out
51:45
There's all kinds of questions about how do you train.
In
Out
51:50
The chief has addressed this.
In
Out
51:51
Other people have addressed this.
In
Out
51:53
There's concerns about when the HCAs were originally granted, those people in the neighborhood where they were going to occur thought people would drive up and walk out the door with their package and go somewhere else.
In
Out
52:08
Now there are going to be, depending upon the size of the dispensaries, a large number, significant number of persons at a dispensary imbibing and then leaving.
In
Out
52:21
There's no guarantee that they're going to get an Uber to leave.
In
Out
52:25
There's a provision which I find amusing for a cool-down section.
In
Out
52:30
How on earth are these people going to be able to judge whether or not someone needs to cool down?
In
Out
52:36
How long do they need to cool down?
In
Out
52:39
There's no real test.
In
Out
52:41
Uh, we have field sobriety tests that trained police officers do, police academy stuff, not a little publication of 2 or 3 pages from the CCC that says, oh, this is what you should look for.
In
Out
52:56
How do you know how long they should be?
In
Out
52:58
And if they don't want to cool down, there's no provision to keep them there.
In
Out
53:03
So there's a whole host of questions that haven't been answered.
In
Out
53:08
And I'm not affirmatively stating that the administration is opposed to this.
In
Out
53:14
I'm just saying there are so, so many unanswered questions and so many concerns that need to be addressed.
In
Out
53:23
I mean, I looked at the regulations today.
In
Out
53:28
You can't find them unless you look for the draft from last August.
In
Out
53:32
I found the draft from last August.
In
Out
53:35
I believe this is what they ultimately passed on December 11th and implemented on January 2nd, but we know nothing about the training.
In
Out
53:45
We know nothing about where they're going to go.
In
Out
53:48
These MEOs make me nervous.
In
Out
53:51
Up to 30 a year in the city.
In
Out
53:55
Where are they going to go?
In
Out
53:56
How big are they going to be?
In
Out
53:58
Is it going to be at a festival?
In
Out
54:00
You can't have alcohol where you have these things.
In
Out
54:02
So are they going to drink in their car and then walk into the fort or into a park and then imbibe further, go back to their car?
In
Out
54:11
I don't know.
In
Out
54:13
The hospitality ones, they're complicated.
In
Out
54:17
Just, we'll call it the Acme Hotel.
In
Out
54:20
They've got a conference center where they do weddings and whatever.
In
Out
54:24
Well, there can be no alcohol there.
In
Out
54:26
It's got to be a separate spot.
In
Out
54:28
Well, where is it going to be?
In
Out
54:29
And are these people going to drive away or are they staying in rooms?
In
Out
54:34
The odds are in a hotel they're probably going to stay, but who knows?
In
Out
54:38
So there's just a whole heck of a lot of potential pitfalls.
In
Out
54:42
And as a lawyer, my major concern is the safety of the public.
In
Out
54:48
I would hate to see New Bedford say, hey, we're missing out on 3% excise tax from this place, and someone stays there, overindulges in marijuana, gets involved in an accident and kills someone, and we as a city have to explain to a parent, oh yeah, we wanted the 3% excise tax— is it worth it?
In
Out
55:18
I think that's a question that the council needs to balance and the administration needs to look at.
In
Out
55:23
And that's me as a lawyer speaking.
In
Out
55:25
That's not the administration speaking.
In
Out
55:27
That's me tonight personally interjecting my own thoughts when I shouldn't.
In
Out
55:31
But I don't want to be the person talking to that parent because we wanted to make some extra money.
In
Out
55:39
Yeah, and I, and I, and I get that, and I don't think anybody wants, wants to make that phone call, that's for sure.
In
Out
55:46
The fact is that, you know, these phone calls are, you know, still happening as, as is right now.
In
Out
55:53
People are still consuming that.
In
Out
55:55
So I don't think that one established 1, 2, a couple establishments are going to more really fall on the, the city, uh, to do.
In
Out
56:04
But I do understand the, the, the sky is falling mentality, and I'm glad that the conversations are at least happening with the administration about it as it gets closer to something coming.
In
Out
56:15
The fact of the matter is something's gonna come down, um, somebody's going to benefit from it.
In
Out
56:20
And I understand what you're saying, but at what cost?
In
Out
56:25
Um, and I, I, it was a good concern that you had brought up that when these establishments for retail were first set up, it was come grab your stuff and go home.
In
Out
56:35
You know, I was also under the assumption that by allowing it, I was going to get a whole heck of a lot of revenue coming in, and the state took that money away.
In
Out
56:44
Um, so, um, that's a, a horse of a different color, but I, I couldn't not say that, um, that it was sold to us as a, as a false bill of goods too.
In
Out
56:57
Um, but I am at least glad that the communication is happening with your office and the mayor and that we're looking forward to, uh, see what's happening.
In
Out
57:04
So that's all I wanted to find out was see if those conversations were happening.
In
Out
57:08
Thank you, Councilor.
In
Out
57:08
And that's the key, right, Councilor Oliver?
In
Out
57:10
We're having the conversation, right?
In
Out
57:12
I, I would venture a guess there's going to be tabled at least 3 or 4 times throughout this year, and we're going to continue this conversation throughout this year as this gets fleshed out.
In
Out
57:22
Uh, the chair recognizes Councilor Choquette.
In
Out
57:24
You wanted the floor?
In
Out
57:26
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
In
Out
57:27
Good evening, Mr.
In
Out
57:28
Solicitor.
In
Out
57:29
Good evening, Mr. Choquette.
In
Out
57:30
Um, I just happen to be the foremost expert on my opinion, and my opinion on this, and just to be heard on the record, um, yes, we have to be cautious.
In
Out
57:44
We don't want the city to get into any suits that we don't need to be in.
In
Out
57:50
But please just remember that in regards to people abusing products, we have people abusing nitrous oxide, which is currently being sold as we speak on Acushnet Avenue to people under the age of 18.
In
Out
58:03
We still haven't shored that up.
In
Out
58:05
So there are many, many loopholes in the law, in multiple laws.
In
Out
58:10
So So again, we need to be cautious, but we also have to— and I defer to Councilor Oliver's point— there are many people— I mean, you know, and I'm not saying that— I'm not saying this to be derogatory, but I mean, you're kidding yourself and the mayor's kidding himself if he thinks that nobody's driving around smoking weed or is intoxicated by marijuana and driving, you know, an automobile.
In
Out
58:38
With all due respect, Councilor, I don't believe that the mayor is that naive.
In
Out
58:45
My point is, by allowing groups to come together and smoke on premises where they're licensed, they're going to travel home.
In
Out
58:57
That's going to increase the opportunity for an accident that doesn't exist when they're mainly consuming it at home.
In
Out
59:08
We're increasing the risk.
In
Out
59:10
In my personal opinion, isn't necessary.
In
Out
59:13
But again, that's my opinion, and this is the council body's decision to make, not mine.
In
Out
59:19
Okay.
In
Out
59:20
And again, just, just my opinion.
In
Out
59:22
So I just wanted to put that out there on the record, that I think it, you know, it's a possible financial opportunity for the city that, you know, we really don't want to see slip by.
In
Out
59:32
I mean, we have been so desperate to make money that we're willing to put a trash transfer station in Ward 1 for 75 jobs and for some money, $3 million a year.
In
Out
59:44
So we shouldn't be picking and choosing with such stringency, you know, when we could potentially make out financially with this.
In
Out
59:56
But again, I understand where the caution is.
In
Out
59:59
But I also want to say that, you know, we need to be brave about this because if we don't take advantage of this, some other community will.
In
Out
1:00:09
And these people, like Councilor Oliver and Councilor Raybould said, they're going to drive through our community nonetheless.
In
Out
1:00:15
I mean, this is New Bedford with the hub of the region.
In
Out
1:00:17
So these are all things to consider.
In
Out
1:00:20
And I hope, you know, that everybody who's listening to this will think of those items.
In
Out
1:00:26
This is not just an A versus B issue.
In
Out
1:00:29
It's pretty complicated.
In
Out
1:00:31
And again, thank you, Mr.
In
Out
1:00:33
Solicitor, for your time.
In
Out
1:00:35
It's always a pleasure to appear before this body.
In
Out
1:00:37
Thank you, sir.
In
Out
1:00:38
All right, thank you, Mr. Chairman.
In
Out
1:00:39
Thank you, Councillor.
In
Out
1:00:40
Anyone else for Solicitor Jakes?
In
Out
1:00:44
I, I will, just from the chair.
In
Out
1:00:45
Um, I hear you loud and clear, and you— I know you had said you you, not the administration, but you as an attorney, you as a human being, you have concerns about large groups, you said, or gatherings where cannabis would be consumed.
In
Out
1:00:57
I can definitely see that point.
In
Out
1:00:59
And I just wonder, I mean, last month we had a big football game, the Super Bowl.
In
Out
1:01:06
We had restaurants and bars all over having huge Super Bowl parties.
In
Out
1:01:09
We just had St. Patrick's Day.
In
Out
1:01:11
Were you concerned about large groups of people leaving there after indulging in green beer and shots and all that good stuff?
In
Out
1:01:18
Of course I am, Councilor.
In
Out
1:01:20
Okay, good.
In
Out
1:01:20
And I rely upon my police department and the folks in the bars who are supposedly trained to recognize when someone has had too much.
In
Out
1:01:33
And that line is certainly not as clear with marijuana.
In
Out
1:01:37
And I think the chief made that point to you.
In
Out
1:01:39
No, he did.
In
Out
1:01:40
But I just want to make sure, just, you know, because— and, you know, listen, I'm not— Ian, you can probably find me in a bar in New Bedford on a given evening.
In
Out
1:01:49
Oh, listen, I don't think you want that on the record.
In
Out
1:01:53
I'm fine with that.
In
Out
1:01:54
Okay, so you're on the record then.
In
Out
1:01:57
But you know what though, Eric, you are an adult making an adult decision, aren't you?
In
Out
1:02:01
And you're doing so responsibly, right?
In
Out
1:02:04
I am.
In
Out
1:02:04
Not all adults are responsible.
In
Out
1:02:06
And I certainly was nowhere near as responsible when I was younger.
In
Out
1:02:10
Well, okay, well, we'll leave it at that.
In
Out
1:02:14
You're a good sport, though.
In
Out
1:02:15
We appreciate you.
In
Out
1:02:16
And we'll, uh, as this process evolves or maybe devolves, you know, we'll, uh, obviously you're gonna have— you, like the chief and everyone else here, you're gonna have a seat at that table with the administration.
In
Out
1:02:26
We're gonna talk.
In
Out
1:02:27
And I appreciate you, you know that.
In
Out
1:02:29
Thank you.
In
Out
1:02:30
Thank you, Councilor.
In
Out
1:02:31
Good to see you.
In
Out
1:02:32
Anyone else for Solicitor Jakes while he's here?
In
Out
1:02:34
We don't want him going up and down.
In
Out
1:02:37
I know he's— all right, thank you, Eric.
In
Out
1:02:39
Thank you.
In
Out
1:02:40
All right, so I think it is appropriate, unless anyone wants to make a little, you know, you know, a little speech before we entertain a motion to table.
In
Out
1:02:49
I think tabling would be appropriate at this time given what we know, what we don't know, given the CCC guidance or lack thereof, and the fact that we have department heads who are on the record that they're gonna do some homework, speak to their colleagues, and report back.
In
Out
1:03:02
So at this time, I will detain a motion to table.
In
Out
1:03:06
Yep.
In
Out
1:03:07
Mr. Chairman, I make a motion to table this item.
In
Out
1:03:10
Councillor Choquette, seconded by Councillor Pemberton.
In
Out
1:03:13
All those in favor say aye.
In
Out
1:03:14
Aye.
In
Out
1:03:15
Opposed?
In
Out
1:03:15
The ayes have it.
In
Out
1:03:16
Thank you all.
In
Out
1:03:17
Some of you are staying for item 3, so don't go, don't go too far.
In
Out
1:03:21
Item number 3 is before us.
In
Out
1:03:23
Related motion, Councillor Lopes requesting that the city council engage the appropriate department heads to explore the possibility, the feasibility of permitting on-site tobacco consumption, commonly referred to as cigar lounges.
In
Out
1:03:36
I need a motion to receive and place this item on file.
In
Out
1:03:39
Motion to receive and place on file, made by Councillor Choquette, seconded by Councillor Pemberton.
In
Out
1:03:44
Anyone on the question?
In
Out
1:03:45
All those in favor say aye.
In
Out
1:03:47
Aye.
In
Out
1:03:47
Opposed?
In
Out
1:03:48
The ayes have it.
In
Out
1:03:48
Again, this is a, a motion from Councillor Lopes, who is a member of this committee.
In
Out
1:03:52
He couldn't make it tonight.
In
Out
1:03:54
He knows that we are going to table this out of respect for him.
In
Out
1:03:57
So that he can come back next month and ask his questions.
In
Out
1:04:01
But since we have folks here, we do have committee members, and we do have councilors here who may have questions, I will entertain questions tonight for our invited guests out of respect for them, and then we will bring this back for Councilor Lopes.
In
Out
1:04:15
So with that being said, um, Councilor Choquette or Pemberton, do you have any druthers as to who we call up first?
In
Out
1:04:22
Chair recognizes Councilor Choquette.
In
Out
1:04:23
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
In
Out
1:04:25
Could we hear from Ms. Stephanie Sloan?
In
Out
1:04:27
Sure.
In
Out
1:04:28
Stephanie.
In
Out
1:04:35
Hello.
In
Out
1:04:36
Hi.
In
Out
1:04:36
Thank you, Madam Director.
In
Out
1:04:38
So I guess my question is, in your opinion, what has been the big hurdle to having a cigar lounge?
In
Out
1:04:50
Located in the city of New Bedford?
In
Out
1:04:54
So our Board of Health has put a lot of effort into our tobacco regulations.
In
Out
1:05:04
And back in 2019, we put a descending cap on our retailers and sort of the impetus between— for doing that is that we had one of the highest smoking rates in Massachusetts.
In
Out
1:05:22
We also had a much higher number of retailers per capita than the state average.
In
Out
1:05:31
And so when we looked at all of the data surrounding tobacco and lung cancer and smoking rates for our community, our board said we had to do something.
In
Out
1:05:45
So we put in the descending cap.
In
Out
1:05:50
We updated our regulations.
In
Out
1:05:53
And our number of retailers has come down.
In
Out
1:06:00
We have smoke-free workplace regulations.
In
Out
1:06:04
So cigar bars are in complete, you know, conflict with that.
In
Out
1:06:10
Our board also specifically called out cigar bars, lounges in our regulations as not being allowable.
In
Out
1:06:23
And so I think from the board's perspective, entertaining a cigar bar would us be taking steps back in all the progress that we've made up until this point.
In
Out
1:06:36
Okay, so it's your conclusion that if the city were to allow a small amount of cigar lounges, that it would, um, I guess, initiate a return to those smoking levels?
In
Out
1:06:55
I think our board's charge, right, is to think about the health of our community.
In
Out
1:07:05
And, you know, secondhand smoke, inhaling smoke through combustion, it's not healthy.
In
Out
1:07:14
And so I don't, I don't think they want to move backwards.
In
Out
1:07:16
And, you know, I have no problem saying that on the record that I do agree with you partly.
In
Out
1:07:22
I mean, I never knew 3 of my 4 grandparents because of tobacco.
In
Out
1:07:27
So it is something that has bothered me for a long time.
In
Out
1:07:31
But the difference would be is that they consumed cigarettes on their own accord.
In
Out
1:07:37
You know what I mean?
In
Out
1:07:38
They weren't doing it in a workplace.
In
Out
1:07:40
They were doing it at home or whatever.
In
Out
1:07:44
And none of them smoked cigars.
In
Out
1:07:47
And I understand that, yeah, it's still tobacco, right?
In
Out
1:07:51
It still has those same deleterious effects.
In
Out
1:07:53
Effects.
In
Out
1:07:53
You know, I mean, I went to school for science and biology, and I have a master's in microbiology, so I understand all the science, the cancer, you know, the mutagenic effects at the cellular level and the DNA level.
In
Out
1:08:07
But that being said, you know, I mean, can you really prove that allowing cigar use on a limited basis in a confined area is with the proper equipment, scrubbers, etc., you know, can you really show that that would cause additional underage smoking and, you know, secondhand smoke to the general public?
In
Out
1:08:33
And I don't know, I mean, I don't think that that's necessarily a cause and effect as far as— yes, the smoke will cause cancer.
In
Out
1:08:45
It's been proven as Much as, you know, this is going to fall because of gravity, right?
In
Out
1:08:50
I mean, these are truths.
In
Out
1:08:54
But having a controlled environment where the general public— thank you, sir, you didn't have to do that— having a controlled environment, right, where the general public doesn't access it, you know, and it's only accessed by individuals who are making that conscious choice to imbibe in a cigar.
In
Out
1:09:14
Right.
In
Out
1:09:15
I think that at least one of my colleagues here tonight would agree that, you know, that that's not something that's going to harm the general public.
In
Out
1:09:24
And again, I'm the master of my own opinion.
In
Out
1:09:27
That's my opinion.
In
Out
1:09:30
So I guess I'll yield the floor to other colleagues.
In
Out
1:09:34
Thank you.
In
Out
1:09:34
Thank you, Madam Director.
In
Out
1:09:37
Thank you, Councilor.
In
Out
1:09:38
I'm not sure if that was a question, but, but I agree with you, a lot of your points.
In
Out
1:09:42
Uh, do you want to respond to that?
In
Out
1:09:44
Uh, it was kind of a statement, but if you want to respond, please, if you feel like you want to.
In
Out
1:09:52
I think the board, um, you know, there's not going to be one, one decision or one regulation that's gonna, you know, prevent people from smoking initiation or from lung cancer or from secondhand smoke exposure.
In
Out
1:10:13
But the board, you know, it's going to be a lot of things.
In
Out
1:10:18
It's going to be education.
In
Out
1:10:19
It's going to be descending retail caps.
In
Out
1:10:22
It's going to be, you know, other regulations.
In
Out
1:10:26
And, you know, it's our board's job to protect the health of our community.
In
Out
1:10:31
And even if people are making decisions, you know, if If you're going to a cigar bar with friends, some people don't smoke, some people are still getting secondhand smoke.
In
Out
1:10:43
If it is a small number, I mean, there's still— there are still community members that our board cares about and they care about their health.
In
Out
1:10:54
Did you yield?
In
Out
1:10:55
Did you still want to?
In
Out
1:10:57
I yield.
In
Out
1:10:57
Okay.
In
Out
1:10:57
I'm going to assume my colleague may have some questions for Director Sloan.
In
Out
1:11:01
Councillor Pemberton, you're good.
In
Out
1:11:05
You want— Councillor Oliver?
In
Out
1:11:09
Um, sure, just to— um, so no, I, I hear what you're saying, I really do.
In
Out
1:11:17
And you know, I think the world of you.
In
Out
1:11:18
I just, I, I respectfully disagree.
In
Out
1:11:22
I just, you know, I, I don't know, Miss Sloan.
In
Out
1:11:24
I just, um, if you're going to a cigar bar And even if you don't smoke, you're choosing to go there and you know full well you're going to inhale secondhand smoke, right?
In
Out
1:11:35
You know this.
In
Out
1:11:36
And you have the free will as an adult of 18+ to not go in there.
In
Out
1:11:42
Or 21+ if there's a bar element to it.
In
Out
1:11:44
So you chose not to go in there or not go in there.
In
Out
1:11:48
So it's not like anyone's forcing those folks against their will to inhale that secondhand smoke.
In
Out
1:11:53
Do you know what I mean?
In
Out
1:11:55
I do, but I also think our board has an opportunity to protect those people too.
In
Out
1:12:05
Okay, uh, Councillor Oliver.
In
Out
1:12:10
Thank you, Mr.
In
Out
1:12:10
Chair.
In
Out
1:12:11
Thank you, Stephanie.
In
Out
1:12:12
Um, I think this was the, the reason for our meeting a couple weeks ago.
In
Out
1:12:19
Yes.
In
Out
1:12:20
Um, The— we can agree that the cigar smoker and the cigarette smoker are 2 different consumers, correct?
In
Out
1:12:31
Not necessarily.
In
Out
1:12:34
I don't know many cigar smokers that smoke on a daily basis and chain-rip cigars.
In
Out
1:12:39
I can tell you that.
In
Out
1:12:41
Right, but tobacco— people who smoke tobacco— They're— because it's tobacco and they're utilizing the product, they're the same, but the methods in which they consume it are far different.
In
Out
1:12:56
Not the actual method, but like the regularity of the utilization of that product.
In
Out
1:13:04
Sure, but they could also smoke cigarettes as well.
In
Out
1:13:07
They could, and they can go home and they can smoke marijuana too because it's legal, but sure.
In
Out
1:13:14
But the cigar smoker, how they consume a cigar in— nobody, not many people are buying 20 at a time unless they're buying it in bulk to put in their humidor or something like that or whatever it may be.
In
Out
1:13:31
Most people, and especially with some of these type of establishments, they're buying one at a time to consume it and they're done and they've indulged in their off to the races and there's no need for field sobriety tests for this type of product.
In
Out
1:13:46
But the cigarette smoker and the cigar smoker, in my opinion, are 2 different consumers.
In
Out
1:13:54
That is not your stance?
In
Out
1:13:58
I mean, typically from my— from people that have been around me, but I don't know if that's the standard across.
In
Out
1:14:06
Okay, the community.
In
Out
1:14:07
Um, I know that you had concerns when we met and you voiced them a little bit about, uh, essentially peer pressure, right?
In
Out
1:14:15
That's what we're trying to combat here is the— because my friends are going to the cigar bar, I must go to the cigar bar so I'm not called a name or something.
In
Out
1:14:25
So, but I really don't want to go even though I'm an adult making the decision to go.
In
Out
1:14:33
The Board of Health is looking out for that person because of the potential for secondhand smoke of being forced to the bar due to peer pressure?
In
Out
1:14:41
I mean, all the people, right?
In
Out
1:14:44
The people smoking too are also getting secondhand smoke from themselves, from other people around them, because they physically went to that establishment to consume that and knew that a— not— I don't want to use consequence, but knew that a cause of an effect would be I go to the cigar bar, there's going to be cigar smoke there.
In
Out
1:15:05
Sure, they're making adult decisions, right?
In
Out
1:15:08
But that doesn't mean that our board can't also make decisions to also protect their health, even though they're making adult decisions.
In
Out
1:15:19
And with the, um, decreasing numbers of licenses as they come you know, as they slowly decrease, I guess, through the measures that have been put in place, is it the ultimate goal of the Board of Health and the, and the Health Department to make New Bedford 100% smoke-free?
In
Out
1:15:46
Is that what these initiatives are intended to do?
In
Out
1:15:49
I think when the cap originally came into place, the board was going to reevaluate when we were at the state average.
In
Out
1:15:58
We're not there yet.
In
Out
1:15:59
The board has also changed.
In
Out
1:16:01
Members on the board have changed since then.
In
Out
1:16:03
So I haven't specifically asked them that question.
In
Out
1:16:07
We haven't talked about, you know, being smoke-free or generation smoke-free generation for New Bedford.
In
Out
1:16:14
That's not something we've talked about because we're having difficulty even getting our retailers to come into compliance.
In
Out
1:16:20
Compliance as it is.
In
Out
1:16:22
So we're really working on trying to get our current retailers into compliance.
In
Out
1:16:27
How many of those compliance complaints or violations involved cigars?
In
Out
1:16:37
Not wraps, not any of that, just going to an establishment who sells them.
In
Out
1:16:44
I wasn't going to— I was going to name somebody, but I won't.
In
Out
1:16:48
To purchase one cigar and they walked out with that?
In
Out
1:16:52
You know, I— do you have it?
In
Out
1:17:00
Okay.
In
Out
1:17:01
So in the calendar year 2025, we had 17 sales to minors.
In
Out
1:17:10
That was 11% of our compliance checks resulted in sales.
In
Out
1:17:15
Of those 17 sales, 7 were cigars and cigarillos.
In
Out
1:17:21
7 of them.
In
Out
1:17:22
7 of the 17.
In
Out
1:17:24
And that was in 2005?
In
Out
1:17:25
That was in 2000— yeah, '25 calendar year.
In
Out
1:17:28
Okay.
In
Out
1:17:30
And I assume that's, you know, various locations.
In
Out
1:17:36
Those are 7 different locations that these occurred?
In
Out
1:17:38
Okay, so the major concern about having this establishment is just overall general health of the people who are most likely consuming this stuff already.
In
Out
1:17:55
Yeah, and I think we also talked about, you know, smoke migration.
In
Out
1:18:01
We've had problems with that in the past.
In
Out
1:18:05
Um, if the— we have a lot of multi-use, you know, zoning, um, and so, you know, it's, it's hard for the smoke not to migrate.
In
Out
1:18:17
We've had plenty of complaints of people who are trying to do everything right, and, you know, it's still— we're still getting complaints.
In
Out
1:18:26
Yeah, I— and I, uh, and, and we spoke about this briefly, and I think that that's uh, it plays to, uh, especially because of a city like New Bedford where we're so developed and in some places, you know, there's multi-units above some of these storefronts or they're very close together.
In
Out
1:18:42
So I understand the, the whole, you know, migration aspect of it.
In
Out
1:18:47
And that's all things that would, if something like this were to be allowed, would have to be ironed out where the place has to be properly air sealed and they have to do extra precautions when they're building out these places and utilizing maybe an overkill of the scrubbers and things like that.
In
Out
1:19:04
I even spoke about some like where they— you open the door and the fan comes, blows the air down to keep the, you know, so it doesn't— it's not migrating out.
In
Out
1:19:14
So there are things that are— that can be put in place to utilize it.
In
Out
1:19:18
Even I think we spoke about it was maybe it has to be a standalone building, which would even decrease the number or potential for these buildings, these establishments to exist where there isn't anybody that lives upstairs, that we're not, you know, putting those folks at risk with the smoke migration and secondhand smoke, or they have to be X amount of feet away from a neighboring building or things like that.
In
Out
1:19:42
And I think that— I think we could restrict it enough and still give people the opportunity, because at the end of the day, it's not about Like, yes, we have to give the platform for these businesses to exist, or at least I feel that we should give the platform for these businesses to exist.
In
Out
1:20:00
But it's up to them to know if it's going to be a viable thing.
In
Out
1:20:04
If it's like, hey, these are all the restrictions New Bedford has, and I just can't— it won't, you know, make money for me, so I'm not going to do it.
In
Out
1:20:11
I don't think we can— you know, I know that we spoke about a— you know, you don't want to set them up to fail, but We're not in the process of— we're not in the business of, you know, aiding the business itself.
In
Out
1:20:25
It's about giving the platform a business to thrive.
In
Out
1:20:28
And I think that it's up to them to ultimately make that decision.
In
Out
1:20:31
But in my— I know we're having a discussion about this, but from what I'm hearing with both the motion before us and this one is that there is no appetite from the Board of Health or the members of the, of the Health Department for establishment like this in the city of New Bedford?
In
Out
1:20:52
We have not brought up with our board the cigar bars this time around.
In
Out
1:20:59
However, our board was part of the process when we updated our regulations in which cigar bars was specifically called out as not being allowable.
In
Out
1:21:09
And before that, it wasn't in the language?
In
Out
1:21:13
It was.
In
Out
1:21:14
So it was in the language before.
In
Out
1:21:15
So yeah, but they— but they— we went through the regulations.
In
Out
1:21:19
I mean, they didn't take it out.
In
Out
1:21:21
They left it in because they felt like it was important.
In
Out
1:21:23
Okay.
In
Out
1:21:25
And how long ago was that, that they met and had that— felt that it was important to put that specific language in there?
In
Out
1:21:33
Yeah, fall in 2024.
In
Out
1:21:35
Fall of 2024.
In
Out
1:21:39
And was that a different board than what we have right now?
In
Out
1:21:44
No, everyone— yeah, one of our board members was different.
In
Out
1:21:52
Okay.
In
Out
1:21:53
So the fall of '24, the language was, I guess, strengthened for around cigar bars.
In
Out
1:22:02
Um, when's the next time that you would meet with the board?
In
Out
1:22:07
Um, we are trying to get, um, a time on the books, but it'll likely be, um, the first or second week in April.
In
Out
1:22:19
Okay.
In
Out
1:22:24
And at those meetings, is just the your staff and the board, and then any, any members of the public that are being heard.
In
Out
1:22:35
Okay.
In
Out
1:22:36
And is that, uh, that's open to the public as well?
In
Out
1:22:41
It is in a public meeting.
In
Out
1:22:43
Yep.
In
Out
1:22:44
Okay.
In
Out
1:22:45
Um, awesome.
In
Out
1:22:47
I will look forward to your next meeting.
In
Out
1:22:49
Thank you.
In
Out
1:22:50
If you would like to be on the agenda, just— I'll reach out.
In
Out
1:22:52
Yep.
In
Out
1:22:55
I, uh, I yield, Mr.
In
Out
1:22:56
Chair.
In
Out
1:22:56
Thank you for the time.
In
Out
1:22:57
Thank you, Councillor.
In
Out
1:22:58
Anyone else for Ms. Sloan while she's up?
In
Out
1:23:01
Chair recognizes Councillor Pemberton.
In
Out
1:23:03
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
In
Out
1:23:04
I, I just want to just, just make the comment that I, I don't think that if people don't smoke cigars that they're going to go there.
In
Out
1:23:12
I mean, I don't think it's going to make a difference.
In
Out
1:23:14
If they smoke, they're going to go there.
In
Out
1:23:16
If they don't smoke cigars, I don't think they're going to go there.
In
Out
1:23:18
It's like go to the casino, you can smoke in the casino.
In
Out
1:23:22
I know that.
In
Out
1:23:22
So if I want to go ahead and gamble, then I know that I'm going to have to put up with the cigarette smoke.
In
Out
1:23:27
Although there is another room, I have— I do have an option to go to another room, but I also have that option to stay there with smoke.
In
Out
1:23:33
I just don't think that it's going to make a difference whether if they smoke or not.
In
Out
1:23:38
Thank you.
In
Out
1:23:38
I just, I just wanted to make that comment.
In
Out
1:23:41
Thank you, Councilor.
In
Out
1:23:42
Anyone else for Miss Sloan while she's here?
In
Out
1:23:45
All right, Stephanie, you're all set.
In
Out
1:23:46
Thank you.
In
Out
1:23:46
All right, we have a few other invited guests as it relates to this.
In
Out
1:23:53
We have Miss Carloni still here.
In
Out
1:23:56
The police chief, not sure why you're here for this because, uh, I don't think secondhand smoke a crime.
In
Out
1:24:02
No, I didn't think so.
In
Out
1:24:06
You were invited by the maker of the motion, so congratulations.
In
Out
1:24:11
Welcome to the show.
In
Out
1:24:12
Um, uh, we do have our planner, which could be appropriate for this.
In
Out
1:24:16
We also have, um, Solicitor Jakes, who's here.
In
Out
1:24:20
Anyone else for any of these other department heads?
In
Out
1:24:25
Chair recognizes Councilor Choquette.
In
Out
1:24:26
Could I have Chief Thody come up?
In
Out
1:24:30
Thank you.
In
Out
1:24:31
Sure.
In
Out
1:24:31
You heard him though, it's not a crime to smoke a cigar, right?
In
Out
1:24:34
Or secondhand smoke.
In
Out
1:24:39
All right, Chief, you're up.
In
Out
1:24:42
Thanks, Chief.
In
Out
1:24:43
Um, in your opinion, or even not even in your opinion, but in your experience, how many times have you seen a death occur because somebody was consuming a cigar?
In
Out
1:24:59
And I don't mean to them, but I mean to another person.
In
Out
1:25:02
So if a person consumed a cigar, how many deaths did that cause to the general public?
In
Out
1:25:10
I mean, none that I've ever seen from an immediate smoke.
In
Out
1:25:15
I mean, I guess the argument could be made that over time, right, you said, you know, cancer and things like that, but that's really from a law enforcement perspective.
In
Out
1:25:23
I've never seen a cigar kill anybody immediately.
In
Out
1:25:25
Now let me ask you the next question.
In
Out
1:25:26
In your opinion, in your experience, not your opinion, how many times have you seen somebody in the general public killed because another person consumed alcohol?
In
Out
1:25:38
Oh, I mean, I couldn't put a number on that.
In
Out
1:25:40
That's a lot.
In
Out
1:25:41
That's a much larger number.
In
Out
1:25:41
Exactly right.
In
Out
1:25:43
Currently, is alcohol sold in the city of New Bedford in a bar environment?
In
Out
1:25:49
Yeah.
In
Out
1:25:49
And currently in the city of New Bedford, are cigars sold and consumed in an environment in this, you know, in a public environment?
In
Out
1:25:57
I'm sure they're sold.
In
Out
1:25:58
I don't, I don't smoke anything, so I wouldn't know.
In
Out
1:26:01
But I see them on the golf course on occasion, but that's about it.
In
Out
1:26:03
Absolutely.
In
Out
1:26:05
Not too many crashes with the golf carts because of a nice Nicaraguan cigar, though, right?
In
Out
1:26:09
Yeah.
In
Out
1:26:09
I mean, the bottom line is that I don't— I don't— that there's no under-the-influence law that would— that would include tobacco or cigars or cigarettes.
In
Out
1:26:17
So, I mean, from a, from a law enforcement perspective, it really doesn't have a lot to do with us.
In
Out
1:26:23
Okay, that's all I wanted to do.
In
Out
1:26:25
Thank you, Chief.
In
Out
1:26:26
Anyone else for the Chief while he's up here so he doesn't go up and down?
In
Out
1:26:29
Okay, thank you.
In
Out
1:26:32
Anyone else for any of our invited guests while they're here?
In
Out
1:26:37
Alrighty, well, you know what, uh, the chair is requesting for a motion on this, so I'll entertain a motion to table at this time.
In
Out
1:26:44
Motion to table made by Councilor Choquette.
In
Out
1:26:47
Second.
In
Out
1:26:47
Seconded by Councilor Pemberton.
In
Out
1:26:49
All those in favor say aye.
In
Out
1:26:50
Aye.
In
Out
1:26:51
Opposed?
In
Out
1:26:51
The ayes have it.
In
Out
1:26:52
Seeing that there is no other business before us tonight, make a motion to adjourn.
In
Out
1:26:58
Made by Councillor Pemberton.
In
Out
1:27:00
I need a second.
In
Out
1:27:01
Thank you.
In
Out
1:27:02
Seconded by Councillor Choquette.
In
Out
1:27:04
Anyone on the question of adjournment?
In
Out
1:27:05
All those in favor say aye.
In
Out
1:27:07
Aye.
In
Out
1:27:08
Opposed?
In
Out
1:27:08
The ayes have it.
In
Out
1:27:09
We are adjourned at 7:57 PM.
In
Out
1:27:11
Have a great evening, everyone.
In
Out